Most popular names of 2009

Last updated 09:49 15/12/2009
child
Reuters
TOP CHOICE: Jacob and Emma were the most popular of the decade.

Relevant offers

Do you know a child named Aiden or Madeline? Chances are someone will as they are the top names in North America for boys and girls in 2009, while Jacob and Emma were the most popular of the decade.

"We've seen more spelling variations of both of this year's top names than we imagined possible - Aiden has also been Ayden, Aidyn, Aden, and Aaden and Madeline can be spelled Madeleine, Maddelin, and Madalen," said Candace Alper, the creator/executive producer of the musical web site nameyourtune.com.

"Parents like the sound of traditional names, but they also want to show the individuality of their children. Parents realise that the name they give their child will become part of the child's identity," Alper said.

New Zealanders will have to wait till next year to learn our most popular names - the Department of Internal Affairs releases names for children born in 2009 in first week of January next year.

However, last year, it was Jack that topped the New Zealand list for boys (for the fourth year in a row) while Sophie was the top choice for girls. There has been a tussle going on between four girls names for years - Emma, Ella, Charlotte and Sophie have all topped the list over the last five years.

Meanwhile, Alper said that variations on the name Aiden are also dominating both boys and girls names, such as Jayden, Brayden and Hayden, because the names are gender-neutral and can be spelled so many ways.

Her prediction for the next decade is that there will be more Edwards and a lot more Bellas being born due to the success of the Twilight film franchise.

Rounding out the top names for boys in 2009 were Matthew, Owen, Ethan, Jackson, Evan, Braden, Noah, Jack and Zachary.

For girls it was Madison, Emma, Hannah, Olivia, Audrey, Isabella, Grace, Taylor and Emily.

Top boy names of the decade were Jacob, Michael, Ethan, Christopher, Jack, Daniel, Aiden, William, Joshua and Ryder.

Top girl names of the decade were Emma, Madison, Emily, Hannah, Olivia, Samantha, Ashley. Ava, Elizabeth and Madelyn.

Ad Feedback

- Reuters

87 comments
Post a comment
noneofthese   #87   08:57 pm Dec 16 2009

@ Jennifer #40

"Emma, Ella, Charlotte, Sophie and Madeline? What are they going to do when they reach the age of ten and get too old for their name?"

lol. Thanks for the laugh. These names have been around for CENTURIES. They're classics. And all are of Germanic, French or Hebrew origin. There have been PLENTY of instances of Emma, Ella, Charlotte, Sophie and Madeline growing up old and wise, and being taken seriously. Charlotte Bronte, Ella Fitzgerald, Emma Thompson, Madeline Albright....to name four.

I think probably they'll be just fine at eleven and beyond....

And Ryder....comes from an old english surname...so similar to all the Campbell, Mitchell, Taylor, Bailey and Jackson's out there.

Emma   #86   02:30 pm Dec 16 2009

There's a peer in the UK called Lord Adonis. (of Camden Town, of all the dumps to be a lord of)

His ego must be truly vast.

Also, he so doesn't look like an Adonis!

Marcus   #85   02:25 pm Dec 16 2009

I hate biblical names. So trite. No one ever uses Jesus either. Or Herod.

And porno star spellings like Krystal, Ayden, Nikki etc are ghastly.

Nakeshia   #84   12:55 pm Dec 16 2009

I get called some interesting things when I tell people my name: Natasha, Latesha, Nakita, Nicky to name a few. And people cannot pronounce my name, it Na-kee-sha, fairly simple, it's only 4 syllables. I don't blame my parents for giving my an unusual name, they just couldn't agree on one. Mum wanted it to just be Keshia (Keisha is a more common spelling) and Dad wanted Nastassja (after the Russian actress Nastassja Kinsky). Normally I just introduce myself as Keshia as most my family call me that. In some ways unsual names are both a curse and a blessing. I wouldn't name my kids any of the names on the list, but I wouldn't give them a name like Moon-Unit or Montana either.

pam   #83   11:14 am Dec 16 2009

I wouldn't worry about mis-spelled names, so many of the opinions here have orful speling anyway, literacy is obviously not that important anymore it seems........

Andy_r_brown   #82   10:34 am Dec 16 2009

Those with the historic name Nike and Paris I feel sorry for. Paris was a man, and Nike was female.

Spartacus   #81   09:24 am Dec 16 2009

"aurora and drake and Lorelai"

ahhh :D

Diane with 1 n   #80   09:09 am Dec 16 2009

To all of you going on about the poor kids having to spell their names - well I have to spell out my name all the time and how simple is the name Diane or is that Dianne. How about Jane or Jaine. Nicer to have a different names than the same old boring names. Each to their own I say. I am sure there will be some that hate the name you chose.

Jeff Geof   #79   09:07 am Dec 16 2009

I have always like Arelan as boys name, and I'm with the correct spelling of Aidan. Spell the Gaelic names correctly if you are going to use them!

clare   #78   09:05 am Dec 16 2009

Interesting comments. Kids have always been named after royalty and stars, that's why there are so many older Margarets and Audreys. There has also been the trend of naming after the months, lots of older June's, Aprils and Mays. What's more unimaginative or weirder than that? Lots of Hayleys in the 80's last time the comet swung by. Most Catholic children are named after the saints. I have two normal christian names, Clare & Marie and have always had to spell them as there has always been two alternative normal variants in spelling. I now have to spell my surname (a bit more unusual) and my street name. I don't think a variant in a christian name is such a biggie. What about all the Thompson, Thomson, Tompson or Johnstone, Johnston out there. They also have to continually correct their names. The worst thing to do to a child is give them a name that will make mocked at school, or a name that when put with a surname makes a statement, eg Sandy Beach. One thing parents should really stop doing is giving them a christian name that can also be a surname when the surname is also a christian name eg Campbell James. Most confusing for the rest of us.


Show 28-77 of 87 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers
Opinion poll

Would you take your husband's surname?

Yes, I would take his name.

No, I would keep my own name.

No, he would take my name.

No, we would both change to a new name.

Vote Result

Related story: Should you take your groom's name?

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content

Omnivore blog pointer small

The Omnivore: Jeremy Taylor on food

How do you find food that you'll like?

Moata

Moata's Blog Idle

Oh, imperfect love

Greer wedding blog pointer small

Ready or Knot: Greer's getting married

Why Valentine's isn't a Hallmark holiday

Crazy Chic blog pointer small

Crazy Chic: Bronwyn Williams' fashion ride

Your fashion questions answered: Part 1

Car Club small pointer

The Car Club blog: Powered by Autocar NZ

Group riding: be aware of the road rules

Voyages blog pointer small

Blog: US/NZ - a cultural conversation

Tales from an American Valentine's Day

Drivetalk small pointer Feb2011

Drivetalk: Dave Moore's blog on cars and driving

Bikers and drivers - pull yourselves together

Horoscopes

What do the stars have in store for you today?

Sudoku

Rev up your mind with our numbers game

Crossword

Test your knowledge with our daily crossword

Send us your pet pics

Email yourpics@stuff.co.nz