There's policy, John, but not as we know it
So National has some policy detail after all - it's just that we can't have it.
I'm grateful to the Herald's Colin James, who has revealed the existence of a document backing up some of National's industrial relations policy-ette, which runs to all of a page.
His column this week has prompted demands from the unions and from Trevor Mallard to come clean and release the rest of the details.
Unfortunately, it appears James didn't get it quite right - at least according to John Key's office, which has just told me that there is NO 34-page policy document on industrial relations. It is, in fact, a 14-page document that simply backgrounds previous changes in industrial law, according to Key's office.
I'm unsure whether this is supposed to make me feel better or not. Personally I would have been happier to know that National had done more work in this area, even if it wouldn't release it.
I'm wondering if the same goes for the absence of solid research and background work backing up National's one-and-a-half-page broadcasting policy, its two-pager on ACC, its one-page early childhood education policy, and its half-page outdoor recreation policy?
I saw Jonathan Coleman being interviewed by Dick Driver on Alt TV last night (pleased to see National's spokespeople are still allowed on regional television) and he did an admirable job of defending National's lack of detailed policy discussion.
But the fact remains that even National supporters are getting frustrated. David Farrar, surely one of National's in-crowd, writes on his blog that he would like to see the background papers released as well - not because he believes they have anything to hide, but rather to put to bed any suggestion that the party might have.
Frankly I couldn't see any other reason for not releasing the papers. The last one we got was the ill-fated health policy of Tony Ryall's, which failed to mention National's plans to scrap the automatic fee review on GP charges. Press conferences on policy releases stopped abruptly then too.
But surely National is confident enough in its own policy positions for them to be debated in public? I understand it wanting to hold on to its tax policy until the election. But smaller policies which have already been released should be accompanied by the background detail.
As Farrar himself says, 99 per cent of the public won't read it anyway. But the media will, and so will National's opponents. But at least National can't then be accused of hiding anything. Otherwise, the question that is begged is that there are things in those documents that National is worried might frighten the horses.
It must be frustrating for the spokespeople themselves, too. I hear Simon Power did an excellent job on his law and order policy, which ran to many pages and contained a lot of background detail and reading. It has never been published, so no one gets to see Power's work.
There has been rumours that these will all be published closer to the election. Presumably at a time when there is so much else happening that no one has the time to go and read them carefully.
Right now would be good, since it would give the press gallery something to do besides chasing Winston Peters around the building, which frankly I'm getting very tired of. There are hopes that he may provide further details today, but I've heard that so many times before I've given up much hope.
ACT leader Rodney Hide has now complained to the Serious Fraud Office, but this is simply a stunt, albeit a funny one. It seems to me the only hope of rekindling the issue now is if Speaker Margaret Wilson decides to send him to the privileges committee, but my money is still on her finding a reason not to do that.
By the way, I hear that the announcement that former campaign manager and Exclusive Brethren bagman Steven Joyce will get a list-only placing has gone down like a lump of lead with National's caucus. Half of them are grumpy because they don't like his methods and the other half because he's leap-frogged them into Parliament without having to do any work.
Apparently Murray McCully is worried that there will be alternative to the role of "Dark Prince'' of the National Party. And to rub salt into the wound, Joyce was there on Tuesday to brief them all on campaign strategy, since he remains the campaign chairman. And the head of Jasons Media. Wonder if he'll find any time to campaign himself or whether he'll just be leaving that to his colleagues.
Sponsored links
Perhaps Helen Clark should reflect on a couple of things if you say you are going to run an open and honest government then do it!
You can fool the people some of the time but you cant fool all of the people all of the time !!
This Labour led Government as stated by Professor Bill Hodge on talk back radio will have the legacy of being the most corrup tgoverment that New zEALAND hAS SEEN
It has to be said that National's secrecy stands in serious contrast to Labour's 7 card pledge of 1999. That was a serious attempt at openness & honesty, & Labour legislated its pledges too. Hey we're still heading for a change of government regardless, but National could show a little fearlessness.
PS Colin, I'm glad to see you're getting tired of chasing WP too.
There's only one reason why you would try to release policy with as little fanfare or detail as possible, which is what National is doing by sneaking these one page 'policies' and not holding press conferences on them. That reason is you think that if people are aware of your policies, they will be less likely to vote for you.
The basis of democracy is informed citizens, National sees that as a threat to winning power. Fortunately, we have the fourth estate to uphold the right of citizens to be fully informed... at least, I hope we do.
Or maybe Jennifer he is reflecting on another quote (I'm not sure think it was Abraham Lincoln?): The government that governs best governs least.
I'm off to batten down the hatches. Take care of yourselves everyone, including Colin, Stuff Admin. If there is anything worse than anyone disagreeing with me, it is having no one to disagree with me. (Not that ignoring me will make me go away!)
See you later.
While I very much want to see Labour out of government, the fact that most of National's policy releases to date have been "we'll keep this Labour policy" makes me doubt this will happen, regardless of who wins the election.
The comments to this blog so far miss the point - most people want a change of leadership. Voters are tired of Helen Clark's government. On the policy front people want what they've come to expect over the last few years in terms of living standards. The problem is that the NZ economy is heading down hill. The polls indicate that more people believe Key is the one that can deliver continuity in the bad times ahead. This is where Key is positioning himself.
People like Jum are unable to look at the situation objectively - infact the wildly partisan level of comment to this blog only adds the pathetic pettiness that puts so many people off politics.
Another Abraham Lincoln quote may shed some light:
"It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to open one's mouth and remove all doubt."
Nationals full policies will be revealed once Helen mans-up and calls the election date. Then the voters can decide. I doubt the Nats want a repeat of 2005 with Labour adopting many of Brashs postions before the election began. So, the real question is not where is National’s policy, its where is the election date Helen??? Nov 15th isn’t that far away……
All rise - On the House stands adjourned
Dumb and dumber: Axing Heather Roy
Carter commits political suicide
Green leader out of line with protest
Get Carter, but not because he's gay
Party's over for Labour's Hooray Henrys
Whinegate unlikely to sozzle the PM
English sprinkles the fairy dust
Family of 13 face threat of homelessness
Police uncover alleged date-rape drug lab
Father leaves stories to be remembered by
Airport to remove homes in noise zone
Target carpet cleaner in court
Comedian admits role in fake pilot stunt
Cyclists run foul of city's walkers
Officer quits after theft investigation
Passionate advocate keeps wheels rolling
Botanic Gardens tea kiosk closed
Bring on those consent applications
More buildings demolished in centre
No glaring omissions in the All Whites squad
Newest First
Oldest First
Perhaps Mr Key and his colleagues should reflect on something Alexander Hamilton said some years back, that if you stand for nothing you will fall for anything.