Liquidator loses fraud appeal bid

SALLY KIDSON
Last updated 12:04 07/12/2013

Relevant offers

Crime

Dairy owners cry out for intervention as robberies continue Woman who defrauded Wellington Airport and ACC has sentence reduced Ashburton man found guilty of manslaughter and assault of Arran Gairns Return of stolen medals a 'great relief' to former Army major who missed Anzac Day Jaden Stroobant sentenced to preventive detention over violation, murder of Cun Xiu Tian Two heinous crimes, one common denominator: Meth Arun Kumar's teenage killer paroled and back at school Turning corner saves repeat Waikato drunk driver from jail Man arrested for robbing the Rangiora Mini Mart in 2016 Dome Valley trio jailed for kidnapping, attempted murder

Former Nelson liquidator Pat Norris will spend Christmas on home detention after he lost his bid to go to New Zealand's highest court.

Norris applied for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court after his attempt to get a fraud conviction quashed in the Court of Appeal was dismissed.

Norris was found guilty of stealing $80,900 from the liquidation of Auckland company Astra Enterprises following a judge-alone trial last year. The judge found Norris had used the money for personal and business expenses.

Norris was sentenced to 10 months' home detention and ordered to pay Upper Moutere couple Maureen and Kelvin Manley $31,724. That reparation was quashed in the Court of Appeal, but he was ordered to pay an increased amount of $40,000 to Astra Enterprises.

The Supreme Court dismissed Norris' application to appeal the Court of Appeal decision this week. Norris argued that as a liquidator he did not have a duty to the creditors to account for a company's funds. He also wanted to argue there should be no conviction for theft where a liquidator has legally taken fees.

Supreme Court Justices John McGrath, William Young and Susan Glazebrook ruled Astra's funds were not available for Norris to use for his own purposes and he had to deal with them in accordance with his liquidator's duties. They agreed there was evidence to support the trial judge's finding that Norris had followed a blatantly dishonest course to cover up his failure to account for Astra's property.

Ad Feedback

- Nelson

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content