Queen a no-show at Bones premiere

By DAVE BURGESS - The Dominion Post
Last updated 13:11 25/11/2009
0 of 0

Related Links

Royal reception for Lovely Bones Jackson's Tintin internet adventure Susan Sarandon heads to Wellington Film needed more violence, Jackson says Jackson looking forward to 'proud' premiere Spielberg's Tintin 'in the can'

Relevant offers

Film

Kong movie ship scuttled in strait Pattinson sex scenes 'disturbing' Bridges unhappy on Iron Man set Matt Damon's South African accent issues Boy, you have to see Taika's new film A bullet with your name on it? MacGyver creator tries to block film Film review: Invictus Film review: Nine Cameron reveals Avatar 2 plans

LATEST: The royal film performance and world premiere of Peter Jackson's The Lovely Bones is missing one important person - Queen Elizabeth II.

The Queen selected The Lovely Bones to screen at the royal performance in London this morning. It is the one time a year the monarch gets to officially visit the cinema.

However, the Queen did not take her place at the sold out Odeon in Leicester Square.

The royal family was instead represented by Prince Charles and his wife Camilla, the Duchess of Cornwall.

They were joined on the red carpet by Jackson, and the stars of the film including Mark Wahlberg, Rachel Weisz, Susan Sarandon, Stanley Tucci and Saoirse Ronan.

Guardian.co.uk film reviewer Xan Brooks said the film was "handsomely made and strongly acted, while its woozy, lullaby ambience recalls Jackson's work on the brilliant Heavenly Creatures, before he set forth on his epic voyage through The Lord of the Rings."

But he gave The Lovely Bones only two stars out of five, calling it "infuriatingly coy".

The Sun newspaper was more effusive in its praise, calling The Lovely Bones "the best film of next year".

"[Jackson] creates something even more amazing than his Middle-earth fantasy. The effects are breathtaking."

In another rave review, Harry Knowles at Ain't It Cool News said: "This is an incredibly lovely film. From the visuals to the performances to the story-telling and film work ... it all goes to capture a very powerful story in a way that makes you want to hug those close to you."

Ad Feedback
16 comments
Post a comment
Keith   #16   09:34 am Nov 30 2009

Republican #1.

Okay, so you obviously believe the Queen should have cancelled her attendance at the Commonwealth Heads Of Government meeting in Trinidad just to attend the premiere of the latest film by Peter Jackson in London - and the fact that she didn't do this is clearly some kind of outrageous insult to New Zealand?

Get serious.

Jon   #15   10:50 am Nov 26 2009

Republican...

What are you on about? it's a film story in the entertainment section you muppet.

Megan   #14   01:15 am Nov 26 2009

The Queen is in Bermuda - a little far to travel to the theatre

Karl   #13   09:17 pm Nov 25 2009

The queen saw the trailer and was not amused.

Maria   #12   07:11 pm Nov 25 2009

Phantasma, what are you talking about. Peter Jackson adapted The Lord of the Rings didn't he? And that sure wasn't a 'million dollars going down the gurgler'.

Des   #11   04:23 pm Nov 25 2009

@ Phantasma - what an odd comment - where on earth do you get that impression from? I have seen Vitners Luck, and i can almost 100% tell you now (without seeing The Lovely Bones yet) that this will not be in the same class. Are you Nikki Caro or Keisha Castle Hughes by any chance? :)

Republican   #10   04:17 pm Nov 25 2009

God save the queen. She's our head of state but obviously doesn't care about good old NZ. The thing that really annoyed me was the royal family's refusal to send someone to Sir Edmund Hillary's funeral. What do we need them for? It's time to become a repulic. We just need someone with leadership. Not smiling Mr Key who says NZ will become a republic somebday, but he sure ain't gonna do it. Nice job.

Mark   #9   03:58 pm Nov 25 2009

Seems stuff.co.nz forgot to put of picture of Peter Jackson in the slide show at the top. Isn't Peter one of the main reasons that this is being reported in NZ! Shame on Stuff!

Label   #8   03:55 pm Nov 25 2009

Wow Phantasma, what a narrow viewpoint. Where is it written that an adaptation must be slavish to a novel? Film is a different medium with its own distinct requirements for storytelling. Sounds like this will be a divisive film, can't wait to hear a broader reaction. Bravo Peter for making what seems like it will be a strong and challenging work.

Phantasma   #7   03:36 pm Nov 25 2009

Sounds like another multi-million dollars gone down the gurgler! It's another Vintner's Luck! Why can't these Kiwi directors adapt novels? Dont they read?


Show 1-6 of 16 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you sign in, you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers
Opinion poll

Do you want to see a fifth Indiana Jones film?

Yes - Indiana Jones rules

No - The last one sucked

Vote Result

Related story: Harrison Ford committed to Indy

Featured Promotions