TV3 poll gives Goff breathing space
Labour will be happy it got a lift in the TV3 poll last night, although the emotion is probably closer to relieved than pleased.
For had the result been anything else it would have represented a serious threat to Labour leader Phil Goff's leadership.
Rightly or wrongly the poll result was seen as a referendum on Goff's nationhood speech. Given the size of the risk Goff took, a flatline or, even worse, a poll drop would have called into question his political judgment.
There are still those who think it was the wrong call, of course. The theory goes that speeches on race relations are like fizzy drinks - good for a quick sugar high, but short-lasting. They question why Goff would bother firing off such a speech in the hope of a poll bounce just before the long summer recess, when opposition parties tend to disappear from the public's radar in any case.
I don't agree with that. I think a poll bounce right at the end of the year is an important psychological motivation for Labour after what has been a very tough year. Granted it's only a few points, but what interests me more is the trend in the personal popularity rankings.
Prime Minister John Key's approval ratings are down 10 points in the poll, while his personal popularity is down seven points. Most of the falloff for Key is among those who think he's doing "very well'' as opposed to those who think he's doing "fairly well'', which hasn't changed.
Goff is up three points as preferred PM and finally overtakes Helen Clark. He's down two in the performance stakes, but a higher number think he's doing neither well nor poorly.
So it's not so much that Goff is performing any better, but that a little of the gloss has gone off Key. That makes me wonder whether Goff's nationhood speech made much difference one way or the other. It certainly didn't turn voters off.
What may concern National more is if the PM is losing his golden touch. It's far too early to say, but then politics is a long game.
I've had a look at TV3's raw numbers for its individual questions, and there are just the glimmerings of dissatisfaction with Key. Those who think he's "more style than substance'' are up slightly, those who think he'd be "good in a crisis'' down a bit, those who think he's "inflexible'' or "narrow minded'' are both up a little, those who think he has "sound judgment'' down a tad.
For Goff, he's unchanged in most of these, but slightly fewer people think he's inflexible and slightly more think he has sound judgment. And interestingly, while Key beats Goff hands-down in a straight comparison, the one where Goff is well ahead is the style-over-substance one.
That's important, because it suggests the public do see Goff as honest and straightforward, and it could be something Labour uses to its advantage in the runup to the next election.
There's been the odd muttering from within Labour about Goff's performance as leader but personally I think he's safe at least until the next election. I think Labour should quit talking about it even privately and just get on with it.
Overall Key and National remain miles ahead, and you'd have to be pleased if you were Key that the Government ends the year in no worse a position than it started it, particularly after the recession.
It's just as likely Key's popularity is returning to reality after unrealistically high levels this year. Either way it gives the PM something to ponder on the plane to Copenhagen tomorrow.
Follow NZStuffBlogs on Twitter and get fast updates on all Stuff's blogs.
Sponsored links
Unfortunately for the 'eddies' et al the Key lot are on the way down. As you say Colin Goff can take heart, the people of NZ will eventually gravitate towards the 'honest and straight forward'. The demographic make up of the broad electorate will also favour Goff. It will be very interesting this time next year as the lights really start to dim on the Key sideshow.
Dear John Here's something to ponder on the plane while eating danish pastry. I voted for you because you pitched yourself as a person who could implement a big vision. You certainly aren't a career politician like most your colleagues or opponents, so there can be no other reason for wanting to be PM. It turns out you haven't really got a vision for us. So far, it's all small town stuff. Village politics. Huntly scout Hall. Your strategy is to try and make everybody happy. That's weak! If you carry on like this, your legacy will be, well none! Just like your predecessor. She's famous for her airbrushed photos, that's it. You'll be famous for that well-rehearshed smile. But did either of you fix the tax system? Nope. Is there a fantastic waterfront stadium? Nope. Did you create One New Zealand by getting rid of all race-based seats? Nope. Did you stick the finger at the phoney climate science until there's some concrete proof? Nope. Is life cheaper or much better than before in NZ? Nope. When you return from the Big Air Con Show, look down on NZ and have a good think about what you could set out to achieve that we can all look back on one day. Maybe a Govt that only employs 5 percent of NZ, not 95. That sort of thing. Happy landings.
