Objections lodged against boundary changes

MATHEW GROCOTT
Last updated 11:13 14/01/2014

Relevant offers

Four objections have been lodged against a plan to shift Shannon and Tokomaru from the Otaki Electorate into Rangitikei.

The Representation Commission's proposed changes to electorate boundaries for this year's election includes a move for voters in Shannon and Tokomaru.

This morning the commission released a summary of objections to its raft of boundary changes around the country.

In total there were 409 objections, including four related to the Otaki/Rangitikei change.

Two of those objections came from individuals, the other two came from the Horowhenua District Council and the Labour Party.

All four objections said Shannon had little in common with the area Rangitikei covers.

One of the largest North Island electorates Rangitikei includes Linton, Feilding, Marton, Taihape, Raetihi and Taumarunui within its borders.

The boundary change was proposed as the population in Rangitikei had shrunk and the electorate needed to pick up more people.

The Horowhenua District Council's objection says there was a shared community of interest between Shannon and Tokomaru and the rest of the Otaki electorate, which runs down through to the Kapiti Coast.

''The Horowhenua District Council believes Shannon and Tokomaru are best served by a single, committed parliamentary representative in one focused and manageable electorate,'' the submission says.

It goes on to say that the views of Shannon and Tokomaru ''hold weight'' in the Otaki electorate.

''In the geographically much larger Rangitikei area, demanding for any MP to get around, Shannon and Tokomaru could well be overlooked and disadvantaged, sitting as they do at the south end of a 260-kilometre long electorate.

''Counter objections can be placed with the Representation Commission until January 29 with final decisions to be released in April.

Ad Feedback

- Manawatu Standard

Comments

Special offers
Opinion poll

Do you have faith in police solving burglaries?

Yes - there's no faulting their commitment.

Mostly, but they are under-resourced.

Sort of - depends on when and where.

Not really - clearly a low priority for them.

Absolutely not.

Not sure - luckily I've never been burgled.

Vote Result

Related story: Burglaries figures down but fewer being solved

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content