Plague of rats and stoats will devastate native wildlife this summer unless 1080 poison use is stepped up, the parliamentary commissioner for the environment says.
Jan Wright has called on all agencies responsible for pest management to work together to deal with the pending threat, which had come about because beech trees across the country are producing more seeds than usual.
This is known as a "mast" event.
It is expected to provide vast amounts of food for rats, helping them multiply. More rats also means more food for stoats and greater numbers of them too.
"These mast events happen periodically, and take a huge toll on our native birds, insects and lizards," Wright said. "1080 is the only tool we have to control the plagues of rats and stoats that follow."
Wright, who has been advocating for increased use of 1080 since 2010, said aerial applications were the best way to administer the "vast, tactical strike" needed to fight the coming plagues.
"If additional funds are needed to respond effectively to this mast, then it is important that these be found or we risk setting our conservation programme back decades."
The Department of Conservation has used aerial 1080 on only 8 per cent of the 1.8 million hectares it manages over the past five years.
This costs about $3.5 million a year.
Wright did not have an exact figure in mind, but said the Government would need to stump up a significant amount of cash to widen its programme.
"I've been saying they haven't been doing enough in the past, so . . . we're talking millions of dollar here."
A spokeswoman for Conservation Minister Nick Smith said he had asked DOC to consider Dr Wright's recommendations and report back to him early next year.
Waikato regional councillor Clyde Graf, who made the anti-1080 documentary Poisoning Paradise, said that Dr Wright was using the mast event as a convenient excuse to push for more aerial poisoning.
Such events had been happening since the beginning of time, and native wildlife had always survived, he said.
He suggested putting more money into ground-controlled trapping programmes instead, because it was difficult to target the right species with aerial drops.
"Pouring more 1080 across the forests will kill rats, but it will also target the species that are in danger."
There was still no sound scientific study that showed the net population of any native species benefited from the use of 1080, he said.
"1080, in my opinion, is certainly not helping the forests, it's harming them.
"It's non-targeted, indiscriminate killing of native wildlife."
Wright pointed to an Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) report released yesterday that found existing controls on 1080 were safe and effective.
Authority chairwoman Kerry Prendergast said the tighter management regime launched in 2007 was working well.
"The majority of incidents are now reported to the EPA by users of 1080 rather than by members of the public, as was the case when monitoring began in 2008."
Given that the new rules were working, there were no plans to reassess 1080.
- The Dominion Post
Which would you prefer?Related story: Natural burials the way to go
The cost of losing nature