Political apathy 'killing kids'

Last updated 05:00 04/06/2009

Relevant offers

Health

ACC beneficiary admits he cheated Cafe's stub-out stance a winner Doctor sceptical about boy's alternative cancer care Calls to stop the spread of fast food outlets Information withheld puts children 'at risk' Kiwi scientist urges halt to doomsday flu research City doctors earn less than country cousins Mounting cost of coping with mental illness Death linked with HIV stigma Auckland men unaware they have HIV: study

Kiwi kids are dying in accidents and from abuse and Third World diseases due to political apathy, doctors and child welfare experts say.

MPs were told yesterday by the Paediatric Society that New Zealand has the worst rates of death and injury from preventable causes in the developed world and much more is needed to reverse the trend.

And in a report due out today, the children's commissioner calls for extra funding to educate parents about the dangers of shaking babies, as it reveals why about 45 children under five are seriously injured and five killed each year at the hands of carers.

Starship children's hospital paediatric surgeon James Hamill told Parliament's health select committee a third of all child deaths were due to trauma, but the only paediatric intensive-care unit in New Zealand was at Starship.

Overseas studies show children in adult intensive-care units are twice as likely to die compared with patients in paediatric ICUs.

Dr Hamill, who chairs the College of Surgeons trauma committee, said while it wasn't possible for every hospital to have a paediatric ICU, national standards for dealing with child trauma victims and better data collection were needed.

MPs were also urged to consider other measures, such as 20kmh zones around schools, restricting the minimum age for a full driver's licence to at least 18 and better restraints for children in cars.

Capital and Coast paediatric surgeon Brendon Bowkett said hospitals were being squeezed by epidemics of infectious diseases associated with poverty and overcrowding, such as skin infections, whooping cough, chronic lung disease, pneumonia and rheumatic fever.

That led to the cancellation of "non-urgent" operations for grommets, tonsils and hernias that all children should be able to receive.

The select committee chair, National MP Paul Hutchison, said their concerns would be referred to health officials for consideration.

The children's commissioner's report out today looks at common risk factors for death and injury from abuse in New Zealand and worldwide. It suggests very young babies are most at risk of abuse.

"It only takes a small slap to the head or a short shake of a baby to do real harm," commissioner John Angus said.

He said there was a particular risk when babies were left in the care of young men who were not biological fathers who were often unprepared for the stresses of a crying baby and could have problems with anger or alcohol abuse.

He urged the Government to fund the Shaken Baby Prevention Programme being looked at by Auckland DHB to be piloted in Auckland and rolled out nationally.

Ad Feedback

Health Ministry chief child health adviser Pat Tuohy said the ministry could consider a paediatric trauma clinical network.

Meanwhile, the cure for poverty-related diseases was fixing poverty, he said.

"The number of children living in poverty has improved from 25 per cent in 2004 to 16 per cent in 2007, so there's a start. What cures poverty-related diseases is dealing with poverty."

Health Minister Tony Ryall said he had met Dr Hamill to talk about his proposal for national standards.

"It is an area we would like to consider further."

SICK STATISTICS

One child under five is admitted to hospital each week as a result of abuse. Between 1995 and 2004, 51 children under five died as a result of an assault.

Two children die and 190 are hospitalised each week as a result of accidents in New Zealand ranked last among 24 Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development countries in preventing child injury-related deaths.

The lifetime cost of a moderate head injury to a child is about $2.6 million. A severe head injury can cost $4.8m.

Hospital admissions for serious skin infections in children and young people more than doubled in the 15 years to 2006, as did the potentially fatal lung infection bronchiolitis in babies under 12 months.

DOCTORS' PROPOSED SOLUTIONS

20kmh zones around schools and busy pedestrian areas, which would cut the death rate from 100 per cent to 19 per cent after a collision.

Booster seats for all children till they turn nine or are at least 148cm tall.

Teaching new mums about accidents in the home and child skin infections.

Establishing child rehabilitation services.

Removing charges for after-hours medical care for children.

 

- By RUTH HILL and KELLY BURNS, Dominion Post

10 comments
Post a comment
Nigel Taylor   #10   06:02 am Jun 05 2009

Stating the obvious guy #4 10:21 am Jun 04 2009 'Of course it's primarily the parents' responsibility, but not all parents are responsible. This is when the Government and teachers need to step up their game and claim more social responsibility. It's all good and well to say "parents need to look after their children", but there obviously needs to be an alternative support system because many parents don't provide kids with what they need.' Shouldn't it be the parents, familes and carers stepping up their game? Most abuse is not always that easy to spot. Abusers are quick to site abuse of their human rights if accusations are made, hence alot of child welfare agencies/protection services are powerless until something happens. Then it's obviously too late.

Nigel Taylor   #9   05:43 am Jun 05 2009

When will we start expecting parents to take responsibilty for their children and stop using them as a way to get a welfare payout? If you want to see real poverty go to Africa, South America or parts of Asia. People who claim to be living below the poverty line here all tend to have money for cigarettes, booze, gambling and drugs. Ever since I've known, you actually get more money on welfare with kids than a lot of working families. To those who say that some parents who are not responsible enough to look after their childdren so the government or schools should step in, would you be the same people who accuse them of being intrusive, nanny state, big brothers who abuse the parents human rights? What about the child's human rights?

Grant   #8   02:11 pm Jun 04 2009

It seems rather disingenuous to talk about a small number of accidental deaths when New Zealand parents deliberately kill thousands of children each year.

Murray   #7   12:53 pm Jun 04 2009

We had better bring Larry Baldock and Bob McCoskrie along here - we cannot have any "social engineering" or "nanny state".

Parents have to be able to decide for themselves how to discipline their children.

Perhaps the conservatives and religious fundamentalists will recommend a referendum in New Zealand, costing about $8 million and stating,

" Should a light shake as part of good parental correction be a criminal offence in New Zealand? ".

Jennifer   #6   12:27 pm Jun 04 2009

If the goverment brings in tighter laws to do with safty around schools (ie reducing the speed limit) and made it manditory for all children under 12 or 4 foot 5 inch to be in a booster seat and all children under five to be in full harnest and tethered car seats (unless over 18 kg) then the rate of injury and death around roads would decrease dramatically. the only problem with that is they MUST enforce it. I met a lady yesturday that had a 1 1/2 year old and the child didnt have any type of car seat!!! and we wonder why so meny children die!

#3   #5   10:37 am Jun 04 2009

Why always such negative news items? Look at the bright side: NZ is the most peaceful country in the world! (stuff, yesterday)

Stating the obvious guy   #4   10:21 am Jun 04 2009

Of course it's primarily the parents' responsibility, but not all parents are responsible. This is when the Government and teachers need to step up their game and claim more social responsibility. It's all good and well to say "parents need to look after their children", but there obviously needs to be an alternative support system because many parents don't provide kids with what they need.

emma   #3   10:21 am Jun 04 2009

When children have weekly welfare, free health care, free education, subsidised housing and food banks, the blame should only apply to their abusive parents, there is only so much that government/society can or should have to do.

"Poverty" in NZ is hard to compare with the real slums of India and Africa.

Sylvia   #2   10:08 am Jun 04 2009

It is the parents who are doing most of the damage. Not government apathy. Whose responsibility is this?? When are parents going to be parents ie look after their children

Glennis   #1   10:05 am Jun 04 2009

What about a bit of parental responsibility here?? Why does everything swing back to the Government or the teachers?

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content