Ad Feedback

TV review: Beijing, a tough act to follow

The Dominion Post
Last updated 10:19 26/08/2008
Reuters
LIGHTS IN THE NIGHT SKY: Beijing's Olympic Games was often breathtaking - the commentary team, less so.

Relevant offers

People are already angsting over the unlikelihood of London being able even faintly to approach the Olympic Games grandeur offered by Beijing - and nothing illustrated the validity of that fear more vividly than their respective contributions to the Games closing ceremony yesterday morning.

China again had its performers under almost inhuman control, in their wildly improbably numbers. Drummers and jangly dancers by the thousand performed afresh like ants in pre-programmed swarm mode, smiles unfaltering, synchronisation faultless.

In contrast, the part of the ceremony meant to symbolise the handover to the 2012 Games began with a London double-decker bus - hardly the jewel in the crown of even British engineering.

The bus was surrounded by a scruffy bunch of chavs, who lurked and leered around in what was obviously meant to be a dance routine, but which made it look as though they were about to loot the bus, shake down anyone who was on board, and strip the vehicle to its axles before setting it alight.

As the dance progressed, the bus proved safe, but such dance synchronicity as was attempted by the scruffs made them look very like the comic zombies in the movie Shaun of the Dead.

Actually, after all that dazzling Chinese perfection, it was a bit of a relief. Where China is all about the might of numbers, Britain is a nation more distinguished by individual eccentrics. Jimmy Page, looking remarkably unravaged for a 70s rock star, gave us a stunning solo performance.

David Beckham kicked a football. And perhaps most emblematic of all of Britain's imperviousness to the cult of well- organised glamour, London's Mayor Boris Johnson, though dressed tidily and having had a haircut of sorts, still managed to look like someone's boozy uncle who had gatecrashed the function.

It's fun trying to imagine Britain trying anything on the scale of China's mass-population marvels of dance. Think Dad's Army writ large. Performers would be demanding toilet breaks, forming unions, quarrelling with the choreographer, refusing to remove their iPods and stopping for cups of tea.

Britain is capable of mass-population displays at stadiums. But the world knows these already, as football hooliganism. Some wit has already kidded about massed displays by Pearly Kings and Queens, and Morris dancers.

But after four more years of global warming, such conspicuous displays of opulence may be blessedly outre, in time for Britain to open its Games with witty but emphatically modest flair.

For all the grumping and carping about the Olympic Games coverage, and the peculiarities of China's competitive spirit, only a complete misery guts could have failed to be impressed by the fortnight's unending spectacle. It's hard to think of any other event that could make such sustainedly compelling telly.

Ad Feedback

Even sports we thought we could sneer at - beach volleyball, synchronised swimming - become riveting when you know you're seeing the best in the world - particularly factoring in the remarkable ability of successive generations of athletes to improve on what already seemed sublime.

Though we can't, and shouldn't, put aside our repugnance of China's human rights atrocities, there has been something touching about the mighty country's desperate attempts to impress the rest of the world. We are already impressed - impressed witless, actually - by the country's sheer size and ruthlessness.

But in the sports arena, its might, wealth and iron control count for nothing beside the performance of a lone individual. Look at Liu Xiang, the Olympic champion hurdler who injured his foot in the heats, and had to face an outraged country that expected him, required him, to win another gold.

Look at tiny gymnast He Kexin, who might yet let her country down by not having been born a couple of years earlier.

While China dominated the medals table, it was forced to undergo the useful experiences of disappointment and humiliation, as the world expressed dismay that performers had been chosen on looks, and that fakery and lipsynching had been a feature of the opening spectacle.

Chinese architecture constantly stole the show from the athletes. The Water Cube, the Bird's Nest - every vista was breathtaking, making the coverage a dream for broadcasters.

Though our commentators could dial it back a bit, they had a tough job, specially in the early days when our medal chances seemed grim. The TV commentariat's policy of filling the lulls in activity with waffle, and ranting ceaselessly when anyone neared a finish line, is long overdue for review.

Silence can actually heighten our appreciation of the drama and suspense. I found it soothing to turn the sound off at times.

It was a bit rough Keith Quinn getting Valerie Vili's name wrong and exclaiming about how big she was - "she gets it from her parents!" - and Pete Montgomery kept raving about rowers having to "decide how much they really want to win!" as if they were somehow being recalcitrant.

But the bigger gaffes were committed by the editors and directors, who decided to chop in and out of sports at some remarkably dumb times.

Most frustrating was the women's cycle race, picturesque and utterly riveting, that was summarily jettisoned for a minor soccer game being played by the New Zealand team.

Surely viewers can be given credit for being sophisticated enough to watch, and even prefer, some events New Zealanders are not involved in.

Replete with a whole new set of superheroes and noble failures, viewers will find it quite tough to sink back into Border Patrol, Piha Rescue and Coronation Street.

Let's just hope we don't have to endure any more "Look at us! We're in Beijing!" video diary nonsense from the reporters and presenters that both main channels had stationed at the Games.

* What did you think of the Olympic Games? Post your comments below.

