Insurers, EQC urged to settle drilling impasse

Last updated 10:26 20/09/2012

Relevant offers

Christchurch earthquake

'Overkill' central Christchurch intersection has 19 lights Home owners aghast at fee for Southern Response class action Court of Appeal seeks to rein in 'shemozzle' arising from CTV building case Christchurch Dilemmas: Taking power back in Christchurch Steel mesh in some homes could be non-compliant Housing provider set to use shipping containers for emergency housing A new job and a new town for the Johnson family after Canterbury's earthquakes Christchurch Dilemmas: Christchurch's mental health crisis Nationwide building boom creating next leaky buildings crisis Avonside family home one of the last for demolition on Christchurch's flat land red zone

Insurance companies and the Earthquake Commission have been urged to "stop mucking around" after talks on collaborative drilling broke down.

The two groups have been negotiating for months about working together on geotechnical drilling of over-cap Christchurch properties.

Technical category 3 property owners need to have their land assessed to determine what repairs are needed and if new foundations need to be designed.

The EQC is responsible for drilling under-cap TC3 properties - those with less than $100,000 damage.

Parklands TC3 Residents' Group spokeswoman Kiri Hider said the commission should never have got involved in over-cap drilling.

"It's how it always should have been, that over-cap was in the arms of private insurers. It should never have been with EQC," she said.

"Let's stop mucking around and start some serious drilling."

Hider had been critical of the confusion the talks had created, with residents unsure who to speak to and getting conflicting messages from the commission and their insurer.

IAG Canterbury recovery executive manager Dean MacGregor said EQC-insurer co-operation was worth investigating, despite it falling outside the commission's mandate, but "maybe it took a little longer than it should have".

How collaborative drilling would be managed was a sticking point, MacGregor said.

"One of the issues we had was we wanted to prioritise our customers.

"We want customers whose homes are uninhabitable, the elderly or people that have other stresses in their life to be a priority," he said.

"If we are committed to a collaborative programme, that [priority] may not necessarily fit with a geographic- type system."

Drilling density was also a problem, MacGregor said, and insurers might have had to redrill some areas the EQC had covered.

"We were getting some initial feedback . . . the density was not coming up.

"They were still having to drill quite a high proportion of the sites," he said.

Ad Feedback

- The Press


Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content