Accused teacher loses grievance case

ROB KIDD
Last updated 18:02 15/12/2013

Relevant offers

Education

$16k funding cut confirmed for Picton School Principals reject sex education 'pleasure zone' teaching University entrance rates down, NCEA pass rates up Pleasure could be taught in New Zealand sexual education classes NCEA gains are real - Ministry of Education chief exec Peter Hughes Aranui Community Campus founding principal is Andy Kai Fong Editorial: Student data part of complex puzzle NCEA excellence and merit endorsements more than double NCEA pass rates increases 'don't reflect genuine increase in learning' Waimate High School's unique NCEA challenge

An Auckland teacher accused of calling pupils “slag”, “loser” and “prick” has had her personal grievance case dismissed.

Barbara McConnell, a teacher at Mount Roskill Grammar School, took her case before the Employment Relations Authority who ruled the school acted lawfully while dealing with the situation.

In September last year, McConnell was covering a music class of 30 year-nine students for another teacher.

During the class, several students alleged she called a female pupil “slag”, two boys “loser” and “prick”, mocked students’ names, made derogatory comments about ethnicities, said banding occurred by ethnicity, talked about suicide, suggested a student may be bashed and a teacher may be fired.

McConnell, who has taught at the school for more than 10 years, made some concessions but denied using the offensive language.

At their next class, the students involved told another teacher and principal Greg Watson confronted McConnell.

The decision was made she would work from home on full pay while the matter was investigated.

After two disciplinary meetings with the board of trustees over the following two weeks, McConnell was given a final written warning.

The board found she had used the language complained of.

While she was on leave, the board raised concerns about her “emailing and texting staff setting out her version of events and blaming a student whose parents she believed had complained”.

The board denied that student or his father had made any such complaint and it was revealed the boy in question was absent on the day of the incident.

The Employment Relations Authority ruled that the school acted within its powers to have McConnell work from home during the investigation and the written warning was warranted.

Ad Feedback

- Fairfax Media

Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content