Failing students a costly burden

Last updated 23:33 23/09/2008

Relevant offers

Education

School unapologetic for chewing gum expulsion Former principal gets community work New degree to boost te reo ACT banks on charter schools New degree to boost te reo Critics dispute Family First findings on day care Massey education students' year begins Principals give Govt an 'F' on class sizes Christchurch schools use recruitment firm Boy genius may finish school at 15

Troublesome students cost the education system 10 times as much as others, a government report on the state of New Zealand's schools reveals.

The annual report into the compulsory schools sector in New Zealand, tabled by Education Minister Chris Carter in Parliament yesterday, highlights marginal students as a leading concern.

"One of the most pressing issues our education system faces is supporting students considered to be at risk of educational and societal failure," the report said.

"Many of these students exhibit behaviour difficulties."

The report said intervention and support for children with the most severe behavioural problems was critical.

"These behaviours are persistent, outside the age-expected norm and expressed across social settings," it said.

The public cost of services for children with severe conduct problems was about 10 times that for children of the same age without conduct problems.

"Although most New Zealand students are actively engaged in education, educators face a number of challenges, especially around disciplinary issues, including student safety, school environment and managing difficult behaviours," the report said.

An earlier report by the Ministry of Social Development found up to 5 per cent of primary and intermediate schoolchildren have a conduct disorder or severe anti-social behaviour.

The report was released hours after a New Zealand Council for Educational Research (NZCER) survey was circulated by the Post Primary Teachers' Association (PPTA).

The survey of teachers in the greater Wellington area found just over half said the severe behaviour of students limited the activities they would try with their classes.

"From the survey, it is clear that the impact on all of the other students of that disruption is really severe," PPTA Hutt Valley regional executive member Martin Henry said.

Henry will present a paper on school discipline at next week's PPTA conference which recommends funding be attached to students identified as a problem.

"These kids are in every classroom and every school and we think they need a funding formula that is attached directly to them," Henry said.

The NZCER survey found an estimated 9% of students exhibited severely disruptive behaviour.

It also found:

41% of teachers were anxious about the severe behaviour of students.

28% said it made their general health poorer.

32% said that it undermined their confidence.

9% said they were frightened of students with severe behaviour.

Ad Feedback

REPORT FINDINGS

32% of students who started NCEA in 2005 came out in 2007 with three qualifications an increase from the 26% of the 2002 cohort.

Just over one-fifth (21%) of students of the 2005 cohort came out with no NCEA qualifications down from 25% in 2006.

The number of students leaving school with no qualification of any kind was 18% in 2007, down from 25% in 2006 and 27% in 2005.

In 2007, 81% of 16-year-olds, 61% of 17-year-olds and 13% of 18-year-olds stayed on at school.

Female students achieved at higher rates than males, with 45% attaining at least a university entrance qualification, compared with 33% of male students.

Total government per-student funding of schools increased by 22.2% between 2003 and 2007, compared with an inflation rate of 11.6% over the same period.

During 2007, the Ministry of Education made 53 statutory interventions on school boards, compared with 51 in 2006 and 55 in 2005. 

 

 

- © Fairfax NZ News

5 comments
bob   #5   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Pull the problem kids out and put them into a special insitution with the behavioural experts, psychologists, heck even with a paddy wagon nearby. Stop punishing the teachers and other kids with the dangerous antisocial, bullying behaviours let those who want to learn learn get on with learning get the distractions out of the classrooms, let the teachers teach, they are not socialworkers.

They need special attention anyways most will be the taggers, the bullies, the future criminals so get them the attention they need and everyone will benefit.

Sick of people blaming the kid   #4   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

After dealing with what society calls the drop outs, I have found that it is the education system that needs to be revamped, it is out dated and the students find the curriculum boring and not as relevent to what happens out in the "real world". Why is it not incorporated into teacher training college that you must have a level of how to deal with troubled students, rather then writting them off and sending them to alternative schools, where funding is limited. If a child is hyperactive does this mean they are troubled and should be somewhere else or is it that the education system should put more funding into extra staff to deal with the student within the school, rather then isolate them. This debate will go on and on until the only students left are the ones who succeed and show no emotions. One thing I have seen is that some schools would like troubled teens out of the school because it looks like a reflection on the school, when an actual fact, If I were to have a troubled teen I would want them in a school that knows how to deal with them rather then have them pushed out to an alternative school. Education is not only about academia anymore there is a level of social work that needs to be involved in acheiving academia levels, unfortunately the pay parity does not not fit into the teachers salary.

Meigui   #3   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

One solution would be to scrap both compulsory education and the youth benefit. It wouldn't solve the problem entirely, but it would make life for those who want to be in school - and teachers - a whole lot easier.

Hadley   #2   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

Why would kids wanna try at school when its far easier to just drop out, get the benefit pump out some kids and collect $$ from the govt? They've (the government) made it too easy to live as a failure.

Cern   #1   05:26 pm Jan 28 2009

its all this binge drinking and graffiti, time to crack skuls

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content