Maleficent a modern classic

Last updated 05:00 31/05/2014

FIERY: Angelina Jolie turns in a powerful performance as the title character in Disney's Maleficent.

Relevant offers


Fox News commentator strikes back after receiving death threats for Star Wars joke Ed Sheeran in Bridget Jones cameo Chris Hemsworth starves himself for Heart of the Sea role Captain America and Iron Man turn foes in trailer for Captain America: Civil War Deleted Love Actually scene shows hidden lesbian love story Review: Love the Coopers From Mad Max to Trainwreck - 5 movies to be thankful for in 2015 Youth also offers Harvey Keitel a chance to reflect on his movie career Pukeko Pictures signs China deal with Chinese animation company Jack Black discusses getting Goosebumps


Directed by Robert Stromberg


Maleficent is Disney revisiting its own Sleeping Beauty

Maleficent was the villain of the piece in the 1959 original. She was the archetypal evil witch, who casts the spell that sends the virtuous princess off to the land of nod. In Sleeping Beauty, Maleficent's "evil" goes pretty much unexplained. We know that she was excluded from the young princess's christening, but that always did seem like scant reason for going quite as troppo as she does. She's just "bad" says Sleeping Beauty,and the various fairy tales that film drew from, and that's all the audience were ever to know.

Maleficent, via a quite beautifully fashioned back-story, posits her as a woman much wronged. Once the most powerful of the fairies, tasked with protecting the natural world from too much human incursion, she challenged the human king, and was cruelly robbed of her wings. She is, quite literally, cast down. 
Butchered, betrayed, embittered; this is the woman who vows revenge on the king by cursing his daughter. Even then she gives the princess an escape clause: The curse can be broken by "true love's kiss", but this is poetic justice for the king, who once promised exactly that kiss to the young Maleficent.

There is so much be said about the cleverness, the boldness, and the wit of Linda Woolverton's (The Lion KingAlice in Wonderland) screenplay. It rigorously and perfectly does everything we might expect a Disney epic to do. There are laughs, terrifically engaging characters, some stunning set pieces, and an utterly satisfying resolution. At that level, Maleficent is vintage Disney, equal to any of the studio's recent best work. 

But Maleficent does something else, and it's this that makes the film so admirable: I've sat through a decade and more of Tolkien adaptations for which the filmmakers had to invent female characters, just to conform to some spurious studio need for a "love interest", and every week I watch films - for kids and adults - in which the female characters are nothing but accessories or objects for the male characters to chase, fight over, or belittle. Maleficent turns it all on its head. 

Here nearly all the significant characters are women. 

Maleficent reclaims the "evil witch" archetype, and rewrites her as the wise woman struggling against the stupidity of greedy men. It's overdue, it's deftly done, and it happens within a film that still ticks every box an audience of littlies could ask for.

I turned up at Maleficent expecting good story-telling, spectacular visuals, a performance of dark and fiery pulchritude from Angelina Jolie, and I got all that. This is a gorgeous looking film, only slightly let down by a typically dark 3D transfer, while Jolie is truly fantastic, and her co-stars all do their work like good'uns. 

Ad Feedback

What I wasn't expecting to see was a feminist reclamation of an entire fairytale tradition, all the way back to that one set in the Garden of Eden. 

Maleficent is a dazzling and engaging film. I honestly believe it is a modern classic.

- The Dominion Post


Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content