Safer journeys need to be sensible too

Last updated 17:02 05/03/2010

Transport Minister Steven Joyce has had a busy week on the road safety front, and there's a lot of information before the public to chew over.

Joyce has been careful to deliver the information contained in the Ministry of Transport's Safer Journeys document in such a way as it appears as if he's consulting, so that when Cabinet makes its decisions next month they won't come as too much of a surprise.

Like with the whole debate over cellphones in cars, you can see which way this is likely to go but Joyce is careful about getting too far ahead of public opinion.

It's pretty clear that the right-hand rule is going to be changed so that traffic turning right must give way to other traffic either going straight ahead or turning left.

Personally I like the current rule, but that's probably just because I grew up with it and I'm used to it. I'm not convinced that this is a problem that needs fixing, actually, but one argument is that the left-turn rule is the one most widely used internationally and New Zealand should fall into line.

I don't think many people are going to complain, either, about plans to lower the alcohol limit for drivers under the age of 20 to zero. Even when I was 15 I was frankly amazed that I was old enough to drive a car and I now know that quite frankly I wasn't. Add alcohol - of any amount - to the general lack of experience or maturity of a young driver and it's a lethal combination.

Federated Farmers is up in arms about a related proposal to raise the driving age to 16, arguing it will unfairly hurt rural communities. I don't think this holds true. The young people will simply have to wait an extra year before they can drive. Personally I'd make the driving age even higher - 17 or even 18.

Another option not explored by transport officials is lowering the speed limit for young drivers to, say, 80kmh - particularly since young drivers are more than two-and-a-half times more likely to have speed as a contributing factor in fatal accidents.

I'm not so convinced about suggestions that the drink-drive limit be cut from 0.08 grams per 100ml of blood to 0.05, however. Don't get me wrong, I'm not advocating drinking and driving. But I like law changes to be based on sound evidence and research, and Joyce himself happily admits there's not enough in this area.

Figures I got from Joyce's office yesterday show just 152 drivers out of more than 2000 breathalysed following accidents between 2004 and 2008 had a breath alcohol level of between 0.05 and 0.08 (i.e. would be caught by a law change).

Now I know the data is incomplete and there are plenty of reasons why this might be so (additional fluids given by paramedics will change the results, etc) but even so, that's hardly compelling evidence that people who have two glasses of wine after work and drive home are causing accidents.

As is so often the case, it's the people who drink to excess that are the real problem, and they're simply not going to be deterred by a lowering of the blood/alcohol limit. They're already way over the current limit. It's the little old ladies with a couple of sherries under their belts who will be caught out by this if it goes ahead.

I agree with the suggestions around graduated speed limits contained in the report. The idea is that some roads would be graded at under 100kmh, particularly older rural roads that were not designed to be safe at higher speeds.

However, wouldn't it be nice if we were treated like adults, and transport officials admitted what we all know is the case: that there are also roads where a speed above 100kmh is safe. I'm thinking here of some of the urban dual-carriage motorways, and dead-straight, beautifully engineered roads around the MacKenzie Basin in the South Island. Or, in summer, the Desert Road.

Other countries do this. Even Australia, home of the police state, has graduated speeds. In Queensland, some of the motorways are 110kmh. In Northern Territory, some roads have no speed limit. In much of Europe, speeds go as high as 130kmh.

I'd be far more likely to give the police a pat on the back if they patrolled dangerous driving on bad country roads than sitting in their vehicles with the speed gun waiting to pot a motorist doing 112kmh down a motorway.

As long as Joyce can point to evidence for changes to the road code, and has wide public backing for commonsense alterations, he's unlikely to run into too much trouble.

» Follow NZStuffBlogs on Twitter and get fast updates on all Stuff's blogs.

89 comments
Post a comment
jennifer   #1   05:14 pm Mar 05 2010

Colin, I predicted a while back, after the GST thing turned to custard for them, that they would be trolling through the cabinet papers looking for things to bring forward to announce to divert attention. This road safety stuff is just the latest example.

