Queen's News of the World

Last updated 08:44 18/07/2011

The news of the News of the World newspaper hanging up its spy-tools and shutting shop arrived just as I was rediscovering the album News of the World. There's probably not a lot in that - but I just wanted you to be sure you were not reading my thoughts on the closure of the muck-raking tabloid. I did laugh, though, at The Guardian being described as leading the charge to bring down the News of the World. Yes, The Guardian would never do anything dodgy at all. Like, um, for instance, that time The Guardian took my interview with Damon Albarn and posted it on their site, removing my name, the Stuff.co.nz banner and any suggestion that it was an article that had not come from The Guardian.

I'm a hack. A nobody. A dude with a couple of jobs outside of writing my thoughts about music - so what could I do? When I wrote to the Entertainment Editor of The Guardian and suggested they provide an actual link to my interview - that's all I was after - I was told to not be so precious. But, small victory, they did acquiesce - and I didn't even need to threaten that I'd be tapping their phones (since I knew how much they hated that).

Anyway...to Queen. Regular readers (hi mum!) will know that I am not really a fan of Queen's music. I grew up with those compilations Greatest Hits and Greatest Hits II being all but forced down my throat. My brother was a fan. My parents were fans. And, early on, so was I.

I'd rather down ipecac than listen to Queen's Greatest Hits/Greatest Hits II these days. Well, the effect of so much of the music is much the same anyway. The pomp and bombast - two selling points for Queen, I guess - just do my head in. And, as I've previously explored, it isn't really Queen that I vehemently dislike, it's Queen fans - all this "Freddie was the greatest" talk. Queen fans are a special breed. They can walk upright, unassisted, for longer periods than, say, Kiss fans. But they suffer from a similar affliction, so engrossed in music that is often so thoroughly mediocre. So incapable of understanding the real worth of this group.

Queen remains something of an anomaly - a successful band, loved by many, that appears to have had no real influence on any music that has followed. Well, not on any decent music anyway. You could spin that around and say that Queen was unique - a one-off. Sure, you could do that. You could also convince yourself, as the blindly faithful tend to do, that this was actually a good thing.

Or you could cherry-pick from the band's career. Find a few of the early gems and leave the cliché "hits" to be enjoyed as sporting themes, stadium-audience singalong fodder and songs George Michael can have hits with.

Universal Music picked up the Queen catalogue - sold to them, presumably, because EMI is broke. So now all of the Queen albums are being re-released, each with a bonus EP of live versions, demos, outtakes. You know, the usual - all the things you didn't need the first time but might be enough to entice you to part with cash to re-experience the album even though you'll never play the bonus content through more than once. In other words the last resort of CD marketing.

There was a batch of Queen albums earlier in the year and now another handful has arrived. This lot captures the end of the good stuff and the start of the really bad material (Flash Gordon soundtrack, Hot Space). There'll be one more lot to come - the mid-1980s to early-1990s wrap-up.

My favourite Queen album might not be the obvious choice - you might think it's the worst of the lot - but that's what discussing music is about, having different opinions. So I was happy to receive the latest batch of Queen reissues because it reminded me of News of the World. An album I loved.

I have to be honest, I'd all but forgotten about it - wasn't worried about ever hearing it again - but News of the World was one of my all-time favourite albums for a while there. And it's probably still on the longer list now. Especially after re-engaging with it.

Released in 1977, Queen's sixth album starts with two giant hits - We Will Rock You and We Are the Champions. Two of the Queen songs that bring on the ipecac reaction. But they did the business at the time. Sure. In fact these are the two big sports anthems now; hardly Queen's fault, I know.

I was always more interested in the rest of the album. And only because it was the first Queen material - outside of the greatest hits albums - that I got to hear. We had this live album too. It was blasted often but News of the World was the first original album by Queen that I experienced. I bought the tape in the early 1990s, maybe just before Freddie went off to that big S&M party in the sky. And I became fascinated with all the different versions of Queen I got to hear.

News of the World still makes sense to me - as an album. It showcases Brian May and Roger Taylor and John Deacon and of course Freddie Mercury as writers and as performers. Taylor and May handle some of the lead vocals; there's at least one track where Freddie doesn't even feature.

There's a near-punk song that is also a comment on the genre. There's the most erotically overcharged song the group ever recorded. There's a blues/boogie jam that pretty much falls apart while it's trying, still, to hang together. There's my favourite Freddie Mercury song; one that feels as though it gets as close as possible to presenting a real version of Freddie to his fans, or is it just another character (anyone else out there see parallels between Freddie Mercury and Peter Sellers - or is that just me?).

