Police chief urges bar curfew

Last updated 05:00 24/07/2009

Relevant offers

A top policeman wants people banned from entering bars after 1am, but his call has divided police bosses.

Christchurch area commander Inspector Derek Erasmus also wants bars closed by 3am as police struggle to grapple with "a heaving, throbbing mass of drunkenness" on weekends.

But Wellington's police bosses and the hospitality industry say it would be a disaster and would not deal with the drinking culture.

Mr Erasmus told a parliamentary select committee yesterday that his city already had a voluntary "one-way-door" policy that barred entry into some pubs after 1am, but it was failing as the recession hit.

"In essence the [policy] is toothless and unfair on many of the bar owners. I would like to see a one-way-door law that is binding on all licenced premises in the central city."

Mr Erasmus compared the convivial scene of people enjoying a drink on a summer's evening with the contrasting vision of the late-night beat cop.

"That beat cop will tell you about a heaving, throbbing mass of drunkenness. About vomit and urine regularly staining footpaths, shopfronts and shop doorways. About smashed glass, regular fights."

He said 85 per cent of those causing trouble in the city had been drinking at home first but were attracted by the social atmosphere.

Police arrested 1000 people in Christchurch last year and 49 last weekend for breaching the area's liquor ban. If doors were closed by 1am, people including those on the street would begin to leave the central city. There would be time to clean up the city before daylight.

Wellington area commander Inspector Pete Cowan said a single law change would not deal with weekend drinking problems or the drinking culture generally.

He said Wellington police had looked at a one-way-door policy a few years ago but realised it would not work unless all 247 licensed premises in the city centre signed up to it.

"I do not want all the businesses to close at the same time. Thousands of people put out on the street at once, that would be absolute chaos."

He was awaiting the outcome next year of Sir Geoffrey Palmer's report on drinking, which is looking at raising the age for buying alcohol from off-licences among other measures.

"The problem we have with alcohol is massive but there's no magic bullet," Mr Cowan said. "We need a combination of laws, with different processes and strategies to deal with it."

Hospitality Association of New Zealand chief executive Bruce Robertson said the moves could affect bars' income and unfairly punish them for all the young people drinking on the street.

Ad Feedback

An arbitrary closing would also impinge on patrons' rights. "What about people who want to watch a late-night rugby match that starts at 3am?"

TIME PLEASE

Dion Cooper, owner of Turks Bar, Havelock North: Against a 1am closed-door policy. Hawke's Bay bars already close at 3am. "I'm not big on being told, 'You can't let people in after 1am.' I pick and choose who comes into my bar already."

The real problem was young people drinking at home and coming to town. The age for buying at off-licences should be raised from 18.

Chris Ace, owner of Highflyers, Palmerston North: Already has a 2.30am closed-door policy. Palmerston North bars close at 3am. "It [the 1am policy] would damage business.

"These days we don't even fill up till midnight. The culture's changed, people are coming to town later and later."

Jason Deane, co-owner of Temperance, St Johns and El Horno bars, Wellington: A "knee-jerk reaction" that would punish bars and patrons because of a small minority.

"It's a joke to say you can't go out late at night. It's a backward step that internationally would make New Zealand look like this hick little country."

John Coleman, owner of Wellington's Hummingbird bar: Described a 1am closed-door policy as very "restrictive and outdated thinking" that would be impossible to police. There was too much onus on publicans and their staff who face up to $10,000 fines for serving a drunk person.

"It's pathetic. We're starting to learn not to drink and drive but who's telling people it's not cool to be drunk?"

- BRITTON BROUN/Dominion Post

81 comments
Post a comment
Rob   #81   11:18 am Jul 25 2009

Great idea! Push all the drunk people out on to the street where they can vandalise things! Shut up and do your job Mr Policeman.

to nic #70   #80   09:29 am Jul 25 2009

Their are many other ways to have a social life.....church is not one of my options but one is not a loser for going to church. We live in a beautiful country with many adventures to be had. Alcohol is just one option. And usually (losers) drink too much...because a loser would be defined as wasting precious time in such a short life on being intoxicated and more than offen hurting those around them from there drinking behaviour.And another point from you tiny post is this issue does affect everyone. Do you actually know how many people are in prison through theiur drinking behaviour, do you know how many parents are unable to spend time with their kids because of their need to drink, Do you understand that Alcohol is a drug than runs like acid through relationships and familys, destroying the innocent and converting future drinkers through the pain they cause... think more deeply about this issue, i am not saying i have any solutions but i am saying that if you want to call someone a loser you should look only in the mirror, as those who point the finger are usually the culprits...

geof   #79   11:38 pm Jul 24 2009

I am a shift worker, and often I don't finish work till 06:00. It would be nice if I could go and have a drink after work. I think that the onus should be on the publican, if there are really drunk people on site then they should have there license suspended. Also start to fine / jail people for being violent. Not everyone that drinks is a problem drinker, just like not everyone that drives; drives drunk; we don't punish all drivers for a few drunk drivers. The problem with society is that people don't take personal responsibility serious any longer. Stop pussy footing around and push the responsibility back onto the owners.

