Lab-grown sausage six months away
Would you be keen to eat a lab-grown sausage?
Relevant offers
Food & Wine
Pig cells + horse fetal serum = synthetic sausage. That's the formula for growing meat in a petri dish.
And scientists said the world's first lab-grown sausage - or "pain-free meat" - could be just six months away.
Today, almost one billion people are undernourished, the World Bank said. In the Horn of Africa, more than 12 million people in five countries face starvation.
And as the world's population grows hits seven billion at the end of next month and 9.3 billion by 2050, according to United Nations' projections, the need for additional food sources will become more pressing.
So can synthetic food grown from cells in a laboratory help to tackle world hunger? Will eating what has been dubbed "meat without slaughter" help the environment, by putting less strain on it than traditional farming and food processing methods?
Mass producing meat in a lab
Growing meat in a lab is not new - with tissue engineering already used for medical purposes, but creating synthetic food on a large scale is still in its early stages.
Professor Mark Post of Maastricht University in the Netherlands, who is creating the sausages in his laboratory by feeding pig stem cells with horse fetal serum, hopes to take on cow cells next.
"I'm hopeful we can have a hamburger in a year," he told the New Scientist.
He acknowledges the muscle-like pig cell strips he has created - 2.5 centimetres long and 0.7 centimetres wide - by feeding pig stem cells with horse fetal serum, don't look very appetising.
"It's white because there's no blood in it, and very little myoglobin, the iron-bearing protein," he told the New Scientist.
"We are looking at ways to build up the myoglobin content to give it colour."
And he hasn't sampled them either, as strict rules prevent the scientists from eating tissue grown in a lab.
But he and his colleagues - who met at an "in-vitro meat" conference in Sweden last month - believe these synthetic foods would eventually meet the world's demand for more meat and also have a light environmental footprint.
"The [environmental] impacts are so much lower," said the University of Oxford's Hanna Tuomisto, who found in a study that these synthetic meats would need 99 per cent less land than beef farming.
Feeding mega-cities
Food security expert Julian Cribb thinks lab-grown food could give Australia a "great opportunity" to get into the bio-food market - especially since it's geographically near Asia's mega-cities.
"We are growing cities of 30 to 40 million - Jakarta, Shanghai - gigantic cities, with almost no internal food production capacity. Those cities are horribly vulnerable to shortages ... and [that's where] these new foods will come in."
Animal rights campaigners agree. PETA, the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, put up a $US1 million reward in 2008 for the first commercially viable synthetic meat before next year.
And Voiceless, an Australian animal protection group, said it would support a lab-meat industry if it meant the end of factory farming.
"If the development of in-vitro meat will enable [meat-eaters] to eat meat without causing any animal harm or suffering, it will be a giant leap forward for animal protection," said Dr Annemarie Jonson of Voiceless.
'Moves us further away from nature'
But for Monash University philosopher and ethicist Dr Robert Sparrow, growing petri-dish meat would be the "ultimate end-point of the process of denaturalising food".
"It removes people from any contact with food production ... and the safety of this technology for human consumption remains unproved - we will be essentially be conducting an experiment on ourselves."
Dr Sparrow, who is currently a visiting fellow at the University of Sydney, viewed the move to mass produce lab food as over complicating our food shortage problems.
He also questioned whether there would be demand for such meat.
"It entirely unlikely that this would replace the meat industry," Dr Sparrow said.
"If we are going to have food security and sustainable food practices, we need to be looking at much more local agriculture that is not based on industrial food models.
"This is a terribly convoluted way of doing something that we could do by moving to a vegetarian diet instead."
What do you think? Would you eat a burger grown in a petri dish?
- © Fairfax NZ News
Sponsored links
All for this, the sooner every farmer in the world in unemployed the better, think of all that land that could be reverted back to its natural state not to mention clean rivers.
Eventually, once this technology becomes indistinguishable from real meat, it will be illegal in pretty much all developed countries to grow animals to eat. Which will be a good thing, both ethically and environmentally. I for one cannot wait to eat meat that has not required anything to die for me to do so! #82, pretty sure you can get away with not eating meat forever as long as you have the right vegetarian diet. Aren't a significant portion of Indians etc vegetarian? I for one love my steak, chicken, bacon, etc, but I will be glad when no creatures will be dying to satisfy my taste buds.
whats so bad about fake sausages you scared? seriously these sausys will be safe you see they are made by science the same people who cured you of many many ailments only con is they will probably taste weird
Khaled #89 you are the reason for our obesity epidemic
I'm serious about my sausages, I normally eat 3 each meal, but I'm still hungry. So if these ones are cheap, I might just eat 6!
Eat real meat farmed and killed humanely or be vegetarian. Distribute wealth fairly, recycle, respect all land and all people, share, care and do what you came here to do, which is what makes you hum inside your heart. Why the heck is that such a far reaching goal for us as a world? I say, allow no one person, company, country, race, class or otherwise, the power to infiltrate others lives without the full informed consent of every individual.And I mean EVERY.
"Today, almost one billion people are undernourished, the World Bank said"
Well, I think the bank is the cause of that along with globalization! Theres plenty of food to go round actually. It is the big companies forcing governments and famers to grow their mass products that is causing fammin by causing monoculture and water shortages!
Get real and don't quote idiots who just tell lies to make more money:
Exposing The Truth posted this: “Bankers own the earth; take it away from them but leave them with the power to create credit; and, with a flick of a pen, they will create enough money to buy it back again... If you want to be slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, then let the bankers control money and control credit.” - Sir Josiah Stamp, Director, Bank of England, 1940.
@ yes way #3
Less health problems by eating meat???
Seriously, get a clue.
Id prefer my home kill sausages any day
Model ignores Victoria's Secret snub
The age of the Angry Young Man
Study looks at Kiwis' height, weight
Stuff's daily street style photo
Jonah Hill reveals diet struggle
In my beauty bag: Antonia Prebble
Gender non-conformity linked to abuse
Is the other woman always to blame?
Spiced apricots with caramel cream
Carterton tragedy: Safety chief would refuse balloon ride
Major courts overhaul proposed
Foreign Affairs Ministry confirms 305 jobs to go
Mob cancels star's performance
Kiwis not up with online security
Helena Bonham Carter 'honoured'
New hope for kiwifruit growers
Gender non-conformity linked to abuse
Nelsen cleared to lead NZ against Jamaica
Robinson starts for Chiefs against old team
Man's childhood comic collection fetches $4.2m
Newest First
Oldest First
Amazing that people seem to have no issue with fetal serum. When a cow is sent to the slaughterhouse pregnant the blood from the fetus is extracted and put in a centrafuge to separate the serum for use. This lab grown meat needs serum - so need to kill pregnant cows to extract it from the fetus - not such a nice thought now is it....