Major insurers deny 'passing the buck'

MICHAEL WRIGHT
Last updated 05:00 17/11/2012

Relevant offers

Christchurch earthquake

Five questions to mark five years since September 2010 New walking trail through Christchurch's red-zone Christchurch rebuild agencies rate poorly in infrastructure industry survey New Sabin Holloway exhibition captures aftermath of Christchurch earthquake Ann Brower: Fix the parapets first Chemical company lend hand to housing scheme No appeal after Graeme Robinson incompetence claims quashed Brooklands: The town the Government couldn't kill Judge: Cera's slow demolitions not to blame for arsons Aftershock: Fiona Farrell's white-hot response to the Christchurch earthquake

Vero Insurance has rejected a "speculative" claim by the Earthquake Commission (EQC) that providers may try to pass the buck on their earthquake costs.

In the commission's 2011-12 annual report, released last week, chairman Michael Wintringham said private insurers faced paying huge sums to settle commercial and residential claims in Canterbury

"In this environment, there is an incentive for insurers to reduce their own liabilities by shifting costs to the Crown or to other parties," he said.

Vero chief executive Gary Dransfield dismissed the comment as "speculative [and] unsubstantiated".

"It suggests insurers would act or are acting improperly and in a manner not in the interests of New Zealand, its Government or the people of Canterbury," he said.

"The reality is that the contribution of insurers to the Christchurch recovery has saved the Government billions of dollars."

Insurers and reinsurers would meet about 80 per cent of the rebuild cost, Dransfield said, and private insurers had already paid out $5 billion in claims.

"If that cost had to be met by the New Zealand Government alone there would be a massive rise in corporate and personal taxes to meet the bill."

IAG chief executive Jacki Johnson said: "The insinuation is unhelpful, but we don't want this to distract from our efforts, which are focused on our customers' claims."

Peter Rose, chief executive of AMI's claims management company, Southern Response, was unperturbed by Wintringham's comment. "When you read in the report it's quite appropriate what he said. The whole process of apportionment shifts money in both directions," he said. "I don't think he's alleging there are improper practices."

Ad Feedback

- The Press

Comments

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content