24 comments
ben   #24   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Great olympics, only barely passable coverage. TVNZ clearly does not want the olympics that badly so I'm glad it's going to sky next time. We will be able to watch all of the road race, the swimming, the track and field and the team sports as sky will have three of four channels going at once.

Brendon Telfer made some gaffes too..most notably in the mens triathlon when he kept on saying both the leaders on the bike were from belgium...they weren't one was from luxemborg.

Paul   #23   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

In response to Mark

Yes it was a lot of money. Yes it could've been spent on "more important" things.

But the Olympics is the closest thing to world peace we are ever going to get.

You should be ashamed of YOURself for posting such a one eyed comment

Rico   #22   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

The greatest Spectacle on earth Top show my fellow little Chinese friends, from start to finish this is what a billion people all working to one goal can achieve. Such an epic two weeks, i believe we will never witness anything that will top this in our life time. Sure their human wrights is poor perhaps shocking, but you have to give it to them, China are now the world power and what a way to announce it. I cant say Im to excited about London, there is no way a bunch of fat useless poms are going to be able to put on half a show like Beijing.

mike   #21   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

The games were great but I missed most of the stupendousness given it was screening in the wee hours of the morning. Noone can put down the fact that the Chinese did a fantastic job and human rights abuses aside they did it their way and it worked because they re still one of the remaining large countries that can exercise a good degree of control over their people to do the right thing. Overall the venues were fantastic and we were able to absorb ourselves in the competition without thinking of the host venue which is how any Olympics should be England will never be able to replicate this and it really cannot as it represents the now rag tag but relatively free-thinking West. It will give to the games a flavour of its own and you can bet there will be some controversies and some interesting features. The biggest concern in my view will be the security and the threat of terrorist attacks. I would think that no two-bit terrorist would dare act up in China in the main core of the Olympic festivities because of the fearsome consequences that would arise if they did. This may not be the case in the more chaotic GB but you can bet they will be pragmatic in their approach given their wide experience of terrorist activities.

Yes I agree with what they say about the verbal commentary given by the TVNZ presenters. They act as though as they were at some private BBQ spouting their arrogant opinions (are they products of the 70's??). Give us a change and with some more intelligently oriented people who report on the sports more than the personal appearances of athletes. At least with the pommy games we can expect to see these in either the evening or the morning given the 12 hour time difference and by that time

John H   #20   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

TVNZ Sports Extra (channel 20 on Freeview) was excellent. No advertising and no cutting away at inappropriate times to cover another event. As has been mentioned, it was a shame that Freeview didn't use this as a marketing tool. The sad thing is that Sports Extra has now gone back to "test card" mode. If TVNZ held the rights, I would more than happy if they filled up the next couple of months showing full unedited footage of the games - especially everything that wasn't shown the first-time around which when you consider the number of sports at the Olympics, would have been a hell of a lot. Glad to see that the commentators took on board the criticism which had been directed at them and mostly kept their mouths shut during the closing ceremony. Not so happy to hear that Sky have the rights for London 2012 and the era of live free-to-air Olympics coverage is probably over.

Andrew Mehrtens   #19   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Murray Mexted should do all the commentary for the Olympics, that'd be brilliant.

Mike   #18   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

I cannot accept that it was worth the 80 million or so dollars that it cost over the last four years for 9 pieces of metal, Or the 40 something billion dollars that China payed out to make it all happen. Not when China's situation is like it is now and even here in New Zealand.. 80 million dollars here would be alot of operations, or alot to a charity group etc.. Disgusting.. We should be ashamed.

tremulant   #17   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

I loved the Olympics, I now have to find a new after work hobbie now that its finished.

Great to see top sports on tele but not so good that to catch the majority of it you had to have freeview, this was not good PR by an SOE.

The roving reporters next time need to be ex games athletes that have tact when asking questions to athletes. How was one of our reporters asking Bolt - "How does it feel to be the fastest man on earth?" or Toni Street antagonising athletes with her silly comments. Surely someone like Sarah Ulmer or Alison Fitch could have done a better job.

Paulette Tamati-Elliffe   #16   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

The Games were fantastic, and overall our commentators were entertaining but our roaming reporter was a shocker! I dont think I've heard anything more amateur than when she interviewed the Irish competitor after the quarter-finals in the mens 200m sprint what it was like racing against so many black men, and how all our white men back home in New Zealand would really be looking up to him at that moment - it was definitely cringy to say the least. He responded well, commenting that he has been racing against these competitors over the recent years, and tends not to look at them as "black" but as fellow competitors! Shame on you Toni Street!

Craig   #15   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

One aspect of the games that I thoroughly enjoyed was the High Definition TV coverage that was provided by TV1.

And also credit should be given to the games 'source broadcaster' for some of the amazing slow motion sequences that were seen in the swimming and archery coverage.


Show 1-14 of 24 comments
Ad Feedback
Special offers
Opinion poll

Does Johnny Depp deserve to be named the Sexiest Man Alive?

Hell yes - he's hot

He's hot, but others are hotter

Hell no - he's not hot

Vote Result

Related story: Johnny Depp earns second 'sexiest man' title

Featured Promotions