KiwiKraut   #2   05:22 pm Mar 05 2010

Colin What I find the most interesting is that there is still no push towards making a driving license really hard to get, like in Europe, particularly Germany. You'd pay $1500 or so, do 30 compulsory lessons or more, many tests, but at the end of it, boy, you can drive when you pass! Also, over there it's a real event to get your license. Here it's, ah well, ho hum so what. In fact, anyone who fails a license test here needs their head examined for missing bits. They might as well give them away. I guess we don't have the industry yet to do all the testing, but they could move towards it at least. So on the whole package, too conservative, sorry Joyce! As for your suggestion to have faster speeds on selected part of the grid, I say Colin for President.

Teddie   #3   05:29 pm Mar 05 2010

What about contracting out traffic control to the private sector. Get the police back onto 100% serious crime patrol.

Darth Michael   #4   05:30 pm Mar 05 2010

This is the National government. John Key and his National Party colleagues were elected to protect and defend our most basic liberties from the big-government bullies on the left.

*cough*

Surely they would never clutch at ANY excuse to impose new laws and regulations to further restrict our few remaining freedoms...

Fred   #5   07:00 pm Mar 05 2010

Ya have to laugh don't ya! this lot are so nanny state beyond belief. Wern't we all promised less meddling with petty rules, less bureaucracy, less nosing in our personal affairs an so on, and what have we got? we got a smiley nanny who has to fiddle with everything. What about some real jobs for the young ones eh.

Kat   #6   07:21 pm Mar 05 2010

Fred, the govt can't/won't provide jobs for the young or anybody for that matter. It is beyond them. They have worked out a cunning plan though. By raising all this populist poll driven infotainment dross sideshows attention will be diverted from the real issues facing the country. You know, to name a few, promissed wage parity with Aus, higher OECD ranking, brighter future!....laughable isn't it.

Mike   #7   07:55 pm Mar 05 2010

Labour lite the party of responsibility, the party that said no to the nanny state, the party that would see us the equal of australia the party of less govt - oh how we laugh at the less govt involvement in growing the economy and more govt involvment in all other aspects of our life. As I have said - some will say time and time again - but then like a good song it just gets better - so here goes, Labour lite have no ideas and merely maintain the status quo. Now watch all the labour lite lovers defend their nanny state pals it's comical. And Cully's sidekick and sheelagh will be demanding Colin only writes what they want him to - do you think they are hoping for a cabinet posting?

Captain Rehab   #8   08:13 pm Mar 05 2010

"Figures I got from Joyce's office yesterday"

See Colin? Right there. That's where that whole independent journalism thing goes out the window.

Funny thing is you didn't even blink.

BATMAN   #9   08:18 pm Mar 05 2010

Give way rules: they don't need changing, just better education and encouraging people to actually use those things called indicators.

Driving age: meh, too soft. should be at least 17, possibly 18. and 1 year learner period and mandatory driving lessons from a qualified instructor.

Drinking limit: i was shocked to discover from the other Espiner how much you really can drink before hitting the drink drive limit, as neither the police, NZTA, or ALAC provide the alcohol consumption guides that used to exist.

Colin: good point about the graduated speeds, though i fear this will never happen as evidenced by the new digital speed signs on the wellington motorway. it appears that the new signs merely enable the traffic nazis to lower the speed limit from 100, first down to 80kmh and then down to 60kmh(on a MOTORWAY!!!!!) for no apparent reason other than the daily rush hour and the excuse of "queues ahead". this is something which is proved very unpopular in Britain and is basically those sneeky socialist public servants trying to control us!

what really should be happening is raising the speed limit during rush hour to smooth the traffic flow.

SAVE OUR MOTORWAYS!

peachey   #10   11:02 pm Mar 05 2010

As a parent of an 11 year old, I'm relieved the driving age is being increased, but think 17 would be better. Yes I was driving at 15, but cars were slower and the roads not as busy in those days. I'm worried about the give way to the left law, but I suppose I'll get used to it...I hope so anyway. It's good to see National actually doing something this year, but it feels like they're just fiddling, not doing anything major or contentious.


Show 11-60 of 89 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content