Film review: The Taking of Pelham 123

BY GRAEME TUCKETT
Last updated 10:44 11/09/2009
pelham
BIG NAMES: Denzel Washington and John Travolta star in The Taking of Pelham 123.

Relevant offers

Film reviews

Film review: Weekend Film review: The Artist Film review: Chronicle A heartfelt, cathartic journey Film review: Journey 2: The Mysterious Island Film review: The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo Film review: Young Adult Film review: The Descendants Review: Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy Review: Sione's 2


Tony Scott (Top Gun, The Last Boy Scout) knows how to throw his cameras and stunt-performers around better than almost any other jobbing director.

He has made good films (True Romance) and bloody awful ones (Domino), but never a film that was boring to look at, and The Taking of Pelham 123 does nothing to challenge the reputation of Ridley's hyperactive little brother.

The film is an efficient, occasionally funny and kinetic as hell retread of a much-respected 1974 movie.

Purists and film bores will bang on about the remake's inferiority to the original, but since I was the only person in the cinema who was even born in 1974, I figure: who cares?

The hijacking of a New York subway car is competently staged, the violence is sudden and acceptably realistic, and the performances from Travolta, Washington, and Turturro are exactly what you were expecting.

Pelham 123 loses all credibility in the last 20 minutes, and a twist I was waiting for never arrived, but the film is still an enjoyable waste of a few hours of your life.

All that, and a cameo from James Gandolfini. What's not to like?

The Taking of Pelham 123
Director: Tony Scott
Starring: John Travolta, Denzel Washington, John Turturro
Rated: R16
Time: 106 minutes
Trailer: Flicks.co.nz

* What did you think? Post your comments below.

Ad Feedback

- © Fairfax NZ News

3 comments
Post a comment
huhu   #3   03:31 pm Sep 27 2009

This is better in your opinion than inglourious basterds -"Pelham 123 loses all credibility in the last 20 minutes, and a twist I was waiting for never arrived, but the film is still an enjoyable waste of a few hours of your life" seems like you are using a diffrent yard stick for this film .

hamish   #2   12:03 pm Sep 16 2009

this is the 3rd remake and is just showy and OTT with FX chases and noise......the older ones are more subtle and allow the actors to do the work rather than the technical people...I found it a noisey bore

CRMWWelly   #1   08:57 am Sep 15 2009

This should not have gotten more stars than inglourious basterds.

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content

Reeling

Reeling - Margaret Agnew on movies

Enough about quakes, back to movies