Andy   #78   07:34 pm Jul 24 2009

The price of alcohol in bars is far too expensive which is why people drink to excess at home before going out. If the government was to give relax its tax on alcohol making it more affordable to drink in bars consumers would go out earlier in the night rather than drinking at home to excess. In addition to this the government should also introduce a responsible service of alcohol (RSA) course like in New South Wales in Australia to educated bar staff. Encouraging people to drink out in a controlled, safe environment, where bar staff cut of people who are too drunk is the way forward. Drinkers who have had too much to drink generally do not return home to continue drinking. This can only happen tho if the police are serious about policing the bars and coming down hard on bar owners and staff who serve drunks. Bars should be allowed to stay open to what ever time they feel is right. Consumers will slowly filter out on the street in their own time, making taxis/buses services home easier to obtain rather than having the same people stranded on the street.

This is a win win solution, business for bar owners increases, consumers get better value for money, and there are less drunks on the street.

Matt   #77   06:51 pm Jul 24 2009

I would find it pretty ridiculous that as a working, largely responsible, tax-paying adult I was then told that i had to go home at 1 or even 3am every Saturday night. 99% of people that go out in the weekends go out for a good time and dont cause any undue problems. If one percent of voters cast joke votes in a general election is that to say we should more to a one party totalitarian government?

Raising the drinking age is also not the solution. For one thing how can a government say to someone, you are old enough to vote and thus dictate the future direction of our country, or go to war and potential be killed, but you arent allowed to have a drink. Ridiculous.

I do feel somewhat for the police, but on an average night out it would be unusual to see more that two or three scuffles, most of which tend to burn out of their own accord pretty quickly anyway. And besides, I have elements of my job I dont especially enjoy either.

What amuses me is that most of the naysayers and tut-tutters are never out at 4am on a Saturday night anyway. They just read media reports about a fight in the city or some comatose 14 year old kid getting taken home by police and think NZ is going to hell in a hand basket and demand that things change. Of course, anyone with an ounce of common sense knows raising the drinking age is not going to stop the either occurrence. And I suspect a sociologist would tell you that NZs binge drinking culture (which is made out to be frightful, but frankly in my travels I have to say is no worse than alot of places in the world, and certainly much better than the UK or US) actually comes from the days of six o'clock closing, so I dont think going back as it were is the answer at all.

Nic   #76   06:43 pm Jul 24 2009

They introduced a 3am lockout law in Melbourne last year which lasted three months and guess what ... it didnt fix a thing, yet cost the economy several hundred thousand dollars in lost revenue.

nic   #75   06:16 pm Jul 24 2009

For all the losers with no social life:

Please don't try and ruin everyone elses nights by getting involved with something that doesn't even affect you. I'm happy to be out until 6am on a sunday morning with the mother of all hangovers. It beats church, thats for sure

Argh   #74   05:16 pm Jul 24 2009

I wonder how many 19-year-olds would agree with raising the drinking age to 20? The drinking age is 18 - it is going to stay at that age. There is no point in even suggesting that it is raised.

Henstep   #73   05:15 pm Jul 24 2009

Putting in new rules doesn't fix anything. Until people's attitudes change then the problem won't go away. Sometimes I am in town until the early hours but I'm not drunk. Does this mean my right to go out and enjoy myself on the weekend is going to be taken away because some people don't know when to stop drinking?

New Zealanders need to learn responsible drinking. Simple as that. Knee jerk reactions to problems create more problems. I'm sure the past has shown us that much.

Emma   #72   04:59 pm Jul 24 2009

Phoebix #53 As many of the above posts have stated, one of the main problems we do have are with those who have been drinking before coming into town. Many patrons don't realise it is illegal for bars to allow intoxicated people to be on premise. I think a lot more publicity needs to put out there so that people are aware that this is the case. Too much responsibilty is put onto bartenders/managers/ and publicans; we serve alcohol in a controlled and responsible manner. Why doesn't the law start prosecuting those who are drunk? People need to start taking responsibility for their own actions. I don't agree with a blanket closing time. I manage a bar that closes at 7am and my main problems are with those who we don't allow on our premises and those who have been drinking in the streets or at home beforehand.


Show 22-71 of 81 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you sign in, you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers
Opinion poll

Should conservation land be opened to mining?

Yes - We have resources, let's use them

Yes - Within strict environmental criteria

No - Too damaging to NZ's green image

No - National parks are treasures

Vote Result

Related story: Outrage as Key signals national park mining

Featured Promotions