Shooting of armed man in Otaki 'justified'

Last updated 12:17 30/11/2012

Relevant offers

Crime

Men 'with handgun' rob Auckland bar Malaysian diplomat in custody after court appearance Knife robber still at large Daughter waits for her dad 8 years on Police raids net large drug haul in Rotorua Missing drugs: More thefts from police safe Former racing official pleads guilty to fraud Burglaries unsolved as police face strain Malaysian diplomat heads to NZ Milton man charged over double fatality

A police officer fired through a wardrobe door to wound a man after he threatened them with a gun.

William Hartley suffered gunshot wounds to his right hand and forearm and was arrested at the Otaki home during the incident in February last year.

His cocked rifle was found fully loaded with eight rounds including one in the breach.

Following an investigation into the incident the Independent Police Conduct Authority (IPCA) today said police were justified in shooting Hartley.

However, it criticised police for not wearing ballistic body armour while carrying firearms and failing to update update the National Intelligence Application to include reference to Hartley’s unconfirmed possession and access to firearms.

The shooting followed a complaint by a woman who called for help after a domestic assault on February 14 about 10.30am.

The woman alleged that Hartley had assaulted her and left her on the side of the road in Levin. She alleged that Hartley had threatened to shoot her and had access to firearms although she had not seen them.
The information was not recorded by police in the intelligence application. The woman was interviewed while police tried unsuccessfully to catch Hartley.

After monitoring his home for over a week four police carrying firearms and a Taser were sent to try and find him again. About 1.20am on February 24 they advised the central communications centre they planned to raid his home. They were not wearing ballistic body armour.

Through a gap in the curtains police saw Hartley leave the lounge and walk down the hallway towards the rear of the house. At the same time police arrested another person at the home for obstructing their entry.

By the time police got inside the house Hartley had barricaded himself in a bedroom using furniture and, despite repeated requests, refused to come out.

An officer could see Hartley through a hole in a the door standing in the centre of the room ‘‘apparently unarmed and posing no obvious threat’’.

A short time later police forced their way into the room after an officer saw Hartley  ‘‘make movements’’ which led him believe he was going to hurt himself.

As they entered the room he ‘‘partially secreted’’ himself in a wardrobe and produced a gun which he pointed at one officer, who retreated from the room and drew his gun.

Hartley switched his attention to another officer who ‘‘saw the rifle barrel pointing at him from a distance of about two metres, drew his Glock pistol and fired two rounds through the wardrobe door’’.

Ad Feedback

In his findings IPCA chairman Judge Sir David Carruthers said police had ‘‘complied with the law and had used sound judgment’’.

“The officer was justified in using force to defend himself and the force was not excessive in the circumstances,” Sir David said.

He recommended all staff be reminded of police policy and their obligation to wear the armour when carrying guns.

Hartley was found guilty of two charges of using a firearm against a police and sentenced to four years’ imprisonment in August.

- The Dominion Post

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content