Lockwood rules the roost

Last updated 12:25 07/12/2009

Trans-Tasman's annual ranking of our pollies is out, and Speaker Lockwood Smith is a surprise bolter to the top of the pile.

The perenially cheerful Dr Smith has pipped even the Prime Minister, John Key, vaulting from 5 last year to 9.2, just above Key on 9 out of ten.

Trans-Tasman says Smith is the best Speaker in more than 50 years and has held the executive to account, creating "an overdue infusion of good sense and a real commitment to Parliament''. 

National will be fuming at Smith scoring top place, since they consider him to be far too smug already. I'm not sure I would have scored him ahead of Key, although certainly he'd win most improved. In hindsight, the appointment was inspired.

Key is described as "a political phenomenon, a truly remarkable PM who has proved effective leadership doesn't depend on decades of parliamentary experience''.

Hmmmm. That, too, is a little over the top in my opinion. It's a bit early in Key's tenure to describe him as either a phenomenon or truly remarkable. He may turn out to be, but one year in the top job is not long enough for that kind of praise.

I'd agree he deserves a higher ranking than any other politician this year, by virtue of his ability to brush off controversy, find commonsense ways around seemingly intractable problems, and his personal warmth, which has made it easy for him to build and maintain relationships.

But I still believe Key has yet to be truly tested as prime minister. All of the crises he dealt with this year were relatively minor by the standards of what Helen Clark had on her plate (even if some of them were of her own making). Neither has he yet fulfilled the promise he shows.

Bill English got 8 out of 10, which I reckon is also a little on the high side. Apart from a reasonable Budget, English let the Government down this year and lost some of his credibility over the housing allowance saga.

Of the other Cabinet ministers, Simon Power got 8.5 (no argument there), Tony Ryall 8, Nick Smith 7.5, and Judith Collins 7, all of which sound about right. Gerry Brownlee got 8, which might be a wee bit inflated.

The lowest-ranking Nats were Colin King ("may not have noticed National is in power") and Paul Quinn ("Thinks he's one of the guns. He isn't.'') both on 2 out of 10. Again, no arguments.

Labour leader Phil Goff's fallen from 7 last year to 5.5, which is a bit harsh in my view. Trans-Tasman says he hasn't under-performed, it's just that everyone likes Key so much. Granted he's made the odd slip, but I'm not sure what more he could have done this year. Opposition is tough, and Goff has struggled for air time. I'd have given him a 7.

Confusingly his deputy Annette King scored 6.5, which I think is strange given she's been pretty quiet and in my opinion has failed to get the better of Paula Bennett in Parliament, as had been expected.

None of the other Labour MPs have ranked very highly. David Parker got 6, while at the bottom end Ashraf Choudhary got 1, which I think was pretty generous actually.

Among the minor parties, ACT leader Rodney Hide got 4, down from 5.5, and fair enough, too. He ranked lower than his other MPs, with Roger Douglas and Heather Roy getting a 5, John Boscawen 4.5, and David Garrett a 4.

The Maori Party scored the only 0 in the survey, which went to Hone Harawira. Trans-Tasman notes "his appalling behaviour was a disgrace''. Maybe, but that shows up the perspective of its authors. To rank him below Colin King or Choudhary is silly. At least he works hard for his electorate, even if he is a firebrand blowhard.

Co-leaders Pita Sharples and Tariana Turia both got 7s, which they deserved.

The Greens, who celebrate their 10th anniversary in Parliament today, didn't have a great run, with top spot going to Jeanette Fitzsimons, who's retiring. Co-leaders Russel Norman and Metiria Turei both got 4s and most of the others 3s. It hasn't been a stellar year for the Greens.

Peter Dunne got a 4 and Jim Anderton a 3.

Overall Trans-Tasman has it about right, as usual, although I think it slightly favours the Government, particularly the ministers.

Follow NZStuffBlogs on Twitter and get fast updates on all Stuff's blogs.

