Bestselling author faces battle for NZ residency
Relevant offers
Books
A popular author whose work focuses on the challenges faced by migrants is fighting a real-life battle to gain New Zealand residency.
Marina Lewycka, who wrote the international bestseller A Short History of Tractors in Ukrainian and Two Caravans, wants to join her husband of 22 years, Dave Feickert, in Wanganui.
Mr Feickert said the Immigration Service had told the couple they had to prove they were in a relationship by providing copies of their email correspondence, and by living together for an unspecified amount of time in New Zealand.
They have been together since 1975 and have a 32-year-old daughter, Sonia.
"How utterly ridiculous," Lewycka said. "I thought New Zealand was a 'can do' society."
Because of her promotional obligations as an author, and Mr Feickert's job as an international coalmine safety adviser, the couple are rarely in New Zealand at the same time for a long period.
Lewycka lives in Sheffield, England, where she is preparing for the publication of her third book, We Are All Made of Glue, in July.
She has spent the last five summers in Wanganui and writes her books at the house she shares with Mr Feickert while in New Zealand.
A Short History of Tractors in Ukrainian, which has sold millions of copies, tells of two Ukrainian sisters who grew up in England. Two Caravans details the lives of migrant strawberry pickers.
Lewycka was born in a displaced persons camp in Germany to Ukrainian parents after World War II and was taken to England when she was three months old.
Mr Feickert described the situation as Kafkaesque.
"To me it's just completely absurd. I know they have rules they have to follow ... but why go through all the rigmarole of rejecting someone like Marina?"
He did not think the couple's situation was unusual in the modern world, and said his wife wanted to become a Kiwi.
"She loves New Zealand and it's as simple as that."
After inquiries from The Dominion Post yesterday, a senior Immigration Service official in Palmerston North told Mr Feickert the couple no longer had to live together in New Zealand for a set period, and said they had to provide only an email heading rather than full copies of their correspondence.
The Immigration Service would not comment yesterday.
By SIMON WOOD, The Dominion Post
Sponsored links
I am reading this book when my husband pointed out this piece of news about the writer. Well I am shocked that she wrote a whole book or two about immigration and it's difficulties and then she whines about it publicly. What a joke. Well obviously she thinks she should be given special treatment. Like a lot of people have said just follow the rules and you'll get it. It's as simple as that. I applaud Immigration NZ that they are treating everyone the same whether or not they have sold a million books or not. cheers
Martin (#27)
I didn't say that it was for the applicant to decide if they were on a preferential list.
All I was saying is that I don't think that all applications should necessarily be treated equally, merely in the name of fairness. I think that when it comes to enticing good quality migrants it's a competitve environment, and there are some people who need to be snapped up. The Immigration Service should be empowered to do this.
I didn't necessarily include the person in question in this number.
George #26
You are missing the point -- Every single applicant must go thru the same process, providing the same documentations that are required of them, and meet all non-criminal tests that are expected of them. Whether or not the applicant happens to be on the "preferential list" is only for NZ Immigration to decide! It is NOT for the applicants to decide and claim that they are the "best of the bunch", and therefore, are exempt from meeting the standard!
Given your conviction that "the world isn't fair" and that "this is a hostile environment", it would be dangerous and thoughtless to fastrack applications based on perceived notions of a person's noble career or lack-there-of. Don't ever forget what happened to the US when they failed to appropriately screen immigrants into their country during 2001 and be grateful as well as supportive of what NZ Immigration is trying to do.
Martijn (#25) - Why on earth should everyone "be treated the same exact way as other applicants to ensure consistency and fairness"?
Surely with immigration policy, especially for a small country such as NZ, you would want to cherry pick and get the very best of the bunch. Even if that meant that some people get preference over others?
I'm not saying that this woman, as a well known author, should be on that preferential list. (And I have heard of her and her books although I haven't got round to reading them yet. I understand they are well worth a look). But surely we should be encouraging the best people we can to come to our country, rather than dumbing down to the lowest common denominator in the name of (the politically correct?) concept of 'fairness'. The world isn't fair, my friend. We have to do the best we can in what is a competitive and hostile environment.
If it comes down to fast tracking doctors or other skilled professionals rather than losing them I think most kiwis, despite their notion of 'a fair go', would be ok with that.
Because the tone of this article was set by Simon Wood at the Dominion Post, it is apparent that this newspaper is trying to elicit and eventually squeezes inappropriate changes in immigration laws for their "special" subject. That is NOT how legislation works, especially for a first-world country like New Zealand, and the editor of this newspaper should know that before he allows such an absurd article to be published.
I have known of Nobel Laureates, Humanatarians, Scientists, Olympians, etc. who, all have to follow and live through set guidelines and meet all immigration requirements for acceptance to the country! This is the same process for EVERYONE! and it SHOULD BE! This is what makes a country like New Zealand desirable.
If this woman M. Lewycka feels that she is better than the rest of the applicants and all those who have gone through this process before her, then she surely doesn't belong in this country. Best-selling author or not, she will be treated the same exact way as other applicants to ensure consistency and fairness.
