Jackson named Diana Ross guardian

Last updated 07:40 02/07/2009
Diana Ross and Michael Jackson 2002
FRIENDS TOGETHER 2002: Michael Jackson named his friend Diana Ross as a possible guardian for his children if his mother was unwilling or unable to look after them.

Michael Jackson will revealed

Related Links

Jackson body to go to Neverland - reports Jackson's body to return to Neverland Stevie Wonder pays tribute to Michael Jackson Jackson fans gather in Harlem Jackson's funeral plans sketchy Jackson mourned at Neverland Michael Jackson's will PDF

Relevant offers

Celebrities

Houston's drug records sought Houston's room already re-occupied Can Paris Hilton save her image? Jamie Oliver uncovers treasure Rihanna urged to stay away from Brown Whitney death sparks rush for music Lopez forks out for beau's new look Whitney to have private memorial Lady Gaga confirms second show SI Swimsuit cover unveiled

Details of Michael Jackson's will are emerging, with all of his multimillion-dollar estate being placed in a family trust, even as plans for his highly anticipated funeral remained sketchy.

The will, signed in 2002, estimates his estate at that time to be worth in excess of $500 million and was filed with a Los Angeles Court.

In it, Jackson leaves his entire estate to the Michael Jackson Family Trust, which ultimately benefits his three children, mother and unnamed charities.

Jackson's 79-year-old mother, Katherine Jackson, is nominated to be guardian of Jackson's children Prince Michael I, 12, Paris Michael Katherine, 11 and Prince Michael II, seven, and if she should be unwilling and unable to be guardian, Jackson nominated his friend, pop star Diana Ross, to be the children's guardian.

The five-page document said "I have intentionally omitted to provide for my former wife, Deborah Rowe Jackson."

The will names Los Angeles-based attorney John Branca, a long-time Jackson counsel, and music industry executives John McClain and accountant Barry Siegel as co-executors, but Siegel resigned as a co-executor in 2003, leaving the administration of the will to Branca and McClain.

Jackson's will has been the subject of much speculation since the pop star died last Thursday, age 50, after suffering cardiac arrest at his rented Los Angeles home.

NEVERLAND OUT AS BURIAL SITE?

The pop star whose 1982 record Thriller is the best-selling album of all time left behind an estate that includes part ownership in a Beatles music catalogue and his own music company that held rights to some of his music.

He was said to be as much as $500 million in debt when he died, but his assets have been reported to be worth as much as $1 billion.

That value could rise over time if his popularity in death grows, as with other entertainers like Elvis Presley.

Meanwhile, the Los Angeles Times reported that Jackson's body will not be buried at his Neverland Ranch in Central California due to legal regulations about private residence burials.

California Highway Patrol spokesman, officer Miguel Luevano, told Reuters that late on Tuesday, CHP officials  met with Jackson's family.

Ad Feedback

The CHP and Jacksons "discussed some options, and at this point the family has still to decide what they want to do and where they want to go," Luevano said.

A spokesman for the Santa Barbara County Fire Department, David Sadecki, said his office was still planning "as if something was going to take place tomorrow" but he had no further details and added that his office has not talked directly to Jackson's family.

The Times said plans for a memorial service may be shifted to Los Angeles' huge Staples Center arena, but that could not immediately be confirmed.

- Reuters

 

6 comments
Post a comment
tweetymom   #6   11:28 pm Jul 03 2009

while i think that #4 may have some valid points and i am NOT a michael jackson fan, in some respects he was a very political figure in terms on his songs in the 90's early 2000's and the pure fact that he was such a leader in the entertainment industry means he will get a lot of coverage. I just wish that they gave the same sort of coverage to other celebrities who have also passed on recently who have also made a big difference in other peoples lives, like farrah fawcet and others.

Mick   #5   01:41 pm Jul 02 2009

In response to #1

No, it just shows how much his plastic surgery cost...

Blair   #4   12:21 pm Jul 02 2009

Who cares?! It shows how shallow the world has got that this self absorbed, spoilt brat entertainer (yes, folks he wasn't a saint or heroic figure or any of those other things that the media have painted him as)has dominated the headlines with his (possibly) self inflicted death last week. In the meantime Iran stands on the precipice but what the hell they weren't entertainers so its probably too much to ask the MSM to give us the same coverage of what is a somewhat important world event!

accountant   #3   12:08 pm Jul 02 2009

The figures keep changing last week they said 500mil now a billion!?

e   #2   11:52 am Jul 02 2009

his worth cannot be measured in dollars.

james   #1   11:26 am Jul 02 2009

He was worth only a billion dollars!?!?!? Shows how much the records labels bled him dry!

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content