Robert Redford plays down Oscar snub

PIYA SINHA-ROY
Last updated 05:00 18/01/2014
Robert redford

NOT ACKNOWLEDGED: Robert Redford in All is Lost.

Relevant offers

Film

Review: Steve Jobs Wellington ratepayers to be consulted on Wellington Movie Museum and Convention Centre Zoolander 2: Ben Stiller takes world's biggest selfie at premiere Hamilton filmmaker to Tropfest Don't tell James Bond, but he was actually driving an Aston Martin Vantage N430 Review: Anomalisa 'Three Wise Cousins' racks up more than $196k at box office Nicholas Sparks' The Choice gets utterly panned for relying on 'cheap emotion' The 10 unknown actors who could be household names by the end of 2016 New documentary 'Hautoa Ma' examines the rise of Maori film

Robert Redford may have been one of the noteworthy exclusions in Thursday's Oscar nominations, but as the actor-director kicked off the 30th edition of his Sundance Film Festival, he made the point that film is not all about Hollywood anyway.

A leading man in the 1970s and 1980s, Redford created the annual Sundance gathering in Park City, Utah, to give an outlet to independent film making and creativity brewing outside of the big studios.

Speaking at his annual press conference, Redford said he did not want the fact that he had not received an Academy Award nomination for his role in  ''All is Lost'' to detract from the festival.

But in explaining why the movie was not recognised by Oscar voters, he put the blame on the studio behind the film, Lionsgate.

''We suffered from little to no distribution, so as a result, our distributors, I don't know why, they didn't want to spend the money, they were afraid or they just weren't capable,'' said the 77-year-old Redford, who has won two Oscars. Neither was for acting.

''We had no campaign to help us cross over into the mainstream, so I suspect that had something to do with it. Would it have been wonderful to be nominated? Of course. But I'm not disturbed or upset by it,'' he added.

But Redford was upset by a recent article published in the New York Times that suggested Sundance's growing crop of films that are acquired from the festival and receive theatrical releases are not always beneficial to the movie theater business.

Redford criticised the author of the article, saying ''that person was wrong,'' referring to critic Manohla Dargis.

''There was an article recently in a paper that seems to suggest that Sundance isn't what it could be or what it was. And they were implying that was because of box office receipts, and lack of financial reasons. That's not who we are. It's got nothing to do with who we are, we are non-profit,'' Redford said.

''We're not interested in the money of it, that's somebody else's business.''

Ad Feedback

- Reuters

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content