Cushioned lives 'holding back kids'

BY DAVE BURGESS
Last updated 05:00 19/03/2009
MAARTEN HOLL/The Dominion Post
CHILD AT HEART: Christoph Baker, an international expert on child-friendly cities, tries out the Frank Kitts playground.

Relevant offers

Education

School unapologetic for chewing gum expulsion Former principal gets community work New degree to boost te reo ACT banks on charter schools New degree to boost te reo Critics dispute Family First findings on day care Massey education students' year begins Principals give Govt an 'F' on class sizes Christchurch schools use recruitment firm Boy genius may finish school at 15

Kiwi children are over-protected, live in a virtual world and are less capable of shaping their futures than those living in war zones, according to a visiting expert.

Christoph Baker, of Unicef, was in Wellington yesterday to promote the organisation's Child Friendly Cities Initiative.

The programme, which began in 1996, fosters the rights and needs of youngsters aged up to 18 so they can play a bigger role in the development of local government policy.

Dr Baker, who is based in Italy, said "over-protectionism" of children was an obstacle to their healthy development.

"We are so caught up with making sure our kids are hyper-protected, we are getting caught in a loop where everything has to be under control ... but a child has to discover on his or her own what the limits are."

Children were more able to influence their environment in war-ravaged areas such as the Gaza Strip, where more than half the population is aged under 18.

"These kids are way ahead of all the kids who have these cushioned lifestyles [in the West] because they are taking their life into their own hands. It is these kids who often take on their own destiny.

"That's not what is happening in our super-affluent societies. It condemns them [children] to this virtual world which is there in front of their computer ... which often has negative messages."

Dr Baker said local councils should ask for, and listen to, the input of children so they could influence growth and come to love where they live.

"They need to get into participatory urban planning with children. Once you let the imagination of children run free, it is fantastic, the results you get back."

In Italy, it had led to public monuments being adopted by children who were responsible for maintenance and promotion through a contract with the local mayor.

In another project, the mayor of a small town listened to complaints from kindergarten kids who thought their school was painted in dull colours.

"The school became colourful with yellows, blues and greens. The whole village loved it."

Other goals of the initiative were to ensure children had safe drinking water, good healthcare and education, and were protected from exploitation, violence and abuse.

Dr Baker met city councillors and senior officers while in Wellington. He is the main speaker at the New Zealand Community Boards conference in Christchurch, which starts tomorrow.

Ad Feedback

- © Fairfax NZ News

7 comments
Post a comment
Al   #7   12:59 pm Mar 20 2009

Well who didn't know this already. We have weak ass kids who aren't allowed to do anything that might "hurt them"!

Same goes for us adults. Too much over-protection and cushioning. Are we really this delicate that a paper cut in the office needs to be reported, or when outdoors you need to report that you slipped on some mud and fell??? Oh dear, how can me eliminate, isolate or minimise this boo hoo.

I reckon a lot of it is to do with too much OSH and health and safety. People and organisations are too afraid to allow anything because they might get done for it.

A lot of it is common sense so if you get hurt it's your fault i reckon. Need to deal with this and harden up NZ.

We're going to get our butts kicked in future wars the way things are going.

Bdub   #6   10:38 am Mar 20 2009

Isn't it funny how these international experts on one hand complain that New Zealand's accidental child death and injure rates are way too high and now on the other hand complain of New Zealand being overprotective of our children. So which is it????

Dan   #5   02:48 pm Mar 19 2009

A little bit of rolling around in the mud does wonders for the immune system.

reaL talk   #4   12:44 pm Mar 19 2009

This guy is a regular sherlock holmes. The 2 groups are from completely different standings in the world. If you've got bombs dropping on your house day in day out, you're gona be..obviously..just that little bit harder than the kiwi kid dreaming about it on his computer game. You're probably gona learn how to get things done a little more efficiently when your bros and sisters are relying on you to bring the food home.

One is desperate to get to the next LEVEL the other one is desperate to get to the next DAY. Apparently you gota be a doctor to bring up this contrast.

Paul   #3   12:30 pm Mar 19 2009

"Children were more able to influence their environment in war-ravaged areas such as the Gaza Strip"

Typical rubbish from a typical UN organisation.

NZ kids aren't over-protected, in fact schools go overboard these days promoting self-sufficiency in outdoors trips, sometimes at the cost of lives.

Perception of overprotection is perhaps from parents dropping-off kids to school where kids used to walk to school by themselves. However the current lax attitude to prisoner parole and the number of offenders on the streets and community care of mental health patients means that such protection on the streets is almost mandatory.

NZ law itself forces over-protection - kids under 14 aren't allowed to be at home by themselves! Yet Christoph Baker and others are encouraging kids to be in the much more dangerous streets by themselves !

Arthur   #2   10:46 am Mar 19 2009

As usual it takes an overseas expert to come here and point out the obvious. A few painful knocks at play in childhood is a fast learning tool. Perhaps if we abandondon the seduction of the technology nonsense that is thrust at us everyday by people interested in sales spreadsheets and concentrated on reality we'll all be better off. As for Nick at #1, he does have trustworthy face doesn't he? Not so sure about the beard but I guess it is appropriately scholarly.

Nick   #1   09:45 am Mar 19 2009

Well that fella has a trustworthy face, I'll believe what he says!

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content