The worst job in the world

Last updated 05:00 07/01/2010
Oil rig
Reuters
POOR PROSPECTS: Workers leave an oil rig in Brazil. Working as a roustabout has been nominated as the worst job of 2009.

Relevant offers

Being an actuary, calculating statistics to determine probability and risk, is the best job to have in 2010, while working on an oil rig as a roustabout is the worst.

An actuary earns about $US85,000 ($NZ120,500) a year and has few physical demands, little stress, a good work environment and a positive outlook for employment and income growth, said CareerCast.com, a job search site that analyzed 200 jobs in North America.

The second-best job is software engineer, followed by computer systems analyst, biologist and historian, said CareerCast.com, which rated jobs in terms of stress, working environment, physical demands, income and hiring outlook.

Being a roustabout was rated the worst, followed by lumberjack, ironworker, dairy farmer and welder, it said.

A roustabout is a dangerous job that typically pays about $US31,000 a year, with high unemployment and a negative outlook for growth, the study said.

Switching to many of the best jobs would mean returning to school, said Tony Lee, publisher of CareerCast.com's 2010 Jobs Rated Report. This is its 12th annual study.

The worst jobs are "fairly miserable," Lee said. They tend to require working outdoors regardless of the weather, have elements of physical danger and do not pay very well, he said.

"On top of that, the job opportunities are not very good so if you really want one of these jobs, you may even have difficulty finding one despite the fact that they're dangerous, in bad conditions and don't pay very well," he said.

Last year, actuary placed second and mathematician first, while lumberjack ranked as the worst job.

The following is a list of the 20 best jobs as well as the 20 worst jobs, with No. 1 on the second list being the worst, according to CareerCast.com, a job search site that analyzed 200 jobs in North America.

     Best Jobs in 2010:

     1. Actuary

     2. Software engineer

     3. Computer systems analyst

     4. Biologist

     5. Historian

     6. Mathematician

     7. Paralegal assistant

     8. Statistician

     9. Accountant

     10. Dental hygienist

     11. Philosopher

     12. Meteorologist

     13. Technical writer

     14. Bank officer

Ad Feedback

     15. Web developer

     16. Industrial engineer

     17. Financial planner

     18. Aerospace engineer

     19. Pharmacist

     20. Medical records technician

     Worst Jobs in 2010:

     1. Roustabout

     2. Lumberjack

     3. Ironworker

     4. Dairy farmer

     5 Welder

     6. Garbage collector

     7. Taxi driver

     8. Construction worker/laborer

     9. Meter reader

     10. Mail carrier

     11. Butcher

     12. Photojournalist

     13. Firefighter

     14. Sheet metal worker

     15. Emergency medical technician

     16. Stevedore

     17. Reporter (newspaper)

     18. Sailor

     19. Machinist

     20. Choreographer

* Do you agree with these lists? Post your comment below.

- Reuters

40 comments
Post a comment
MattyH   #40   11:43 am Jan 08 2010

DONALD McDONALDSON,

Where do you go to apply for a job like that? Does the interview panel include George Bush and the Devil?

How much does it pay? Are you paid an hourly rate or per pound of dead baby you take off the wall?

Leah   #39   10:18 pm Jan 07 2010

How is being a choreographer a bad job? You dance for a living!

Nick   #38   09:16 pm Jan 07 2010

#17 Raimy, Carlsberg is awesome

Keith   #37   06:17 pm Jan 07 2010

These are obviously opinions of unproductive paper shufflers who think people who work with there hands don't actually enjoy it?? come on !

Liv   #36   02:21 pm Jan 07 2010

Brilliant! I have the 13th best job and my husband has 10th worst (supporting the mail carriers). Should make for an interesting household!

Amorita Maharaj   #35   12:55 pm Jan 07 2010

It appears Bank Officers is still considered one of the best jobs globally. Thats great news considering the recent global financial crisis.

Bob   #34   12:10 pm Jan 07 2010

This is really amusing, and far more reflective of American culture than anything to do with best and worst jobs. Thanks for the good laugh. Omigoodness, working outside!!! How awful. Jeez, you might get a bit cold somedays. Sitting on your bum all day, fantastic, what a great job. A job with a risk? Terrible! Better avoid a risk at all costs, even if it means sitting on my arse and killing myself through lack of exercise - better to be killed through a life of sitting around than possibly killed because of a nasty, scary risk. How about a headline like 'Job analyst in one of the world's fattest nations decides that staying inside all day and avoiding 'risk' is something to aspire to'

Cara   #33   12:05 pm Jan 07 2010

Office jobs tend to pay better, provide better job security and are carried out indoor (safe from bad weather). But it is oh so boring! If money is what motivates you, then this is the way to go. Let's not forget that this is a North American study and their priorities in life might be slightly different. The rating is in terms of physical requirements, salary growth, hiring outlook, stress and working environment; office jobs are bound to 'win' based on these factors (except for stress maybe). Personal wellbeing and satisfaction and contribution to society as a whole are not taken into account here.

Matty   #32   11:58 am Jan 07 2010

I would happily take a more labour intensive, outdoors job if I could find one that paid within coo-ee of my current white collar job.

Karlos   #31   11:07 am Jan 07 2010

@ PC #20 - haha yeah I would put that right near the top of the list - although I guess the hiring outlook wouldn't be that great as not many people would leave that job once they had it!


Show 1-30 of 40 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers
Opinion poll

Would you take your husband's surname?

Yes, I would take his name.

No, I would keep my own name.

No, he would take my name.

No, we would both change to a new name.

Vote Result

Related story: Should you take your groom's name?

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content

Omnivore blog pointer small

The Omnivore: Jeremy Taylor on food

How do you find food that you'll like?

Moata

Moata's Blog Idle

Oh, imperfect love

Greer wedding blog pointer small

Ready or Knot: Greer's getting married

Why Valentine's isn't a Hallmark holiday

Crazy Chic blog pointer small

Crazy Chic: Bronwyn Williams' fashion ride

Your fashion questions answered: Part 1

Car Club small pointer

The Car Club blog: Powered by Autocar NZ

Group riding: be aware of the road rules

Voyages blog pointer small

Blog: US/NZ - a cultural conversation

Tales from an American Valentine's Day

Drivetalk small pointer Feb2011

Drivetalk: Dave Moore's blog on cars and driving

Bikers and drivers - pull yourselves together

Horoscopes

What do the stars have in store for you today?

Sudoku

Rev up your mind with our numbers game

Crossword

Test your knowledge with our daily crossword

Send us your pet pics

Email yourpics@stuff.co.nz