Doctor failed to tell patient of cancer

NICK TRUEBRIDGE
Last updated 09:47 26/08/2014

Relevant offers

Health

Jetstar apologises to female doctor after flight booking system assumes she is a man Two thirds of graduate doctors choose South Canterbury for first job Building company offers hope for family of Guillain-Barre syndrome sufferer No more limits after brain injury at 11 years old Waikato student Jordan Hicks uses sport to defy medical odds New Zealand urged to stop pinching overseas docs It's Not OK campaign to launch in Cambridge Blenheim pool closed after diarrhoea outbreak Mike King urges students to help others out of depression's 'dark hole' Vaccinations should be compulsory for 'the greater good' - vaccine inventor

A general practitioner may face legal action after the Health and Disability Commissioner found their mistakes contributed to the death of a 57-year-old woman with a history of breast cancer.

The unnamed doctor failed to warn the patient she had cancer in a shoulder, telling her only that she had a torn tendon.

The GP has been referred to the director of proceedings, who is considering whether to lay charges.

Commissioner Anthony Hill outlined several breaches of the Code of Health and Disability Services in his report into the case.

The general practitioner did not tell the woman, who had complained of pain in her left shoulder, about cancerous lesions picked up by an X-ray and ultrasound.

The doctor referred her to an orthopaedic surgeon with a note that failed to mention the lesions and touched only briefly on the woman's history of cancer.

The orthopaedic surgeon diagnosed the woman with a cancerous lesion in a shoulder. She died after a period of treatment.

Hill found the GP failed to arrange a timely follow-up after receiving an imaging report for the X-ray and ultrasound.

The GP also failed to discuss the X-ray and ultrasound results with the patient and did not give the orthopaedic surgeon adequate information.

Hill recommended the GP apologise to the woman's family, review their practice and conduct an audit to make sure patient test results received over the last two years were revisited.

Ad Feedback

- Stuff

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should fluoride in water be the responsibility of central government?

Yes

No

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content