Us Weekly's gross Kim K zoom function

JESSICA GROSE
Last updated 14:03 19/12/2013
Kim Kardashian
Reuters
AMAZING: A photo of Kim Kardashian without the zoom function, and yet you can still see her.

Related Links

Kim K furious at South Park 'Hobbit' episode Kim's X-rated Xmas gift for Kanye

Relevant offers

Celebrities

Dear North, tell the paps to go but chat with mum first Ronan Keating and wife welcome first baby together Disney star Michael Mantenuto found dead Guardians of the Galaxy director James Gunn hints at New Zealand visit Kim Kardashian held back tears on The Ellen Show as she described her Paris ordeal The Bachelor NZ: Chat live with New Zealand's most eligible bloke, Zac Franich Sean Bean's favourite death scene was shot in New Zealand, as Boromir in Lord of the Rings Ex-Shortland Street star KJ Apa and Cole Sprouse put their bromance to the test Fashion secrets from celebrity stylist Elizabeth Saltzman Former Shortland Street star KJ Apa got death threats over involvement in A Dog's Purpose

I was not aware that Us Weekly's online photos had a "zoom in" function until The Cut's Isabel Wilkinson tweeted about it this morning and linked to a photo of Kim Kardashian's "Stunning Post-Baby Curves!"

Us Weekly has long been obsessed with women's gestating and postpartum bodies, but the magazine uses peppy, complimentary language-"the reality star, 33, is back in tip-top, super-sexy bikini shape six months after the birth of daughter North West" -to mask the fact that it's just putting up these photos for us to judge and shame.

You rock, Kim! Now let me check out your thighs.

The zoom feature makes the whole enterprise more explicit, and grosser. "Zoom in"-which has been around for about a year, and yet somehow eluded my notice-is only the default setting on some photos. No, you can't zoom in on a photo of Kim pregnant (yuck) or of Brad and Angelina (old); yes, you can zoom in on a slideshow of the Victoria's Secret fashion show and Jessica Simpson showing off her "slim, sexy legs."

And, yes, when I move my mouse over the photo of Kim's post-baby bikini bod, her posterior pops out for my perusal. The commenters are, predictably, vicious.

They accuse Kardashian, variously, of photoshopping the photos to remove cellulite, of having a butt that's too big for flaunting, and of overdoing it on the plastic surgery. (We reached out to Us Weekly, but the magazine declined to comment.)

Obviously Kardashian has profited off the tabloids'-and our culture's-demented relationship with women's bodies. But it's one thing to publish endless photographs of postpartum women in bikinis.

It's another to put an icon of a magnifying glass next to the photograph and invite us to zoom in on every pore. The website could at least be honest about what it's doing, in the manner of Star, which publishes its best and worst beach bodies with crude circles around any stray patch of cellulite on otherwise slender forms.

Ad Feedback

It's somehow more offensive for Us to have that "you go girl" patina while encouraging readers to put every body part under a microscope.

-Slate

Comments

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content