Fiji - should we stay or should we go?

Last updated 12:23 14/04/2009

Checked the latest deals to Fiji yet? There's bound to be some good ones. Every time the political situation in that unfortunate country flares up, travel agents knock down the price of a winter holiday and we snap them up, secure in the knowledge that political unrest rarely impacts on tourists, Fiji's lifeblood.

But should we? Are we supporting a military state by spending our holiday dollars in Fiji? Or are we actually helping the subjugated people of Fiji, who without international tourist dollars would surely starve? You can pick your argument to suit your purpose.

Our Government has the same problem. Sanctions are always a two-edged sword. Would restricting trade, aid, or sporting links with Fiji hurt the regime? Or just the general population? The general consensus is that most sanctions either don't work or hurt the wrong people.

That's why we don't have any trade bans currently - even with Zimbabwe, not that we trade much with that regime anyway. A ban on sporting contact is effectively in place with Zimbabwe, which has at least stopped cricket contact between our two nations in recent years.

Sporting contact with Fiji has been limited since Frank Bainimarama took over Fiji, but again this ban has been circumvented several times by the Rugby Sevens, which are controlled by the IRB. Twice now Fiji has travelled to New Zealand to play rugby because it is deemed an international event.

Most effective is probably the ban on people associated with the regime travelling to New Zealand, particularly in transit, and this has annoyed Bainimarama intensely. So much so that he's taken to chucking our journalists out of the country on sight.

Though why he took any exception to that nice Sia Aston from 3 News is beyond me - she's extremely fair and very polite. But anyway. There has to be some reconsideration of what is working in terms of our relationship with Fiji, and what is not.

Foreign Affairs Minister Murray McCully has been turning his mind to this, and told Radio New Zealand this morning that he was considering trade bans and even trying to stop Kiwis travelling to Fiji.

I'm not sure either is a good idea. And I hope on that latter point at least that he was not serious. Any attempt to curtail the freedoms of New Zealanders to go wherever they want must be strongly opposed. To prevent Kiwis from travelling abroad, even to distasteful regimes such as Fiji's, makes us little better than the dictatorship we are trying to punish.

The Government can advise against travel to certain countries, and does so frequently. But it cannot demand it. Besides, where would you draw the line? Forbid travel to countries who govern at the point of a gun, subjugate their citizens, throw them in jail without a proper trial and regularly censor the media?

Oooops, hang on, that would mean we'd have to stop John Key going to China, and he's already on his way. In fact, he has an audience this very day with President Hu Jintao. China executes more people a day than Fiji has done in its entire history but we have a free trade deal with China, and it's got nuclear weapons, so we have to be nice to it.

Key will be hoping this leg of his trip goes more smoothly than the last, after his rapid departure from the cancelled East Asia Summit in Thailand - another country, incidentally, with a chequered democratic record. It probably will, since Chinese protesters are not treated with the patience or courtesy the Thai military seemed to extend to those who disrupted the summit.

I'm sure Key will raise human rights issues with President Hu (well I hope he does) alongside trade and the San Lu milk powder fiasco. I also hope he gets on the blower and tells McCully to forget any suggestion of trying to curtail where we can travel to.

After all, it would be a little hypocritical, wouldn't it?

 

 

 

 

 

48 comments
Post a comment
eddie   #1   12:42 pm Apr 14 2009

I couldn't give 2 hoots about Fiji, cut it loose.....cut any $$$ aid (In fact I'd cut the $$ Aid NZ Govt hands out like lollies to a helluva lot of pacific countries...Tonga/Samoa etc etc)

What annoys me is the cost and hassle of trying to 'rescue' any NZ'rs that go to unstable countries. If they are going to go, they should be under no illusion that it things go belly up whilst they are their, they can find their own way out!

Jasper   #2   02:39 pm Apr 14 2009

<i>Or are we actually helping the subjugated people of Fiji, who without international tourist dollars would surely starve? You can pick your argument to suit your purpose.</I>

Err, you do realise Colin, that almost 85% of tourist dollars spent in Fiji head offshore thanks to the hotel cartel, none of which spend money within Fiji to improve the lot of the natives.

