A Key speech for National
Let's play a little game shall we? Let's try to guess what's going to be in Prime Minister John Key's speech at the opening of Parliament tomorrow.
I admit I'm a bit late off the mark with this. Labour leader Phil Goff has already started, releasing a speech to the Sunday Star-Times that he claims he will deliver tomorrow. In it, he puts himself in the shoes of the PM and says what he would do.
It's a ballsy idea, fraught with risk. If he doesn't deliver it with precisely the right tone - i.e. ironic - he's going to come across as a bit of an egg, frankly. Goff isn't the PM, and people might be either confused or annoyed at his pretence.
Also I think his prescription is unlikely to be offered up by Key tomorrow. The PM ain't going to scrap national standards, raise the minimum wage, change benefit abatement rates, introduce retraining allowances, or change monetary policy.
So what will he do? What should he do? We all know what the problem is, and most people seem to agree on it: low productivity, poor wages, slow economic growth, only average standard of living, growing gap with Australia, boom and bust housing market, poor savings record, high overseas debt and exchange rate.
"Fixing'' the problem is where opinion diverges. Labour reckons that pumping up wages through a boost in the minimum wage and more interventionist government is the right approach. National has gone the interventionist route over the past year, but is now leaning towards returning to a more individualistic, market approach.
So as Key puts the finishing touches to tomorrow's speech, there's no shortage of advice for him. The Tax Working Group reckons he should raise GST to 15 per cent, close property tax loopholes, introduce a land tax, and cut the top tax rate.
Don Brash's 2025 taskforce thinks he should do all of those things but also slash social spending as well.
Reserve Bank governor Alan Bollard has also chimed in, reminding Key that the middle class in New Zealand pays most of the tax, and that's "unusual'' among OECD countries. He also wants fewer tax incentives in the property area, since it makes it more difficult for the Reserve Bank to control inflation without pumping up interest rates to the extent that they push up the exchange rate.
I understand some of Key's Cabinet were less keen, particular around raising GST and socking their property developer mates. The problem, though, is that to make everything largely fiscally neutral there are just going to have to be winners and losers.
Key's been doing the Dance of the Seven Veils over his intentions, and of course it's always possible we'll be none the wiser tomorrow anyway. But given the number of hints he's dropped now that tomorrow's speech is going to be substantive rather than big picture, he risks failing to meet expectations if there isn't at least a little sizzle with the sausage.
On radio this morning, Key said:
''[The public] will be able to see where we are going, what we are doing. We will tackle some of the bigger issues like tax. You can expect in there to see our response to the Tax Working Group to give New Zealanders an indication of where we may or may not go. We will be reasonably specific. I don't think you will come away from the speech wondering what we are saying.''
He added that the tax system had been favouring those with rental property:
''There are hundreds of hundreds of thousands of Kiwis then who are paying for you to drive on the roads, for you to access the health system, for you to have superannuation in your retirement, for you to educate your kids. That's not fair and a lot of those people are low- to middle-income New Zealanders so I am just trying to put a bit of balance in the economy.''
So I think we can safely assume that property investors are not going to be the winners from tomorrow's speech. How Key plans to address this area is the issue. He could introduce a capital gains tax, or a land tax, or tinker with the rules around loss-making properties that allow investors to lower their taxable income.
Personally I reckon Key will go for a mix that doesn't allow Labour to claim National is introducing a new "tax'' - in other words, toughening existing regulations and closing loopholes.
On tax, it's now pretty clear National wants to move ahead with cuts to the top tax rate. The only question is when, and by how much. My money's on a reduction beginning in election year, probably a couple of cents, lowering to 33c over time.
That leaves two problems: how to pay for it, and what to offer lower-income earners so they are not left out. The property tax changes will probably cover the top tax rate cut, but not deeper and more expensive cuts further down the income scale. That would probably require a rise in GST.
GST is the biggest unknown. Key and Bill English are known to be tempted by the idea of raising it. It's simple, reasonably easy to do and would pull in a substantial amount of money for the Crown - roughly $700 million for every percentage point rise.
BUT - and it's a big BUT - there are problems as well. First, National would have to compensate lower-income earners and beneficiaries and pensioners for any GST hike, which would be administratively complex and would remove much of the increase in tax revenue.
Then there's the political ramifications. It's difficult to see how the Maori Party could vote for a rise in GST, no matter how much compensation was offered. That's a problem, since their supply and confidence agreement binds them to vote with the Government on all budget measures.
Second, Labour would have a field day. It's not going too far to say Phil Goff will be saying his prayers before he brushes his teeth tonight: "Please John, announce a GST rise. Make my day.''
Yes, I know, Labour introduced GST and then raised it, and got away with it too. But times have changed. Labour also slashed taxes and offered massive compensation when it introduced GST. And the economy wasn't in recession at the time either.
I think it would be a huge call for National, the party of lower tax, to raise GST, no matter how much economic sense it makes. The amount of money it would raise would be outweighed, in my opinion, by the public backlash.
Still, Key has promised a "step change'' in the economy this year, and raising GST is certainly that. There are other bold moves he could make, however, without throwing Labour such a bone to happily chew on.
