GST and the Clinton defence

Last updated 08:21 11/02/2010

"Read my lips - no new taxes''.

Many a politician has been caught with words on taxes that have come back to haunt them, and like George Bush, John Key and Bill English can now add themselves to that list.

Yesterday's rather embarrassing revelations that both Key and English pledged in 2008 not to increase GST under a National government came at a bad time, just as the Government was gearing up its sales job.

Early indications are the public is prepared to at least listen to Key's proposal to raise GST from 12.5 percent to 15 percent, in return for an across-the-board cut in personal income taxes and additional help for beneficiaries and superannuitants.

Ministers privately admit that a bit of a sales job is required, however, and they've been told to get out amongst their electorates and do just that. 

But it doesn't help when both your prime minister and finance minister are found out promising not to increase GST not much more than a year ago.

What makes it much worse, however, is the way Key has handled it.

What Key should have said was that times have changed, that that was then and this is now, that a group of eminent tax specialists had recommended raising GST and the Government was open to new ideas to give the economy a boost.

Instead, he tried to argue his way out of what was a pretty cast-iron pledge, by claiming that he was only talking about not raising GST in order to fill in the rather large hole in the Crown accounts.

That's disingenuous. You either raise GST or you don't. The impact is the same, whatever the reason. Saying you won't increase GST to fund a deficit - but you will for tax cuts - is a bit like promising not to borrow for tax cuts but only for infrastructure.

National rightly got exasperated with Labour's claim when in opposition that National was planning to borrow to fund its tax cuts plan. It correctly pointed out that all governments have a borrowing programme, and at the end of the day there's only one pot of money and a whole lot of demands on it.

It's your overall rate of borrowing and its ratio to your overall GDP, plus your ability to debt service that matters - not what you're borrowing for. Particularly when, as a government, you can shift money around at will.

Ditto GST. How the Government structures its finances is up to National. A rise in GST is a rise in GST is a rise in GST. The rest is merely a money merry-go-round.

By claiming that he's stuck to his word on GST, Key comes across as mealy-mouthed. He makes himself sound like a typical politician, prepared to dance on the head of a pin and resort to semantics to get himself off the hook.

It also raises the question of whether Key can be trusted to tell the public the truth, if he's prepared to give such a qualified answer to a relatively open question.

If Key's explanation is to be believed, then he should have said: "No, I'm not planning to raise GST to fund the deficit, but if you're asking whether I'd raise it for other reasons, like tax cuts, then sure, I'll think about it.''

For the record, I don't think Key's intention at the time was to mislead the public. I think he really didn't have any plans to raise GST. But things change, and sometimes it's just better to admit that you might have been wrong rather than attempt some sort of Clintonesque technical defence.

Key could have taken a leaf out of his deputy's book. Bill English also promised not to raise GST, but simply told Parliament yesterday that the Labour Party had done such a rubbish job of managing the economy that National didn't have much choice.

Much better, with the added advantage of chucking the issue back at the Opposition.

In the long run, Key's blunder is not likely to make much difference to whether or not the public accepts the GST rise. That's all going to depend on the compensation package the Government delivers in this year's Budget.

But it was still a bad look.

» Follow NZStuffBlogs on Twitter and get fast updates on all Stuff's blogs.

» Fancy yourself as a blogger? Whoever wins Blog Idol 2 will blog on contract at Stuff as well as win a new Nokia phone. Put on your blogging hat and enter!

210 comments
Post a comment
RichardRight   #1   08:36 am Feb 11 2010

I seem to recall seeing footage of dear leader saying before the 2005 election that she believed "it was the parents right to disipline their own children and she would not cupport a ban on smacking".....

In Keys case there is the context of the quaestion to consider which of course the typical lefties will not understand because it is beyond there IQ to be able to do so....

michael   #2   08:42 am Feb 11 2010

Hmm colin, who really cares about something he said 2 years ago? Maybe this says alot about what labour is doing with their time in the other part of the political house! I am sure those labour supporters will be jumping up and down about how he lied or misled, but weren't they use to that from helen and co ie:painting, acc, speeding to the rugby match? How about everyone wait and see what exactely is coming in the budget before everyone speculates on what is spent on what or take from where eh?

Sheelagh   #3   08:44 am Feb 11 2010

Mr Key .

You are human like the rest of us .

Mr Goff has done his mea culpa. He has done one on your behalf.(Got it completely wrong) Robin Brooke has done his. Even the great Democrat President Clinton has done his.

Hell will have frozen over before Helen Clark would admit she has ever been wrong.

Before the baying wolves tear you to shreds I would suggest you admit you have erred and get on with the great job you have been doing.

Tall poppy syndrome is alive and well in this country.

Kiwikraut   #4   09:13 am Feb 11 2010

Can someone help me and list Labour's best 5 or 10 recent flip flops. Just want to check if John Key is special or if he's in good company. Mike, Matt, Murray, Kat, Jennifer...you must have a few Labour flip flops for us?

exhoon   #5   09:20 am Feb 11 2010

I care what he said regarding GST a couple of years back. I'm retiring early soon heading to a fixed income years before I hit 65. I'll be off a high income. Thought I'd give someone else a chance in the work force. Now this guy wants more of my income via GST. This guy and his right wing mates are in it for themselves not for the majority!

Sam   #6   09:28 am Feb 11 2010

Helen Clark also broke promises, and she probably wouldn't admit it.

But the real issue here is that the Prime Minister has been inconsistent to their word. Just because a predecessor has done the same thing does not make it ok.

If the public simply excuses this by thinking "but the alternative would have done the same thing" then we end up accepting that it's ok for our PM (whichever party they're from) to make promises they may not be able to keep.

Matt   #7   09:37 am Feb 11 2010

It's quite funny watching you Tories coming up with all your excuses for two-term John. You're even reduced to comparing him to Helen Clark, who according to you is comparable to Stalin. I can just see the slogan now "John Key - not as bad as Stalin". What's even funnier is watching two-term John twist and writhe and spin when telling the truth would have been so much easier. I think 50% of National party MP's are below average, 30% of them need to lift their game, and so does two-term John or he'll become one-term John. I don't own any shares in Kiwirail, well perhaps a few well maybe as many as ten thousand I can't remember...

geo   #8   09:46 am Feb 11 2010

This Mr key is a liar. Say what you mean.Mr flip flop lives on. Remember "explaining is losing".

jennifer   #9   09:49 am Feb 11 2010

"Bill English also promised not to raise GST, but simply told Parliament yesterday that the Labour Party had done such a rubbish job of managing the economy that National didn't have much choice."

Colin, don't tell me you are still falling for that tired old line? I guess he could re-introduce the death penalty, say that it's because Labour did such a rubbish job on crime, and you would swallow it?

Rangi   #10   09:50 am Feb 11 2010

The biggest flaw in our politicians appears to be the need to seek the approval of the media. I agree your solution is a good one Colin, vis-a-vi "things have moved on", "was not our intention" etc etc, but John Key seems to be a good statesman caught in a bad politician's body. If only we could figure a way of getting our politicians intentions to the masses without distraction & spin from the media. Rangi.


Show 11-60 of 210 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content