Contrast with Samoa where no international corporations are allowed to set up (by law) and as a result, all the accommodation is locally owned. Any tourists dollars into the resorts/fales go towards improving the socioeconomic lot of the Samoan peoples. Personally, I've no time for Fiji, never want to holiday there again as it's far too depressing, and would much prefer spending my money where the locals benefit which is not the case with the Fijian hotel workers on $2 an hour.

Mr Been   #3   03:09 pm Apr 14 2009

Meanwhile back in little old NZ we have a man who got less than 4% of election votes dictating that 1.4 million people are to be amalgamated into one city.

Campbell   #4   03:39 pm Apr 14 2009

I find it interesting that bloggers here would take the ultimate umbrage if any outside country attempted to interfere, in any way, with what we do in NZ. Whether that is the Rainbow Warrior or the (alleged) money-go-round funded from the US and Australia through the Closed Brethren.

Yet we condone - indeed applaud - when our politicians belabour (and more recently benational), the defacto government of Fiji.

We may believe that "democracy" is the best method of governance (though it is only a couple of centuries old even in our legal system), but it really bamboozles me as to why we have to force it on other countries.

Leave them alone - don't go there if you don't support their system - and rigorously apply that to all the other places you don't like. Let Fiji work out its own destiny - trade with them as that keeps many of their people employed (and, incidentally, many NZers employed too) and keep out of their politics.

If the regime becomes totally insupportable the people of Fiji will work it through.

Robert Miles   #5   03:47 pm Apr 14 2009

Well as David Lange discovered in l987 we lack the military and muscle to do anything about this island local military dictatorship which is racist and repressive. Fiji Indians are among the most beautiful people. As Lange discovered our military was determined to pull the plug on anything too provocative to these tinpot dictators and to stiffle any Australian effort to do anything. The Fijians military is a suburb example of a pointless native indigenous military which has inevitably gone the way of African regimes. We should see what it tells us about our own pointless military which could not even design offshore patrol vessels that would stay upright in the Southern Ocean while the little Sea Shepperd trawler has curtraled the Japanese whaling effort for the moment.

Alan Wilkinson   #6   04:15 pm Apr 14 2009

Agreed, a travel ban on NZers would be both stupid and wrong - even if it could be enforced which it couldn't.

Fiji's loss will again be Rarotonga's windfall. It's easy to use locally owned and operated services and facilities there - and it's a friendly place, uses NZ currency with no sign of army uniforms, trucks or barracks anywhere.

The best thing NZ can do is support all the decent people who want to escape from the Fiji nightmare. Leave the dicators and their supporters to stew in their own juices but don't force innocent people to stay and suffer consequences not of their making.

_08   #7   04:21 pm Apr 14 2009

With all respect to you Eddie n Jasper. Thanks for the enlightening. Even I a Fiji subject residing overseas and due a visit to my home country a week time. I'am now hesitate in going back due to unpredictable situation and I do not see why any foreigners would like to take their chances. Dangers is soo clear ahead only and fools will rush in so......DO NOT BE ONE

jennifer   #8   04:51 pm Apr 14 2009

Mr Been #3 Precisely. As an Auckland ratepayer, I'm somewhat annoyed that the Royal Commission report was hijacked by that punk Hide, and his right wing mates, including that horrible man Banks. The 'one city' idea is a good one - one city, one mayor, one plan, one rates bill - but the concentration of power in the centre and the denial of genuine democracy is an old fashioned gerrymander, plain and simple.

John Fouhy   #9   05:26 pm Apr 14 2009

Allegedly Commodore Bainimarama is ordering Fijian ISPs to shut down: http://rawfijinews.wordpress.com/2009/04/14/frank-orders-to-cut-off-all-internet-access/

If true, _that_ will hurt tourism..

Sheelagh   #10   05:41 pm Apr 14 2009

Campbell (4)

I can see your point but the situation is a bit different when the country concerned is receiving foreign aid.New Zealand donates quite a tidy sum to the Pacific nations so surely that should give us the right to interfere (as you put it) in that country's affairs.

Democracy seems to work in this country . Look at North Korea . Which would you prefer? I know which one suits me.


Show 11-48 of 48 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content