Government's handbrake U-turns

Last updated 13:39 16/03/2010

Smell that burning rubber? It's the stench left by the Government as it executes a series of handbrake U-turns.

It seems everywhere you look at the moment, National is backing away from policies that are controversial. Just about the only area in which the Government is refusing any compromise is national education standards, where Education Minister Anne Tolley has been given permission to plough ahead regardless of the opposition.

Not that I'm complaining. I think a government that listens to the people is a good government. But I do wonder about the political nous that is being employed in the Beehive at the moment.

For a man of Steven Joyce's brainpower and status within the Government, he royally stuffed up his handling of the review of the SuperGold card for superannuitants last week. Given he is Communications Minister as well as Transport, he didn't do a very good job of communicating his intentions.

Either that or the Government had a sudden attack of cold feet over changes to the gold card. It was pretty clear from a release written last Thursday that the Government was considering changes to the scheme, including redefining what is meant by off-peak travel and reviewing high-cost services including the Waiheke Island ferry, the Wairarapa train service, and the airport express buses.

In his initial release, Joyce said:

"Among other things, officials will consider: the level of reimbursement operators and councils receive;  how 'off peak' should be defined; [and] the eligibility of certain high cost services - including the Waiheke ferry and the train service between Wellington and the Wairarapa."

He added: "The government is committed to the scheme but some changes will need to be made because it is currently on track to exceed the available budget. The highest priority of the review process is to consider how to keep the scheme within the available budget of $18 million a year, while continuing to provide improved mobility for older people."

Pretty clear, I'd have thought. But the following day, blaming his political opponents' "scaremongering'', Joyce said: "We have made it clear all along that the government is totally committed to the SuperGold Card, including the transport concession as it stands.''

This morning, admitting he'd been "a bit imprecise'' Joyce said: "The Government never had any intention to alter the availability of services for SuperGold Card recipients.''

Clearly it did, however, which raises the question, who in the upper echelons of the Beehive thought it a good idea to pick a fight with 540,000 old people for the sake of $18 million?

I sense a similar wavering of commitment over this whole mining issue. From Gerry Brownlee's original gung-ho speech to miners, in which he spoke of his desire to open up schedule four land in the conservation estate, to John Key's recent "hang on a minute'' prevarication, something seems to have changed.

Originally we were supposed to get a discussion document on the government's plans in February, but this has been again delayed. Key said yesterday it wouldn't arrive for a few more weeks. He also said its scope had been broadened to include land outside schedule four, which surprised me because I thought that was always the intention.

The problem the government has is that it's looking longingly at all that money tied up under our national parks but it just knows it will pick a huge fight with the environmental movement if it tries. And probably wider New Zealand as well.

So it's looking for bits of the conservation estate that are not national parks and not that pretty but still presumably worth conserving. I'm not sure it's worth the political hassle when there is all that gas and oil sitting off the coast under the sea that Brownlee could concentrate on without any of the bad publicity. I'm thinking Key is thinking the same thing.

There's yet another U-turn - or at least a pause for thought - occurring over the state sector reforms. Originally planned for announcement last week, it was delayed again on Monday and now seems to be on the backburner.

Given the Government was all set to move and even had space booked for an announcement last Wednesday, this seems a remarkable last-minute change of heart. Whether it's because the unions have threatened them with an injunction or whether it's simply a cost-benefit analysis showing up some issues, I'm not sure.

But it seems to me National is getting a little cautious all of a sudden across a number of areas where previously it was full steam ahead.  

» Follow NZStuffBlogs on Twitter and get fast updates on all Stuff's blogs.

117 comments
Post a comment
sam auck   #1   01:55 pm Mar 16 2010

Groucho Marx sums up John Key's government:

"Those are my principles, and if you don't like them ... I have others."

Andrew Stevenson   #2   02:11 pm Mar 16 2010

I reckon part of the reason Nat/ACT is so popular at the moment (what is it, Sheelagh, 60%?) is that they have backed off the big changes.

They've generally kept in place a lot of the left-wing schemes (SuperGold card, interest-free student loans, Working for Families, Kiwibank, KiwiSaver etc etc) because they know that to repeal them would lose them a lot of votes.

(I think I am making the fair assumption that Nat/ACTs are philosophically opposed to the above, even though they may not state it explicitly.)

While I don't mind this (speaking as a Labour party member) how do National voters feel? Particularly the swing ones who aren't wedded to a particular party and make their mind up election by election? Do you feel you've got the change you voted for?

jennifer   #3   02:12 pm Mar 16 2010

Looks like Jackboot got ahead of his polling. But now the hard numbers are finally in, it's time for the government to make some principled decisions. I guess we'll have to wait for the results from the Auckland CCO focus groups before that flip flop hits the news.

David   #4   02:18 pm Mar 16 2010

JK should grow a couple and get on with it as thats why we voted for him. If we didnt want NZ to get ahead we all would have voted for the Greens. How about a bit of leadership Mr Key.

John   #5   02:22 pm Mar 16 2010

Yes, handbrakes all round. These are just the latest of a string of issues stretching back to before the election, that Key has reversed or slowed. Where's the backbone!

Late last year a Minister was spouting forth that the government was there to help our sector, but when we met him recently all we got was platitudes. To me, there is nothing worse than saying you will do something, no ifs, buts or maybes, and then failing to deliver.

Meanwhile, Key retains his popularity.

Matt   #6   02:29 pm Mar 16 2010

Unprincipled and incompetent is a pretty good summation of this government, but then it's a pretty good summation of what it means to be a Tory.

Sheelagh   #7   02:30 pm Mar 16 2010

Andrew Stevenson (2)

Didn't think Labour supporters took any notice of the polls ,Andrew.

Murray   #8   02:38 pm Mar 16 2010

" Government rejects Auckland Commonwealth Games support By COLIN ESPINER Last updated 14:19 16/03/2010 " Stuff website

No Lands Tax , but central government support for local authority works will be off the agenda - " Put your rates up ", they will be told.

Kevin   #9   02:51 pm Mar 16 2010

David #4 you say 'JK should grow a couple and get on with it as thats why we voted for him' and 'How about a bit of leadership Mr Key'

Well we had a leader, some people even called her our dear leader.

JK then said we wanted change and to vote for change.

People then voted for this change and we now have it, no leader, as requested.

Andrew Stevenson   #10   02:52 pm Mar 16 2010

Sheelagh: I trained as a statistician, got my first real job at Heylen and used to work for Colmar, so it's partly professional interest.

Anyway, politicians of all colours pretend to ignore the polls when they're behind. *grin*


Show 11-60 of 117 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content