Debate rages over Jackson's will

SANDY COHEN
Last updated 05:00 05/08/2012
Michael Jackson family
Reuters

Randy, Rebbie and Janet Jackson say the executors of Michael Jackson's will are causing harm and dispute the legality of the document.

Michael Jackson
Michael Jackson.

Relevant offers

Celebrities

Dear North, tell the paps to go but chat with mum first Mila Kunis, Ashton Kutcher welcome second baby Katy Perry: 'I'm fighting for everyone in 2017' The crazy world of Thane Kirby Matilda not having her dad Heath Ledger 'won't ever be right' - Michelle Williams Kiwi funnyman Josh Thomson dive-bombed by aggressive magpies Bruno Mars offers 24K advice on how to create a funky album Fawlty Towers' Manuel, Andrew Sachs, dies at 86 Megan Massacre visits New Zealand for the largest tattoo festival in Australasia Ed Sheeran debuts his right royal scar at concert

Janet, Randy and Rebbie Jackson say the executors of Michael Jackson's will are causing harm by damaging "fundamental family relationships" and isolating matriarch Katherine Jackson "from anyone questioning the validity of Michael's will".

The Jackson siblings released a statement yesterday (NZ time) through an attorney amid a fight over their brother's will with the executors of his estate. Jackson died on June 25, 2009.

On Friday, a judge declared TJ Jackson, a cousin to Michael Jackson's three children, as co-guardian with Katherine Jackson, who was named their sole caretaker in the disputed will.

Janet, Randy and Rebbie Jackson accuse the executors of a "relentless" negative media campaign and say they have been barred from visiting their 82-year-old mother or Jackson's children.

"The effect of that notice not only is to damage fundamental family relationships, it is also to isolate Katherine Jackson from anyone questioning the validity of Michael's will," reads the statement by Janet Jackson's attorney, Blair G Brown, released on behalf of Janet, Randy and Rebbie Jackson.

They say they will continue to contest Michael Jackson's will because "the executors have never explained how Michael could have signed his will in California on a date that irrefutable evidence establishes that he was in New York".

Representatives for the executors of the will did not immediately respond to calls and emails requesting comment. However, representatives for executors John Branca and John McClain released a statement some weeks ago saying, "any doubts about the validity of Michael's will and his selection of executors were thoroughly and completely debunked two years ago when a challenge was rejected by the Los Angeles County Superior Court, the California Court of Appeals and, finally, the California Supreme Court".

Janet, Randy and Rebbie Jackson say they will continue to contest Michael Jackson's will, adding, "they stand nothing to gain financially by a finding that the will is invalid".

"The individuals who have the most to lose by a finding that the will is invalid are, of course, the executors and those on the executors' payroll."

The siblings say they will "press forward in their search for the truth in order to carry out the wishes of their brother Michael".

Ad Feedback

- AP

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content