Crash reporting leaves much to be desired
I was quite miffed to note that after a particularly nasty crash last weekend north of Christchurch, in which a Mitsubishi Mirage crossed the centre line,
striking the right front quarter of an oncoming bus, it was headlined 'Bus crash kills three' by one Sunday paper, thus implying that the larger vehicle was responsible.
It's not the only mistake made by mainstream media when reporting crashes. They're often euphemismically labelled 'accidents' when no-one knows whether they are or not until the investigation is complete.
I've written this before, but I'm still reading or listening to stories which describe a car as losing control. Cars are never IN control - it's the driver who should be. Even when there's a flat or bald tyre, ice or rainwater, potentially causing a loss of grip, or alcohol or drugs impairing things, it results in the driver losing control of the car, not the other way around.
Then there's the use of 'four wheel drive' to describe utes or tall SUVs which may or may not be in four wheel drive at the time. I'm sure if a tiny 4WD Subaru Justy or Impreza was found stuffed into the side of another vehicle, it would not be reported as an all-wheel-drive, despite being one.
Why don't the media report them as trucks, cars and stationwagons. It might upset Range Rover owners and the like to have their vehicles described as 'trucks' but what else do you call something that's six-feet tall and weighs up to three tonnes?
Not only that, but even trucks as large as the huge Chevy Suburban can be purchased with rear-wheel-drive, so when an area bans four-wheel-drives, the 3000kg Suburban could have clear access, while the 750kg Justy would be denied it.
Two-wheel drive soft-roaders - there's a trend for them
Coincidentally, and proof that most people buy light trucks for their height, view and visibility rather than their off-road talent is the trend of offering entry-point versions of their family SUVs with two instead of all-wheel-drive. Most are thousands of dollars cheaper than the full rig and no less capable on the road - which is where they stay, anyway.
Even BMW's at it with its X1 sports activity vehicle, having a two-wheel-drive version which like the other brands offers lighter weight and a cheaper price for those whose idea of going off road is entering their own driveway.
So far, the BMW has been joined by Kia's Sorento, the Hyundai iX35, Mitsubishi's Oulander, the Renault Koleos, Nissan Quashqai, and Holden's Captiva. And now even Land Rover is to market a 2WD version of its LRX which is a sort of entry-point baby Range Rover.
» Follow NZStuffBlogs on Twitter and get fast updates on all Stuff's blogs.
Sponsored links
Along the same lines is when the report states that the road is dangerous. Used accordingly a road is not dangerous. And who is to say what the correct height for a car is. I like the higher driving position, as it is far easier to get in and out of a vehicle.
There was an article several weeks back titled "Bus hits pedestrian", whereas the description of the incident in the article made it clear that it was in fact the pedestrian who had walked into the bus.
A 1wd vehicle? You unicycle to work? Excellent - are you that guy who juggles in the square?
Seriously though, I didn't get the implication that the larger vehicle was responsible for hitting the smaller one from the headline. I did think the bus was the only vehicle involved.
Every motorcycle accident is reported as "motorcycle collides...." irrespective of whether or not that is factually true.
The media have the same issue when reporting level crossing accidents on the railway network. Its always "Train hits car" or "Truck damaged after being hit by a train". The trains can't aim for these vehicles. If the train hits a car 99.999999% of the time it will be the fault of the vehicle driver not the locomotive engineer. Bottom line is that if a crash occurs at a level crossing the vehcile driver had to have ignored warning signs or flashing lights or just not bothered looking to end up on the tracks as the train is going through.
You,re right Dave. Lazy journalism. Is there no qualification to be a journalist anymore?
I think that the general standard of journalism, and then the editing, has dropped considerably across the board.I am always amazed (although by now not surprised) at the amount of stories published with a sensational heading that turns out to be incorrect or misleading. I am even more stunned by the bloggers who fail to actually read the article before commenting on the headline alone.(And yes, I did read your article - I just think it goes further than cars and accidents)
Why is it that an incident in the USA can be swiftly reported to us with a clarity than is completely absent from any news reports from New Zealand?
Often, within an hour, we can be listening to a radio interview with an American Police spokesman explaining in some detail exactly what happened.
Here the journalists seem to be unable or unwilling to find out any facts at all, and we are forced to wait until any "official enquiries" are over - maybe more than a year later - before we know what went on.
If you are actually witness to something, it can be very disconcerting to read, watch or hear the ensuing news report. The reporter usually gets things so wrong that you wonder if they are describing the same thing you saw with your own eyes.
Last time I looked, my mountain bike was only one wheel drive. I don't have the energy to drive any more wheels than that. But I rarely ride a bike on the road, it's too dangerous.
As for losing control, it is rare that a driver can have no influence whatever on his vehicle's motion. Usually there are many options.
As soon as a vehicle is moving, the driver has lost some control. For example, there is a distance within which it is impossible to bring it to a halt, and the faster it is going, the longer that distance becomes. The degree of control is also varying constantly and widely with road conditions: corners, slope, water, ice, gravel, clay, etc, etc. The vehicle's tyres, brakes and suspension will suit some roads and not others.
"The car lost control"? Usually the truth is that the driver just plain ran out of skill. And the journalist just got lazy.
Me thinks this is a light story day. True, headlines are not accurate but that is so for most stories in papers and on the web. The headline is constructed to catch attention. What gets me is once you've got past the headline is when the story perpetuates the myth. Point taken about cars losing control, it is the driver who loses control of the vehicle. Roads are not unsafe when driven on appropriately, but some roads are safer by design than others...
Bikers and drivers - pull yourselves together
Downsize fuel bills - buy an SUV!
Stupid driving? Call the police, save a life
Clean, light diesels discouraged in NZ
Yaris - new car has more competition
Steven Joyce has too many portfolios
Coroner mistaken over cold-weather tyres
130kmh limit for NZ? Yeah, right
Toyota Hilux ads - which is best?
Un-signposted speed cameras: revenue first
Promised baby Jaguar here at last
Why not change ALL the road rules?
Parents don't want son's killer in town
Million-dollar view, shame about the house
'Naughty' toilet traps terrified toddler
Trap for burglars catches policeman
Brothel scares and stresses neighbourhood
Degrassi star died five years ago
Daily trivia quiz: February 18
Banking on return of blue magic
Bid to scrap race relations office
'Naughty' toilet traps terrified toddler
Wellington earthquake fear: No way in or out
High cost of living mars return to NZ
Cathedral repair bill intimidating
Which theme is worse: Bones or NCIS?
Newest First
Oldest First
We should be banning the 2wd vheicles too. More of us on 1wd vheicles means the roads will last longer and there will be far less congestion and pollution. And, by the way, my money is where my mouth is - I own one, and use it daily. ;-p