Would you pay $65 for to see a movie?

JOCELYN NOVECK
Last updated 05:00 28/06/2013
Paramount NZ

In cinemas from June 20: World War Z

Relevant offers

Film

NZ Film Festival: Send us your reviews Chris Hemsworth's biggest challenge What to see at the movies this weekend? What kids can learn from Harry Potter The talented Mr Levinson The Dark Horse: An instant Kiwi classic Nothing kinky on Fifty Shades website Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles' 9/11 promo fail Marvel cranks up sarcasm for Guardians of Galaxy 'Racist' casting claim for Ridley Scott's Exodus

So this was the deal: For US$50 (NZ$65), you got to see Brad Pitt's hotly anticipated zombie thriller World War Z before all your friends. You also got 3D glasses to keep, popcorn and sodas, a poster, the DVD when it comes out, and an intimate dinner with Brad.

Just kidding! No dinner with Brad.

But hundreds of fans did pay US$50 for the other stuff last week in a small-scale marketing experiment in five theatres - and the studio, Paramount Pictures, says it worked well.

With all the recent talk about future movie ticket prices climbing into the stratosphere, is it a harbinger of things to come?

Before you scoff, it's worth noting that premium pricing happens all the time: in Broadway theatres, where you could get second-row seats for Tom Hanks in Lucky Guy this week if you paid US$300 a pop, or at concerts, where you could pay well over US$1000 for, say, a Rolling Stones VIP package.

At Yankee Stadium, a top-tier Legends seat can also top US$1000 per game, but season holders can get perks like a free trip to spring training.

Still, the idea of US$50 for a movie strikes a lot of fans the wrong way.

"That's my dinner," noted a Philadelphia moviegoer, Cheyanne Farmer, 15. "That's my allowance," added Rahyaan Hall, her friend. "For a month."

In New York though, one fan did some quick calculating and saw a reasonable value. "With the DVD and all those other things you mention, it probably comes to more than US$50," said Alex Leighton, 24, who'd just bought tickets to World War Z. ''So you're getting more than the movie."

That's the point that Paramount wants to make.

"This ended up being a headline that didn't really represent what the offer was," says Megan Colligan, the studio's president of domestic distribution and marketing. "These people stepped up and made their commitment to us, and we gave them a great experience."

That experience, which involved just one show each at five theaters across the country, included not merely seeing the film two days early and the free stuff; the "mega-ticket" buyers also got to bring friends along at regular price and they got a party atmosphere, including a DJ and photo booths.

Colligan says that four of the theatres sold out - they averaged 250 seats each - and one was 80 per cent full. She wouldn't get more specific in terms of revenue, but said: "It was a fun, positive experience for everyone."

The offer might have gone largely unnoticed, had it not been for its timing: The special showings came just a few days after Hollywood heavyweights Steven Spielberg and George Lucas, speaking at the University of Southern California, issued dire predictions about the future of movie prices, with Lucas estimating tickets could end up at "$50, maybe $100, maybe $150," and Spielberg predicting differentiated pricing according to a film's budget - with the next Iron Man costing $25 perhaps, but the next Lincoln costing $7.

How realistic were those projections? As for the Lucas estimates, there's no way prices could reach that high, says Tom Adams, analyst and director of US media for IHS Electronics & Media.

Ad Feedback

"I just don't see what we could add to the experience to make it worth that much," he says.

But differentiated pricing is much more realistic, he says. "When you think of it, it's strange to have an industry where every product costs the same, no matter how good or popular," he says.

"I think consumers are smart - they can figure out that Avatar costs a lot more to make than a romantic comedy. And we see with 3D movies that price flexibility is possible, for a different viewing experience."

At Paramount, Colligan points out that her studio's US$50 experiment is not really about Lucas' dire price projections, but about the need to find new, creative ways to market the movie experience, both in theaters and at home.

"This is all part of wanting to take risks, to develop new strategies of how we do business," she says. "There's going to be more experimenting to come. You can't do what you did 10 years ago and have the same results."

The advantages of a "mega-ticket"-like scheme, if people go for it, are clear for the studio (Paramount partnered with Regal Entertainment Group, the large movie-theatre circuit). First, you get customers buying the DVD at the same time they see the movie, rather than buying it later and only if they really loved the film.

Perhaps even more important, you help generate early buzz, with moviegoers spreading the news on social networks two days before opening. It's like having theatres full of critics ready to post their reviews - but here, the critics are fans, predisposed to loving the film.

The upside for fans? They get to see the film early - not a small thing, depending on the fan and the movie. It may work even better for instalments of huge franchises, mused Leighton, the New York movie fan, and his friend, Florian Baier, 22.

"I wouldn't have done it for this movie, but maybe for the next 'Star Wars' film or maybe Lord of the Rings,' Leighton said. "I'd also be checking the online reviews - I'd have to know the movie was good."

Added Baier: "I wouldn't do it for the DVD. That is not a draw." Leighton agreed: "There are easier ways to watch online. If I even have the time."

Note to studios: Maybe you should think about offering that dinner with Brad, after all.

- AP

Comments

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content