And I think two of the best songs Freddie ever sang, that play to his strengths, were this one composed by Deacon. And this one composed by May.

And Brian May's All Dead, All Dead is my favourite Queen song ever. That he wrote it about his cat seems to sum up how brilliantly absurd this band could be. And how, just as often, the brilliance comes from studiously over-zealous fans. Actually, this band was often just absurd.

I'm sure you could spin this around and talk about News of the World being stupid, being full of weird direction-changes, a blatant reach for the mainstream and a shunning of the harder rock and prog areas the band had explored.

I will certainly agree it is the beginning of the slide. But for me it is the best Queen album - the one that introduced me to the band as players and to their composing personalities; the one that made me look past the show-pony that strutted and fretted his hours on the stage, a limelight hog that for both good and bad was overtly the Queen image/voice/icon.

So, do you have a favourite Queen album? What is it? Are any of you fans of the Newsof the World album too? And if Queen is not your bag - at all - then maybe you can share the one album you like by a band that you (mostly) do not like at all. (If you need an example, I already put myself down for The Unforgettable Fire by U2 as an example of that one-good-album deal as part of Friday's post.)

Keep up with Blog on the Tracks on Facebook and follow on Twitter.

If you like this blog, then vote for it in this year's Netguide Web Awards! Click on this link, scroll down to the Best Blog category, and type or paste in stuff.co.nz/entertainment/blogs/blog-on-the-tracks

Post a comment
Benneh   #1   09:04 am Jul 18 2011

I too grew up on a diet of Queen's Greatest Hits I and II, but I didn't really tire of the compilations until I began exploring their catalogue years later and came to realise what I was missing. To this day they remain my favourite band.

My favourite albums of theirs would be Sheer Heart Attack and A Night At The Opera for a complete listening experience, The Game is a guilty pleasure and Innuendo is surprisingly strong considering Freddie's health by that stage.

News Of The World? It's okay, but doesn't quite flow as well as SHA or ANATO to me.

craig   #2   09:07 am Jul 18 2011

How bout you put the actual name of the song instead of things like 'and this one' as a link. I dont want to have to click on 12 links just to know what you're talking about.

Don 1   #3   09:18 am Jul 18 2011

INteresting choice. My own favourite is its predecessor, A Day At The Races, mostly because the collection of songs was better, with great stuff like Drowse, You and I and White Man. But at least NOTW was better than its awful successor Jazz, a vile collection of self-indulgent tripe. The Game wasn't bad either, although it effectively marked the end of Queen as an interesting band. All in all, though Live Killers is the Queen album I'd save if the house was on fire.

Simon Sweetman   #4   09:41 am Jul 18 2011

@Craig - sorry, wouldn't want you to do any work at all now...

Soap   #5   10:12 am Jul 18 2011

Simon, my eyes are tired. I can't be bothered moving them from left to right to read sentences across the page. How about you just write each word in a single vertical column.

Tim Possible   #6   10:14 am Jul 18 2011

Live Killers is the only Queen needed. Quite liked The Game back in the day but not really a Queen fan.

Simon, just on your response to Craig, not all of us reading BOTT at work are able to trapse all over the net following your links.

Simon Sweetman   #7   10:20 am Jul 18 2011

@Tim Possible - Tim, just on your response to my response to Craig, I don't always link without mentioning song-titles. It just seemed appropriate for me to do it that way with this post. Maybe Craig can look up the links at home.

Question Time   #8   10:22 am Jul 18 2011

My favourite is definately A Night at the Opera. Putting aside the obvious Bohemian Rhapsody, it has so much quality and diversity. Everyone knows someone that Death on Two Legs could have been written about. It just has so many of my favourite Queen songs on it - You're My Best Friend, 39, I'm In Love With My Car, The Prophet's Song.

I think it's one of those albums that every serious music fan should have. I know they make cheesy documentaries about it, but just because something is popular or well known doesn't make it any less good.

Graham   #9   10:28 am Jul 18 2011

'Fight From The Inside' is Taylor's best Queen song, in my opinion.

Question Time   #10   11:14 am Jul 18 2011

And Sweetman, why do you have to be so mean all the time? You can say you don't like something or disagree with an opinion without implying the other party is somehow inferior to you. "You could spin that around and say that Queen was unique - a one-off. Sure, you could do that. You could also convince yourself, as the blindly faithful tend to do, that this was actually a good thing" Why say something like that? The only reason that I read your blog is because I love music and you are the only music blogger on Stuff. What I get the most from is the comments though, people who don't feel the need to denigrate others to advance their own theories. You should try it some time.

Show 11-50 of 50 comments

Post comment


Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.

Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content