Groping healer has appeal rejected

KIRSTY JOHNSTON
Last updated 06:41 07/11/2012

Relevant offers

Crime

David Hunter admits shooting business associate Dean Louis in thigh Despite offender's ninth drink drive conviction, he was no 'hellraiser', says lawyer Escaped prisoner Dion King says he ate a lightbulb to get away from guard SkyCity worker given home detention after stealing $45,000 worth of chips Convicted conman Simon Bom on the run in Christchurch Trader of child abuse images Stephen John Laing denied parole Woman kept rented Commodore car but it was stolen from her, Hawera court hears Alleged rest home abuser appears in court Police drop charges against activists who stormed Auckland offices Mass shooting in New Zealand 'inevitable' without action on gun laws, MPs warned

A spiritual healer who touched a girl's breast and called it "beautiful" while treating her for stomach cramps has had his appeal rejected.

Suresh Chaturgoon Gobindlal, 57, from Auckland was found guilty of indecent assault on a girl aged under 16 last year, after the incident in an upstairs bedroom at her home.

Court documents show Gobindlal practises a technique known as "Pranic" healing, a no-touch system where practitioners manipulate aura to restore balance to the life-force.

He had offered to treat the girl during a visit to her home on Christmas Day, 2010, when she complained of stomach pains.

Gobindlal took the girl upstairs to a bedroom and got her to lie on her back. Once he'd closed the bedroom door he made her lie down, then put his had down her top and touched her breasts, calling them "beautiful".

He told the girl what had happened was "confidential", however, a few days later she told a friend, then her mother, and the police were called.

At trial Gobindlal's wife and son testified that despite the "no-touch" Pranic philosophy, "when practised at higher level the technique can involve touching".

The jury found him guilty. Gobindlal was sentenced to eight months home detention.

He appealed the sentence and conviction on the grounds that his lawyer made a mistake, but it was dismissed by the Court of Appeal yesterday.

He will continue to serve his sentence.

Ad Feedback

- Auckland Now

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content