Waikato art award winner just rubbish - artists

BY BRUCE HOLLOWAY
Last updated 12:00 08/09/2009
WINNER: Dane Mitchell's entry to the Waikato National Contemporary Art Award.
Waikato Times
WINNER: Dane Mitchell's entry to the Waikato National Contemporary Art Award.
Charlotte Huddleston
KELLY HODEL/Waikato Times
HOW INTERESTING: Judge Charlotte Huddleston looking at winning art work by Dane Mitchell.

Relevant offers

Arts

First... and last honour for artist State house sculpture in 'poor taste' An invisible bullet $15,000 prize winning artwork shatters Capturing a city Photographer puts Bob Dylan's fame in frame Auction house stand by treatment of McCahon painting NZ contemporary art award winner: A shelf What the shelve? Mayo painting sells for $55,400

Art buffs have trashed the pile of rubbish which won this year's Waikato National Contemporary Art Award, describing it as embarrassing for the community.

But Waikato Museum director Kate Vusoniwailala leapt to the defence of judge Charlotte Huddleston, saying it was "an excellent decision" which had helped achieve the objective of getting people talking about art.

Berlin-based Dane Mitchell picked up $15,000 for his entry, Collateral, which consisted of the binned wrapping from other award entries tipped on to the floor of the Waikato Museum, in line with his written instructions submitted to gallery staff.

He had not seen his entry when it won.

However Mark Hayes, who built a sculpture for the award, entitled Domestic Violence is Not Okay, was unimpressed.

"If I had known that the contents of my rubbish bin would make the winning sculpture I would not have spent 26 hours cutting, welding and grinding," he said.

"Contemporary art needs to say something to you and make you think. I am sorry but I just cannot see the 'clever' and 'cheeky' in the winning sculpture. Is someone trying to make Trust Waikato look like a joke?

This was Trust Waikato's final year of award sponsorship.

Hamilton artists Collette Fergus and Bruce McLachlan said the winning entry was "the worst yet".

"A pile of rubbish that wasn't even created by this guy is worth $15,000?" said Ms Fergus. "That is insane. Do the other artists whose names were in the pile feel okay that this is clearly mocking them and their entries?

"What was the judge on when she chose this; awarding that sort of money for a piece of art mockery that does not even deserve the title of art? She has clearly lost the plot."

Ms Fergus accepted that unusual and provocative art was expected at the Waikato Contemporary Art Award.

"We however feel that perhaps they should remove the word art from the title of the award. This pile of rubbish is not art and this is not an award for artists. It's a sad mockery of us all and an embarrassment to the arts community."

But Ms Vusoniwailala was delighted with the level of public interest being generated by the award.

"If we are having a lot of conversations about the award, we are achieving an objective," she said.

Ad Feedback

"There will always be people who love things and those who hate them. The bottom line is we always ensure the judge we select has an excellent reputation.

"She (Ms Huddleston) has been fantastic to work with, very professional, and has put together a stunning show, and a significant show for New Zealand that has shown this city has come of age."

Morrinsville women Heather Oleson questioned whether the winning entry had complied with the rules and was eligible.

"Who is the celebrating artist/winner here?" she asked. "Is it the museum staff who created the entry, or is it Mitchell who gave the instructions?"

She noted the awards criteria required the work to be the artist's own, with one digital photo of the work included, and artwork not permitted to be "altered" after being submitted.

- Waikato Times

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content