As you say - breathing space. The right wing race card worked wonders, you may not think so, but obviously "joe public" does.
It will be pleasing for Labour that they have not self destructed, as they could have done, since the election, and are polling a steady 30% mark or thereabouts - so it is a healthy base to work from. National will be pleased as well, but they have to be careful not to get too arrogant and take the continued high poll ratings for granted which is what they could be inclined to do ; as an example, the Minister of Education's threat to mass sack Boards of Trustees (who are voted in by members of that schools community) because they express some disquiet over the national standards test - taking high poll ratings and approval rates for granted is a dangerous step for any government (the previous Labour led government is a good example)
With the score at 47-nil to the All Blacks, against the run of play the opposing captain manages a quick drop goal.
"The All Blacks better watch out", cry the few opposition fans in the crowd. "We're on our way now. Only nine converted tries and we'll be in front.."
I thought Garners poll on Goff's speech was ridiculous. They asked 1000 random people what they thought his speech given to Grey Power. I'd like to ask him how many of the people queried were actually in attendance to hear the speech, most likely 0, and how many people saw more than the 4 second clip screened on 3 News entirely out of context? How can you form a valid opinion on that? You can't. It's scary how much control the media has over peoples political opinions.
As Colin says, politics is a long game, but Two-Term John doesn't have to concern himself with that. Kiwikraut #3 "Concrete proof" would definitely be phoney science; all science is ever going to offer you are varying degrees of certainty. To put it another way: your phoney condition is a fraud. The long term problem for National is that its policies, where they differ from Labour's, are either junk (their education policy, for example, is little more than a mediocre deputy mayoral hunch) or deeply unpopular (we've had enough of you selling our assets to your clients).
The TV3 poll now backs other polls and bring them all pretty much into alignment, their previous poll just looked too good for Key and the Nats. Bit like climate change data, adjust the base line-make the swing look large-generate a headline-job done. Goffs playing of the race card may give him a boost from one section of NZ but will toast another section. It was a very strange thing for him to do and not sure who was advising him but a "Nationhood" speech to the audience he chose just smacked of personal desperation at the expense of the country. Always thought Goff had a bit more principle about him.
Kat #2 Get off your knees and stop praying for a miracle, it's getting embarrasing for everyone watching....I too can cherry pick snapshots of Colins blog.."Overall Key and National remain miles ahead, and you'd have to be pleased if you were Key that the Government ends the year in no worse a position than it started it, particularly after the recession" Kinda sums it up really Kat...still 'Roll on 2011" is it Kat?, wonder if you mumble that in your sleep?...or are people still laughing at you believing Goff will be PM in 2011?
All rise - On the House stands adjourned
Dumb and dumber: Axing Heather Roy
Carter commits political suicide
Green leader out of line with protest
Get Carter, but not because he's gay
Party's over for Labour's Hooray Henrys
Whinegate unlikely to sozzle the PM
English sprinkles the fairy dust
Guptill blasts Black Caps to victory in first T20
Quake felt across lower North Island
Hurricanes weather elements to beat Chiefs
One dead after Northland crash
New York apartment sells for NZ$105m
Police car pig painter mystery unsolved
Flights disrupted as severe thunderstorms hit Auckland
Fatal speed-gliding crash near Wanaka
Newest First
Oldest First
Flawed analysis as usual, Colin. Mind, you guys shape public opinion so I guess you and your unelected comrades will decide what the public do next year. It's kind of corrupt, really. But that's the way it is. Have a lovely, long, relaxing break after a year of tory propaganising, and come back refreshed for another year of the same. No 'block of cheese' budget in 2010, I bet.