NZ Immigration Officials do not have to respond to this article or requests about this woman's illegitimate complaints. In fact, they should penalize her for NOT following through with the laws and push her application to the end of the line!
As for PK#9, if you can prove that it was NZ Immigration who was wreckless w/ your wife's application via documented chronology of events, I assure you, the court will side w/ your case to get you reimbursed.
This article was obviously written w/ 2 classes in mind -- the one class where people feel that they are special and are deserved to be treated differently, and the other class where everyone is treated equally regardless of whether or not they are known publicly for their works. Marina Lewycka certainly feels that she is a rather "special" person who belongs to the earlier class and therefore, is entitled to bypass all NZ immigration regulations.
Given her Ukrainian background and life experiences, it is rather Kafkaesque that she critizes the exact country that she is trying to get acceptance to. Based on the concensus comments posted on this page, it is clear that she should learn to be more respectful of the laws and be less "ridiculous" and less "absurd" about her needs!
NZ Immigration should neither modify nor reduce any of their earlier requirements they have asked of her and her husband as this would be unfair to the rest of applicants.
NZ IS a can-do society, so stop bleating and do what is required. Why do people think that publicity will help their cause? All it does, to me, is not want whingers in my country. Real Kiwis get on with the job, are understated and play by the rules
Great marketing ploy to gain exposure of her book.
@ Nik #18...welcome :)
PK is spot on. I am going through the residency process at the moment, due to immigration giving me and my husband incorrect information, led to our Visa's almost expiring, we would have has to take unpaid leave from our jobs that we have held for over two years, which would have ment we would have had no income to pay our mortgage, our bills or food. We had to pay again for a different visa, which arrived on our doorstep the day after our original visa's expired, thankfully we can still work in NZ, however they issued us with the wrong visa, and we now need to pay all over again for the right ones. Immigration do not give a monkeys who they upset they are sitting rubbing their hand together counting the cash they make from the innocent public. We have lived and worken in NZ for two and a half years, we pay our taxes, we pay our rates, we are law abilding citizens, we have a mortgage, my Daughter attands school, we pay her fee's every year, and also every fund raising event sh has at school. We feel totally violated by the immigration service, who can still decline our residency application, and if they do we will need to pay for it all again. For those of you out there who do not think this is a big deal, call the call centre a couple of times with the same enquiry, I guarantee you will not be told the same thing twice. It is an Utter farce, and a money generationg scheme!!!!
Lil Wayne sentencing postponed
Fox used hand double for sexy ad
Eva Longoria in porn Tweet mishap
Horror movies causes panic attacks
Angelina Jolie visits quake-hit Haiti
Piecing together the Lost puzzle
Beyonce, Alicia film video in slum
Lindsay Lohan's Jesus Christ pose
The anger and poetry of Gil Scott-Heron
Jackson death conspiracy claims
Govt poised to make taxi safety measures compulsory
Key 'no GST rise' video emerges
Grave fears for woman with wanted man
Principal accused of sunburn bribe
Beyonce, Alicia film video in slum
36 years to pay back WINZ after fraud
Harlem Globetrotters play game on ice rink
Dubai tower shut after visitors stuck in elevator
Paranormal Activity too scary for Italians
Eva Longoria in porn Tweet mishap
Lindsay Lohan's Jesus Christ pose
110,000 calls, texts intercepted in drugs op
Teen 'will go to jail' rather than give up injured dog
Daily trivia quiz: February 10
'Very white' Australian rugby cops criticism
Ex-All Blacks star apologises for groping teenager
Kong movie ship scuttled in strait
Pattinson sex scenes 'disturbing'
Teen 'will go to jail' rather than give up injured dog
Key confirms GST increase being considered
A pass for Key, but much more to do
Sanzar and Sky decide it's time to titillate the fans
Time for young gun Aaron Cruden to fire
Newest First
Oldest First
After living in New Zealand as a single parent, paying my taxes and school fees, after school care fees and numerous extra's - I was declined a new work permit as WINZ said they had people who could do my job. This is the same job that only I had been doing for 2 years - the only position of it's kind in the country - dealing with a very sensitive government contract. That didn't matter. It didn't matter that I had paid all the fees for the applications, medicals and everything else. I was still told to leave immediately. I had to pack a suitcase each for myself and my 9 year old daughter and leave EVERYTHING else behind. Every cent I had earned in New Zealand stayed in New Zealand. The job that I was doing was actually contributing to the national safety of the millions of 'KIWI's' that don't work but would rather complain that the migrants need to leave. I would love someone to compare the hours worked by migrants and kiwi's. How many sick days are taken? How much annual leave is taken? Two years in a row I had to give up my annual leave to work as the kiwi's were all on leave. The migrants are partially responsible for making New Zealand the country that it is. But that won't stop Immigration from kicking us out. Only once you are someone and make a big deal about the mistakes that Immigration make do you get any assistance. For me, a normal hard working migrant - I couldn't fight for what I have worked really hard for - I had to give up my dream and destroy my child's future.