Groping healer has appeal rejected

KIRSTY JOHNSTON
Last updated 06:41 07/11/2012

Relevant offers

Crime

Rise of sex predator female teachers: 'This is no Romeo and Juliet romance' Aggravated robbery at Waikato petrol station Woman stabbed in neck near Manurewa RSA in Auckland Jonathan Milne: Like 'em or loathe 'em, Destiny Church pastors are teaching prison inmates to take responsibility Serco bans Brian Tamaki's son-in-law from South Auckland prison SAS calling for 'integrity' in wake of Afghanistan death revelations Parents and newborn baby intercepted in desperate boat bid to reach NZ, detained in Indonesia My sweetheart the murderer: Kiwi falls in love with American prisoner serving life without parole Pre-employment drug testing shows increase in meth use by professionals Asylum seekers locked up in Auckland prison – New Zealand's own Manus Island

A spiritual healer who touched a girl's breast and called it "beautiful" while treating her for stomach cramps has had his appeal rejected.

Suresh Chaturgoon Gobindlal, 57, from Auckland was found guilty of indecent assault on a girl aged under 16 last year, after the incident in an upstairs bedroom at her home.

Court documents show Gobindlal practises a technique known as "Pranic" healing, a no-touch system where practitioners manipulate aura to restore balance to the life-force.

He had offered to treat the girl during a visit to her home on Christmas Day, 2010, when she complained of stomach pains.

Gobindlal took the girl upstairs to a bedroom and got her to lie on her back. Once he'd closed the bedroom door he made her lie down, then put his had down her top and touched her breasts, calling them "beautiful".

He told the girl what had happened was "confidential", however, a few days later she told a friend, then her mother, and the police were called.

At trial Gobindlal's wife and son testified that despite the "no-touch" Pranic philosophy, "when practised at higher level the technique can involve touching".

The jury found him guilty. Gobindlal was sentenced to eight months home detention.

He appealed the sentence and conviction on the grounds that his lawyer made a mistake, but it was dismissed by the Court of Appeal yesterday.

He will continue to serve his sentence.

Ad Feedback

- Auckland Now

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content