TV review: News outlets snipe over Bain verdict

BY JANE BOWRON
Last updated 11:10 12/06/2009
YES! Wendy Petrie is caught in an off-camera moment.

Related Links

Wendy Petrie fist pump video hits net Wendy Petrie 'fist pump' video removed

Relevant offers

TV

Freeview adds new channel A Sheep's Show How many chances for Once Upon a Time? Entertainment Quiz 10/2 House to end after current season Rescued dog bites TV host during broadcast DeGeneres hits back at haters Curb or Seinfeld: which is better? More claims about PM's man and doco funding Excuse me, I was just wondering ...

Usually the two competing news channels refrain from taking swipes at each other but on Thursday night, TV3 couldn't resist having a go at the Petrie Dish.

With Bain ardour running at an all-time high - I keep expecting to see a David Bain doll appear in shops - a TV3 news reporter informed us that on Facebook pro-Bain fans are calling for David to be a contestant on next year's Dancing With The Stars, and added that perhaps he should partner up with TV One news anchor Wendy Petrie.

On the night the verdict was returned, Petrie had been flown to Christchurch to report live from outside the courthouse - muscling out the reporter who'd done the hard three months' slog - and, after successfully completing a live cross, was caught on camera committing a professional foul, yanking her right arm and crying "Yes!"

Having only a passing interest in men's fashion I have been astonished at the running fashion spread we have been treated to of the Bain doll on the nightly news.

We have seen David in his lovely dark cashmere coat, and in a leather jacket swinging a golf club against a backdrop of Christchurch's last autumn leaves.

These images of Bain enjoying his not-guilty freedom come with equally astonishing calls to the public to donate to the David Bain fund.

Perhaps the most shocking image to grace our screens during the trial reportage was the spectacle of numero uno Bain supporter Joe Karam handling exhibits in the courtroom.

This is a task which should be performed only by court attendants rather than acted out by someone who is on the defence pay roll and who has written three books about the accused.

Surely allowing Karam to demonstrate how a gun might have been held in front of the jury can only be seen as deeply compromising.

But I suppose it is only right and fitting for a man who earlier in the week, in a lengthy interview with John Campbell, compared himself to Socrates.

To quote: "I made a point in my second book - actually it was a point Socrates made 3000 years - four or 5000 years ago when he said: 'Don't worry about why I might be saying something - have a listen to what I'm saying' and of course what he said laid the foundation for modern civilisation - even though he was hung for it at the time."

This utterance came after an assertion by Karam that the media were/are jealous of him because when he first became involved in the case, "the media thought I was finding an excuse to write a book and I stole their story".

Ad Feedback

"It was Joe Karam's story, not theirs, and they tried to pick holes in it rather than listen and read it and understand it."

When Campbell asked Karam why, in spite of the not-guilty verdict, 53 per cent of people in a Herald poll still believed David Bain was guilty, Karam replied that those polled were either basing their opinion on inherent prejudice, or only on "the snippets" reported in newspapers and on TV.

According to Karam, only the people who were in the courtroom every day are entitled to be the cognoscenti, the holders of the truth, not any QC or any of the "Johnny-come-latelies" who hadn't done serious trial time and were therefore getting their evidence from, "the front page of some newspaper or other".

Such comprehensive and scathing criticism of the fourth estate is surprising when you remember Paul Holmes championing Karam on Holmes after the launch of his first book, and Campbell's own gushy outpourings of exultation when Bain was first liberated from his incarceration.

Several times during the three- segment Campbell Live interview Karam curiously referred to himself in the third person, speaking of how, during an earlier defamation trial, "Karam won the lot, the police lost the lot" - patronisingly adding that "you would have thought they would have learnt their lesson by now".

Karam also maintained that the police had an obsession with him, that, "the police tried to shut Karam down but like a phoenix I would rise up again". Identifying himself as Joe Karam rather than using the conventional I or me is unusual.

If Karam is knighted, as some people are divining, after watching this lot, "Sir" will become even more insufferable. With the trial finally over, Karam, who has become the "Bain" of our lives, will be out of our faces until the inevitable film is released.

I wonder who they'll get to play Karam? I hear Danny DeVito is free.

* What do you think? Post your comments below.

- © Fairfax NZ News

17 comments
Post a comment
Cass   #17   09:19 am Jun 20 2009

Fantastic column. I couldn't believe it when Karam said "I couldn't have done it without David". Oh good lord. The man needs to stop it!

