Baby bottles fail world standard - study

Aussie parents could be overfeeding their babies as more than half of all baby bottles sold have inaccurate measurements.

Aussie parents could be overfeeding their babies as more than half of all baby bottles sold have inaccurate measurements.

Parents could be overfeeding their babies because more than half of all baby bottles sold in Australia have inaccurate measurements, a study shows.

Experts fear that the lack of accurate measurement markings on the bottles could cause health problems for babies and put them at risk of becoming obese.

Researchers at Western Sydney University's School of Nursing and Midwifery bought and tested the entire range of baby bottles available for sale in Australia.

Of the 91 bottles, 57 per cent had inaccurate or missing volume markings, with 40 per cent missing at least one marking required to make up infant formula as per product instructions. One in five had at least one marking that was so inaccurate it failed international standards. This means parents could be making under-concentrated or over-concentrated formula.

'I fed a stranger's baby'
How I missed my babies' allergy
Baby facilities now law in US


"There's potentially some serious risks at the most extreme end," said Karleen Gribble, who led the research team.

"For most babies it's not likely to be life threatening but for a lot of babies it will cause problems like constipation, it will exacerbate reflux and it could actually contribute to overweight and obesity."

She said disposable plastic liner system bottles were "particularly alarming".

"Those bottles are manifestly dangerous for babies because some of them are 45 per cent inaccurate," Gribble said.

Ad Feedback

For example a parent could pour water up to the 100mL line but is actually only pouring in 55mL of water because the marking is inaccurate.

"That would result in really concentrated infant formula which in a young baby, a premature baby or a baby who'd been sick with diarrhoea, it could potentially be fatal," she said.

Most brands have at least one bottle with inaccurate markings and more expensive bottles were just as likely to be inaccurate as cheaper products, the report found.

Gribble said there is an urgent need to implement an enforceable Australian standard to avoid harming babies.

"Infant formula is actually a really tightly-regulated product, but if it can't be made up as instructed because parents are unable to accurately measure water then what's the point?" she said. "It's a failure of the system."

Their findings were published in the Journal of Maternal and Child Nutrition.


In 2013, Consumer Affairs carried out a similar study in New Zealand surveying volume indicator markings on bottles. It found the accuracy of volume markings on a number of feeding bottles sold in the country have inaccurate markings. 

Of the 35 bottles tested, 15 had volume indicator markings that were inaccurate by more than five percent. Some bottles over estimated the volume of fluid in the bottle by up to 40 percent.

This means that the 100mL mark on the bottle would actually be only 60mL in volume.

The inaccurate bottles tended to be low-cost, un-named brands purchased from discount shops.

Consumer Affairs said most bottles are imported and those that meet the European regulatory standard (the EN14350 standard) are accurate. These bottles tend to be more expensive. 

It advised parents with bottles that don't carry the standard have them checked at a pharmacy. Parents are able to take their baby bottles to a pharmacy which has accurate trade quality measuring equipment. If necessary, the correct measures of volume can then be marked on their bottles.

It is not mandatory for bottles sold in New Zealand to meet the EN14350 standard as The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment said that the issue falls outside of the scope of consumer law. 

For more information, see the Ministry of Health's questions and answers on inaccurate markings on baby bottles.

 - AAP


Ad Feedback
special offers
Ad Feedback