Older drivers appear to be increasing our road toll

Last updated 11:43 23/09/2009

tollIt looks like we've already achieved next year's hoped-for road toll already, despite being only three-quarters of the way through the year.

That's not good news at all, as the hoped-for 300 deaths for 2010 looks as far away as it ever has.

And from the LTNZ's own figures, it appears that this year's increase is not being caused by the young people our authorities seem to be currently putting their resources into, either.

The road toll continues its sad upward curve with a total for those killed on our roads so far this year of 303, compared with 257 for the same period during 2008. And it's worth remembering that we are the only OECD country with such an upward trend.

Our police and transport authorities continue to target younger drivers, when their own road toll figures show that those under the age of 24 have not increased in terms of road toll numbers in the past 12 months. It's those in the 25-39 year segment (up from 59 to 72, year to date), and the 40-59 slot (up from 47 to 66, year to date) and those 60-plus (up from 44 to 61, year to date) that appear to be contributing more than their fair share of the 46-person increase.

Why aren't they being targeted too?

36 comments
Post a comment
nick   #1   12:56 pm Sep 23 2009

Because its easier. You don't get the same level of effective protest and general bitching about being hard done by from the under 24yo group.

xLeahx   #2   12:57 pm Sep 23 2009

I would love to know the answer to that question. IMHO the most frequent drivers to pull out without looking, brake suddenly or drive eratically, and speed on passing lanes and do 80kms on the regular road, are older people (I'd say 50 years +).

Younger people may pose alot, drive round and round the centre of town, and rev their cars while doing it, but I've never actually had an experience with them like I have with older drivers.

Alan Wilkinson   #3   02:25 pm Sep 23 2009

Doing the arithmetic on Dave's numbers to find the info he didn't give us, it seems 104 under-24 year-olds have been killed this year to date compared with 107 last year. So they are still dying at roughly twice the rate of older drivers.

It's a fair guess that distance-driven by young drivers has fallen disproportionately in the recession since their unemployment figures are very high.

ugly   #4   02:49 pm Sep 23 2009

Not that I am disagreeing with the premise that some oldies on the road are a major hazard, but are you not confusing "who causes" with "who dies" or did I miss something in your article?

There seem to have been several incidents lately where the person at fault hasn't been the one who's copped it.

Geoff   #5   03:30 pm Sep 23 2009

@ ugly #4 That's a very good point actually. Seems the implication is that it is automatically the fault of the deceased. Frequently the "fault" is being in the wrong place at the wrong time.

The Trickster   #6   04:03 pm Sep 23 2009

ugly #4 2:49pm

True that. It's always worth looking at who the driver of the offending vehicle is rather than who the victims are.

kelvin2   #7   04:31 pm Sep 23 2009

Lies, Lies, and damned statistics!

Considering 15-25 year lods only make up 15% or so of the total population, aren't they over represented with 34% plus of the road fatalities?

Tony   #8   08:32 pm Sep 23 2009

As a licence-holder for 55 years I probably shouldn't be commenting here. However, has anyone been stuck behind a car (it used to be a Morris 1100 with a driver who wears a battered trilby) proceeding at around 80kmh on the open road with a constantly right-turning flasher.

They are a hazard but do they get a ticket for impeding traffic flow and encouraging dodgy overtaking and a possible accident. No way, it is the poor sod doing a safe 120kmh that cops it.

Sailor Sam   #9   08:12 am Sep 24 2009

I see lots of "mature" drivers in huge SUVs, tricked up HSV Commoddores and XR8 Falcons on the open road blasting at 120kph plus and overtaking in the most ridiculous places. Drivers who seem to spend 99% of the time in the 50 kph city zones and then are unable to cope with 100kph country driving.

LouG   #10   12:19 pm Sep 24 2009

As an ex-Driver Testing Officer I was gobsmacked when Clark's Labour Government dropped the practical test requirement for over 80's. Another of her cynical grabs for votes. Too many elderly drivers are simply dangerous. They can barely cope as long traveling the same route everyday as so many do, but put them in an unfamiliar situation and they are lethal. The experience of an elderly driver I was testing pulling out in front of a truck and trailer unit traveling at 80 km/h is not one I wish to repeat.


Show 11-36 of 36 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content