'Get foreign help to build next bridge'

BY ESTHER HARWARD
Last updated 05:00 18/10/2009
bridge
The proponents of a new harbour bridge for Auckland want a structure fit for rail traffic and pedestrians, rather than focusing solely on road traffic. Pictured is a conceptual diagram produced by the Anzac Centenary Bridge Group.

Relevant offers

An urban design expert says Auckland is "architecturally banal" and needs a dramatic new structure such as a new bridge across the harbour – but the city doesn't have the talent to do it without help from overseas.

Kiwi expatriate Davina Jackson, an architectural writer and a director of Sydney's multimedia Smart Light festival, said an international design competition should be held to pick a replacement for the Auckland Harbour Bridge.

Jackson – who supports a group of architects, engineers and politicians lobbying to build a new bridge instead of a tunnel under the Waitemata Harbour – said a spectacular new bridge could steal global New Year's Eve celebration TV coverage off Sydney.

But Jackson added that Auckland had a "copyist culture" among its urban designers and should look overseas for talent.

"Maybe you've got some genius in the wings there, but from what I've seen of New Zealand architecture there's nothing at the level of genius that it would be great to see Auckland have."

Genius didn't cost any more, she said.

She described the current 50-year-old bridge as "clunky".

"It looks very do-it-yourself, kind of `mock up an imitation of the Sydney one, eh?' It just doesn't cut it as an icon of the city in the 21st century."

Jackson said international TV cameras should rightfully be pointed at New Zealand on New Year's Eve – because Kiwis saw in the new year two hours earlier than Australians – but typically they filmed fireworks on Sydney's Harbour Bridge because there was no visual spectacle good enough here.

Transport Minister Stephen Joyce will announce by the end of the year what it will build as an extra harbour crossing. The current bridge is heavily congested and there have been concerns about the long-term safety of the "Nippon Clip-ons" – the outer two lanes on each side of the bridge. Transit New Zealand's preferred option is a tunnel, but there is growing support for a bridge.

A big challenge for bridge designers would be building it high enough for tall ships to pass underneath, while creating a low enough gradient for walking, cycling and rail.

A lobby group led by former Auckland City transport chairperson Richard Simpson, and supported by New Zealand Steel – the Anzac Centenary Bridge Group – will present its business case to the government in a fortnight.

Ad Feedback

Detractors say that speeding up completion of a new crossing – in time for 2015 Anzac centenary celebrations, as the group wants – will mean delaying other big transport projects.

       THE CASE FOR A BRIDGE

  • Construction cost $2-3 billion compared to $3.7–$4.1b for the proposed tunnel
  • Operating cost of 1/5 to 13 of a tunnel (based on ventilation, lighting, drainage and maintenance)
  • About 350,000m2 of land valued at around $1b in St Mary's Bay and Northcote Pt could be sold off after closure of bridge.
  • Travel time and distance savings worth about $60 million a year (based on a bridge being 1.2km shorter than a tunnel)
  • Estimated tourism benefits: $325 million a year (based on tourists staying an extra night)

Source: ANZAC Centenary Bridge Group

esther.harward@star-times.co.nz

- © Fairfax NZ News

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content

Omnivore blog pointer small

The Omnivore: Jeremy Taylor on food

Alex James - what are you playing at?

Moata

Moata's Blog Idle

A Sheep's Show

David Farrar blog pointer small

By the Numbers: David Farrar watches the polls

Mondayising Waitangi and Anzac Days