Paul Henry's disjointed return to TV

Last updated 11:26 13/02/2012

Paul Henry made his long-awaited return to television last night as the host of Would I Lie to You?, a panel show in which two teams try to trick each other by trying to pass off unbelievable statements as the truth. It's a great idea for a show, adapted from a British series of the same name, and boasts a pair of decent team leaders in 7 Days regulars Jesse Mulligan and Jon Bridges.

20120213Surprisingly, the immediate response - at least on Twitter and Facebook - was overwhelmingly negative. It wasn't a perfect show by any stretch. But I certainly don't think it was bad enough to warrant the response it received, and many of the complaints (mostly to do with the editing and the choice of guests) were unfair, as if everyone was disappointed that it isn't 7 Days 2.0.

One complaint that I saw multiple times was from people who thought the teams should have been made up entirely of comedians, as opposed to the mix of comedians, actors and personalities who appeared last night. However, the British show uses guests such as Nigel Havers and Sir Terry Wogan, an actor and a general television personality. I haven't seen the British show, but I suspect the Kiwi version is probably closer to the original than most viewers might expect.

The response on social media actually reminded me of Friday's post, in which we discussed how much time we should allow for a new show to find its feet, deciding that three shows is enough time for a show to grab you as a viewer. Shouldn't we extend the same courtesy to a show like Would I Lie to You?

For all its faults, and even though I didn't enjoy it as much as I was expecting, it seems only a couple of tweaks away from being a genuinely good watch. First, I think the show needed more explanation at the start of the episode; as viewers, we were just thrown in without any idea what was about to happen. The game is simple enough to follow, but I still had an "okay, so that's how it works" moment after the first round.

Second, the show seemed to work best when the "lies" were harder to figure out. There was no suspense when guest panellist Robyn Malcolm tried to make everyone believe that she had three rotisserie chickens delivered to her dressing room each morning while working on Outrageous Fortune, but it was interesting when Malcolm, Mulligan and Ewen Gilmour told equally believable stories about a surprise guest in the "This Is My ..." round.

The show will succeed or fail with the choice of panellists. There will be weeks in which the guests don't work as well as the producers might hope - for example, Penny Ashton is immensely talented, but she looked downright uncomfortable last night. I don't think it's fair to give up on the show because of an occasional bad choice of guest.

Besides, I thought it was great to learn a little about the guests. Oliver Driver's tale about an argument he had with a random lady who thought he was Jeremy "Newsboy" Wells had me in stitches.

I haven't even mentioned how host Paul Henry* didn't seem a good fit for the show, almost as if he was on a different wavelength from the two teams. Where panellists like Mulligan, Bridges and Driver seemed capable of interjecting off-the-cuff comments, Henry seemed to be delivering pre-written bits that sounded out of place and stopped any momentum the show was building up.

Perhaps Henry isn't capable of that impromptu style and tried not to get involved? Perhaps he has trouble fitting scripted lines into the flow of conversation? Or perhaps he simply isn't as interesting, or as funny, as the guest panellists he was surrounded by? I think it might be a bit of all three - and while he might improve over time (a la Jeremy Corbett on 7 Days), it sure doesn't seem his skill-set suits this particular format.**

Would I Lie To You didn't get off to a great start, but with a little tweaking (and a little time for Henry to get into the swing of things) it could certainly become a great show.

Anyway, those are my thoughts - now I'm interested in yours:

Did you watch Would I Lie To You? If so, what did you think of the first episode? Will you give it another chance, or is there simply not enough to keep you interested? How do you think the show could be improved? And are you glad to see Paul Henry back on broadcast TV?

(*) My sole post about Paul Henry is still the most-commented-on OTB post to date.

(**) It also proves that he probably wouldn't do as well on 7 Days as we all might have hoped.

Make sure you like On the Box on Facebook and add Chris on Twitter.
Or, feel free to email Chris at 
otbmail@chrisphilpott.co.nz
This is a spoiler-free blog - please comment responsibly.

142 comments
Post a comment
Hamish   #1   11:27 am Feb 13 2012

this is sure to bring out the Henry haters...

skoobiedoo   #2   11:30 am Feb 13 2012

I made the mistake of walking into the lounge and olds were watching it... *yawn* 5mins later thoughts on it were yer this is average... /wrists or walk off and find something else to do :)

Ivan   #3   11:30 am Feb 13 2012

I would imagine that many people will still hate his guts. He cooked his goose a long time ago.

vallit   #4   11:30 am Feb 13 2012

Henry is simply unwatchable.

Noshow   #5   11:31 am Feb 13 2012

I don't want to kick off a comments war that eclipses your original post on the guy, but I wouldn't watch this simply because Paul Henry is on it.

kev   #6   11:33 am Feb 13 2012

his sarcasm and sneer is completely unsuited for a light hearted show.

m0rph3us   #7   11:36 am Feb 13 2012

I didn't think it was great... and I'd agree that Paul Henry just didn't seem to really gel with the show. I might give it a chance to see if it improves - there were enough good moments to suggest it has some promise.

Sandra   #8   11:39 am Feb 13 2012

What a pity that TV3 decided to include Paul Henry on the show. The other guys are witty but Henry is just a bore.

groggy   #9   11:40 am Feb 13 2012

mmm I'll pass if PH is in it. Can't stand the man or his opinions.

But I'm surprised to hear that he isn't good at impromptu after all that experience on breakfast. I'd have thought that filling all those hours with pointless waffle would be great training.

JD   #10   11:40 am Feb 13 2012

Great to see Henry back on the air in NZ, he should never have been made a scape goat to the over sensitive poser's in this country.

As for the show last night, well what can you say, Kiwi's just are not that funny, never have been and by what's on offer now, one doubts they ever will be.


Show 11-60 of 142 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content