I hope David Bain's cult settles somewhere remote and rural so the public doesn't have to deal with the constant fawning anymore.

rust   #16   05:38 pm Jun 17 2009

A refreshingly accurate and astute piece of journalism. Good to see not everyone has their head stuck in the sand

K   #15   11:49 am Jun 16 2009

Jane, I wholeheartedly agree with you.

David Bain was found not guilty because his well paid lawyers pleaded a case that caused doubt. It does not mean he was innocent.

The Privy Council did not find him innocent - otherwise it would've thrown the whole case out of court. It actually ordered a re-trial because there was reasonable evidence provided for a case.

I was rather ashamed of some of the media's handling - like they were cheerleaders in this whole sorry saga.

In the meantime, five people lie dead in a Dunedin cemetery...

ashtron   #14   12:06 am Jun 15 2009

Reviewers can say whatever they like. Good on you for doing so, Jane. Who was found not-guilty here? It was Bain, not Karam. Karam appears like an arrogant dude to me, placing himself in the middle of every camera shot possible. And it's nothing to do with the way the media present him, it's to do with the way he presents himself.

Jenn   #13   02:43 pm Jun 13 2009

Socrates wasn't hung... he was given poison hemlock. And I'm sure the David Bain doll isn't far away... maybe after the movie

Ally   #12   12:35 pm Jun 13 2009

Bad move TVNZ... Jack DID do the hard slog on the reporting for 3 months...then you fly in a 'barbie doll' to report... poor Jack! and what a digusting gesture from Wendy.

Sally   #11   08:44 am Jun 13 2009

To Shellz. David Bain was not found inncoent by the Privy Council (they made no ruling on his guilt or otherwise at all). He was not found innocent in his retrial either. He was found not guilty. There is a difference.

sophie   #10   10:40 pm Jun 12 2009

Brilliant piece of writing, entertaining and engaging. Note to #2, David Bain was not "found innocent by the Privy Council". The Privy Council granted David Bain the right to another trial. Huge difference.

Michael   #9   10:23 pm Jun 12 2009

Frankly, Bowron's comments illustrate the problem that the media now wants to be the news rather than reporting it. Her strident defence of the "fourth estate" - oh puleese! which century are we in? - insults our understanding that the reporting is a reflection of the need for revenue rather than a reflection of the facts.

Dan   #8   04:38 pm Jun 12 2009

Re. "I keep expecting to see a David Bain doll appear in shops."

In the interests of keeping the conversation seemly, I'll just return that in my view, that comment is about as original as "Been there, done that, bought the T-Shirt."

Furthermore, if we want to speak the 'truth', then this 'editorial' sounds like a purely reactive point of view to me.

Joe Karam is easily reframed as a 'big noter' or whatever picture of him it is that the certain tracts of the media are attempting to paint. (Unsuccessfully, I might add, because that particular reframing collides directly with public opinion.)

In New Zealand, anyone who attempts to grandstand for a cause... (unless it is to parade 'ordinariness') is to be taken to task.

Karam has used grandstanding to win - to his cost. Here the same rule applied recently to other big noters:

(Any) All Black? Ordinary = Loved. Ed Hillary? Ordinary = Loved. Peter Jackson? Ordinary = Loved. Peter Blake? Ordinary = Loved. Russell Crowe? Hmmm not ordinary enough. Cut him down. Kiri Te Kanawa... Hmmm not ordinary, but we'll let her off for now with a cautionary warning. Joe Karam? Not ordinary. So he's a target.

Overall, Karam's deeper problem is that anyone who criticises any part of the media is inevitably going to have the hoary old 'Don't shoot the messenger' line hurled back at them.

But throwing a questionably worded snipe at someone is not journalism. This seems to be the case with this self-righteous diatribe from the Dom 'writer'. (I won't say 'Journalist'. That title has to be earned.)

Lets see if this 'Truth' is palatable.

Ritchie


Show 1-7 of 17 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers
Opinion poll

How do you feel about The Simpsons being renewed for a further two seasons?

Woohoo! Long may it reign

Doh! It should have ended ages ago

Meh.

Vote Result

Related story: (See story)

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content

On the Box blog pointer small

On the Box: What's on TV with Chris Philpott

How many chances for Once Upon a Time?