 

 

42 comments
Post a comment
Peter S   #1   12:32 pm Dec 07 2009

"Gerry Brownlee got 8, which might be a wee bit inflated."

LOL. Like Gerry himself?

I do agree Lockwood deserves credit for his performance. It really is a pity that over the last few decades we have had to put up with Governments not having to answer questions. Really it should be the minimum we expect rather than cause for celebration.

Key's score is maybe a little like Obama's Nobel Peace prize- awarded for being nice and saying nice things rather than for any concrete action.

Ben   #2   12:34 pm Dec 07 2009

A nice balanced piece of writing, I enjoyed it Colin. I'd be interested to see what they ranked the politicans here in Australia.

Mr Been   #3   01:05 pm Dec 07 2009

Maybe Key scored lower because he was behind the 8 ball on Copenhagen. A follower rather than a leader.

Ken   #4   01:30 pm Dec 07 2009

Yes, National will be quite upset that they haven't had the same easy ride as the Labour Ministers did during question time. #3. 'A follower rather than a leader'. I doubt that Key was ranked with 9 points because he follows. A 9 would indicate that he was rated as a good leader.

RichardRight   #5   01:51 pm Dec 07 2009

goofy fill-in gapp's ratings are heading the same way as his popularity.....what a muppet the labour leader is.....

"Labour leader Phil Goff scored 5.5, down from 7..."

eddie   #6   01:51 pm Dec 07 2009

Hmmm Hone got a 0, wonder if that's racist, maori bashing? :)

Perhaps the 6 that ranked the MP's were 'White MOFS'

good to see Lockwood at the top, I have for years been appalled at the level of 'answers' that ministers and PM have given....good to see the parochrial one eyed speakers (Hunt, Wilson) have ,hopfully, from now on been thwarted and now the bar has been raised for any future speaker no matter which side of the political fence they come from.

sammy   #7   01:57 pm Dec 07 2009

In return, John Key has announced his rating for Trans-Tasman:

"I'm awarding them 7. No wait, it's 3. What's that, Bill? OK, definitely a 5. Or a 9. Rodney says 2? Well, 2 it is then. Or Rua, as my new best friend Tariana would say. Which means 8, I think. Look, everyone just pick their own number, and I'll be relaxed about it, OK?"

Matt   #8   02:01 pm Dec 07 2009

Next you know Key will be nominated for a Nobel prize.

Dave T   #9   02:06 pm Dec 07 2009

It helps Lockwood that the previous speaker was so ineffective and such an screeching joke. Would not of thought that Goff or King would of been so high in the rankings, nor the other Dr Smith. Is Anderton still alive? If breathing gets you a ranking of three Colin King, Quinn and Choudhary must be dead losses to their parties. As for the Greens not a surprise what so ever with their performance and leadership choices, don't see to much of a future for them as I forsee a bit of a backlash over their social policies and fanatical climate change stance. We will all be back in caves soon and without the assistance of horses or cattle (because they fart) shame that some listen to their hot air.

bobux   #10   02:22 pm Dec 07 2009

Colin

Spot on, Colin. Transtasman, for all its merits, tends to be pretty gentle in its treatment of the government of the day. This is particularly noticable in the early days of an administration - presumably while they butter up ministers to gain access. I don't think it is ideological - their coverage of Clark's first term was even more flattering than the current issue on Key. It's interesting to note which Ministers they are particularly kind to (e.g. McCully). Hard not to suspect they are the source of some 'helpful' insider gossip.

With reference to your previous post, I notice the Australian Liberals have done much better than predicted in two recent by-elections. Abbott may not quite scare the urban middle classes to the extent claimed.

The real message here may be for NZ Labour. In Turnball, the Libs had a leader that completely failed to gain traction with the public. And he failed at the core task of opposition - to oppose the government. It is clear that the Libs wanted to dump him, and would accept almost anyone as an alternative. Abbott was a gamble in many respects, but could at least be relied on to aggressively attack the government. If Goff and Labour's rating don't improve in the next six months, I wonder if they will also start to feel desperate?


Show 11-42 of 42 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content