Whatever he announces, tomorrow's a big day for Key. It's probably the most important speech he's yet made in his time in Parliament. With the economy swinging out of recession, now's the time for him to come good on his promise to raise the country's living standards - or at least outline how he plans to do it.
Platitudes about cutting red tape, rolling out broadband and tinkering with the RMA will no longer be enough, and Key knows this.
» Follow NZStuffBlogs on Twitter and get fast updates on all Stuff's blogs.
» Fancy yourself as a blogger? Whoever wins Blog Idol 2 will blog on contract at Stuff as well as win a new Nokia phone. Put on your blogging hat and enter!
Sponsored links
What a pretentious bunch of twees that blog here-most of the debate is uninformed (follow the lead blogger?)-c'mon Colin you take most of your oxymornic speculation to say in the penultimate paragraph-"Whatever he announces,tomoorow's a key day for Big" (oops I am a dyslexic globber)
"The Tax Working Group reckons he should raise GST to 15 per cent, close property tax loopholes, introduce a land tax, and cut the top tax rate.
Don Brash's 2025 taskforce thinks he should do all of those things but also slash social spending as well."
Colin, that is completely and bizarrely untrue. These are the Brash task force tax recommendations:
"Average tax rates should be substantially reduced, as ambitious expenditure restraint permits. Cutting core Crown expenses to 29 percent of GDP would, for example, allow the maximum personal tax rate, and the company and trust tax rates, all to be reduced to 20 percent.
Serious reforms should be undertaken to reduce the high effective marginal tax rates facing many middle income taxpayers with dependent children as a result of the abatement provisions of the Working for Families tax credit scheme.
Reductions in average tax rates should be achieved by reducing income taxes, and doing so having regard both to the importance of administrative simplicity and minimisation of tax avoidance on the one hand, and to the evidence that taxes on capital income can be particularly detrimental to economic performance on the other."
My guess is he'll tell us not to panic, to relax, to take a chill pill, just go with the flow man, nothing to see here move along move along. Perhaps I'm wrong. Maybe he'll bring some of his working experience into play and start spouting delusions from economic fairyland. Will this be the speech that validates his "two terms max" promise? One thing's for sure: he can't raise GST and then claim to have cut taxes.
Goff yawn, Key yawn - life goes on no matter what either says and nothing in either speech will do anything to address any problem.
Don Brash had the answers ...
The unemployed should queue daily at the Post Office for an allocation of work,
and solo mothers should have to consider their children being adopted by someone rather than receiving increased DPB.
Wish List - Speed up the mining stocktake, allow more aquaculture, abolish the families commission-ministry of womens affairs etc the liars at NIWA too), raise GST and introduce a tax free income threshold, re set WFF, re-introduce interest on student loans, abandon the daft ETS, apply the super city model nationwide to rid us of regional councils, open up ACC to competition, float the SOE power companies, fire Diplock for total failure. Chances of any of that happening is none but ordinary kiwis who have a rental property will be kicked in the head.
I'm sure the government's pollsters will have been working overtime, focus grouping every word. As a result, the platitudes will win the day, and we'll be none the wiser.
Ordinary New Zealanders – No need to guess. I have a copy of Emperor’s speech. My spies have got hold off a copy from the photocopy machine.
According to this, Emperor will say nothing concrete. I suggest we play a bulls**t bingo and count words like “Productivity”, “Growth”, “GDP Increase”, “Top half of OECD” etc. Unfortunately, I have to agree with Matt on this, though he doesn’t make any sense most of the time.
Tomorrow Mr Key will announce that there will be large scale mining for minerals to start earning real money for this country and pay for our past sins, there will be two nuclear power stations built - one outside Mike and Matt's place, MMP will be replaced with something less idiotic, and the term of govt will be extended to 5 years so that Labour won't get the chance to stuff everything up for a good long while.
All rise - On the House stands adjourned
Dumb and dumber: Axing Heather Roy
Carter commits political suicide
Green leader out of line with protest
Get Carter, but not because he's gay
Party's over for Labour's Hooray Henrys
Whinegate unlikely to sozzle the PM
English sprinkles the fairy dust
All Blacks stars of the show at Halberg Awards
Radio station's divorce promo 'cowardly'
Child killed at Motueka school
Small 3.9 earthquake wobbles Wellington
Waka capsizes in Wellington Harbour
Another ocean giant meets a tragic end
ACC beneficiary admits he cheated
Son smashes dad's loaned classic car into sea
All Blacks stars of the show at Halberg Awards
Beer fest to donate to charity
Wino's is all a matter of good taste
Supermarket, meat, salmon & children
Sir Bob Jones: SBW-Tillman fight a joke
Newest First
Oldest First
Mr Key.
Aren't you listening to Mr Goff? He seems to know all the answers.Pity he is in opposition.
What about a bit more of user pays?
How about doing what Bill Clinton,the Democrat President did and limit the DPB to the children already born? Tell these Mothers that they can go to the family planning or their doctor and get contraception free.I am sick of my taxes going to these women. I would rather it go to the child at school who is struggling with his/her reading and writing.
Come on , Mr Key. Bill got away with it.
You might even try and get some of these fathers to pay for their moments of pleasure.