Experts back proposal to cut blood alcohol limit

Last updated 15:25 08/04/2010
Driving
KENT BLECHYNDEN/Dominion Post
STOP: Constable Sean Loughran pulls over motorbike rider Rick Hemi during a drink driving checkpoint in Masterton.

Related Links

Govt confirms zero alcohol limit for youth drivers Test for alcohol 'at all crashes' Alcohol labelling a challenge for panel Alcohol-fuelled assaults leave two in hospital Police, firefighters, soldiers fight for alcohol rights

Relevant offers

Health

A burning issue: When coffins get too big Teens mimic depression to get prescription drugs Promoter dismisses bike helmet harm study Plucky mother intent on recovery ACC beneficiary admits he cheated Cafe's stub-out stance a winner Doctor sceptical about boy's alternative cancer care Calls to stop the spread of fast food outlets Information withheld puts children 'at risk' Kiwi scientist urges halt to doomsday flu research

Health experts are backing a government proposal to cut the blood alcohol limit, saying people driving within the current level may be slurring their speech and falling over.

The Government released its 10-year road safety strategy, "Safer Journeys" last August.

It proposed reducing the legal blood alcohol limit from 80mg per 100ml to 50mg per 100ml. There could also be a zero blood alcohol limit for those under 20 years of age and recidivist offenders.

Transport Minister Steven Joyce was progressing a road safety Cabinet paper on the impacts of alcohol out of Safer Journeys. Final Cabinet consideration on it was due shortly, a spokeswoman from his office said.

Capital Coast District Health Board chief medical officer Geoff Robinson said the 80mg level was reasonably high by international standards.

At that level people would be perceived as intoxicated with slurrying speech, unsteady walking, impaired judgement, nausea and tripping over, he said.

"People at 80mg/l are quite significantly intoxicated but I think that because 80mg/l is the legal driving limit they think it's ok."

A man weighing 85kg and measuring 1.8m can consume between five to eight standard drinks, or seven stubbies of beer, over a two-hour period and remain below the current limit, ESR forensic toxicologist Allan Stowell calculated.

An average woman weighing 70kg and measuring 1.65m could consume 3.4-5.4 standard drinks in a two-hour period.

"I'm not saying they'd be safe drivers, but they would probably not exceed the limit."

Increasing the time spent drinking meant more drinks could be consumed before reaching the current 80mg/l limit, Dr Stowell said.

Reducing the limit to 50mg/l would see the limit of standard drinks over two hours down to 3.6-5.9 for men and 2.4-4 for women.

Men and women have the same rate of clearing alcohol from their bodies but women do not need to drink the same amount as men to achieve the same blood alcohol level, Dr Stowell said. That accounts for the difference between the sexes in the numbers of drinks which can be consumed.

He said 50mg/l was an internationally recognised threshold above which the risk of being involved in an accident increased.

University of Otago head of preventive and social medicine Jennie Connor said a small difference in the blood alcohol level of drivers could result in a large increase in the risk of them crashing.

Ad Feedback

International research showed reducing the legal blood alcohol limit not only reduced the number of alcohol-related accidents but also the number of people caught with random breath testing and led to a change in public attitude.

With a lower level people were more likely to keep track of how much they were drinking and to decide earlier in the night whether they would drive, Prof Connor said.

A study in Denmark showed more people decided not to drink at all, or to have only one drink, when they were driving.

It was also shown to reduce problem drinking in general through increased awareness, she said.

The United Kingdom, the United States and Canada still have a 80mg/l limit. The majority of countries, including Australia, Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands, have a 50mg/l limit.

There are others, Poland (30mg/l) and Norway, Russia and Sweden (all 20mg/l) who have even lower limits, Prof Connor said.

The comments came as the Alcohol Advisory Council (Alac) launched a new drinking campaign last night aimed at the friends and loved ones of problem drinkers.

Alac chief executive Gerard Vaughan said the advertising aimed to create an environment where people could have the confidence, social permission and tools to talk to a close friend or family member if they wanted to.

- NZPA

61 comments
Post a comment
healthcotch   #61   01:37 am Jan 11 2011

Hello,

Thank you for your nice article. I found something special on it. Thanks

jimbo jones   #60   06:29 pm May 17 2010

what a load of bollocks. 0.05 will mean if i down just 5 pints of stellar one night and catch a taxi home, then 12 hours later on my way to collect my car im stopped and found to be marginally over the new BAC. 0.05 will gve the police every excuse to harrass innocent motorists during morning rush hour, It will make a mockery of the quote "if you dont drink and drive your a bloody genuis" and bring the law into disrepute. target those with BAC Over 0.16 and who drive immediatly after drinking not those marginally over the proposed limit the next day.

Gary   #59   07:01 pm Apr 08 2010

@ Pat #2, Jane #3 & Stu #5. Come on! It is NOT those who enjoy a glass of wine with a meal who are in the group constantly killing people on our roads. People in that category will fill up and drive regardless of the legal limit. If the limit must be lowered then fine, lower it to 50mg/l (1 standard drink) but please don't tar everyone with the same brush!

Jazzy Jopolopadis   #58   06:41 pm Apr 08 2010

I think we also need to look at the caffiene levels in drivers, the consumption of coffee before driving causes as many accidents as alcohol or drugs, it is essentially a drug as is tobacco, all are mind altering and should be treated the same way, high in sugar foods should also be tested for when people are pulled over, For instance a coffee and a meringue or two taken just 2 minutes before driving could also affect the behaviour of the driver behind the wheel but goes under the radar in the current system. Physical behaviorial changes with high sugar levels in many are just as dangerous as alcohol or drugs.

Paddy   #57   06:13 pm Apr 08 2010

Zero is the only way to be sure. The repeat offenders should lose their license for life and face jail time. Alcoholism is out there but the decision to drive is a seperate issue. Impaired decision making must have the same consequence as any. Drink drivers that cause accidents or even worse kill must be tried for at minimum manslaughter. Gets back to the lack of personal responsibility our nation is so fond of these days. Enough is enough.

redsFan   #56   06:08 pm Apr 08 2010

There's a difference between having a glass of wine with diner and having 3-4 drinks. Are we able to NOT drink so we can drive ?

Dan   #55   06:07 pm Apr 08 2010

Fully agree with ericha, to dare for a cab, cheaper to risk a drive home, its not like the Police are everywhere.

Robert   #54   06:00 pm Apr 08 2010

RE: Stu #5

The problem with zero alcohol tolerance is many food items have alcohol or produce it as a by-product during consumption. Should you be labelled a drink driver because you had some dessert with a bit of sherry in it?

Steve   #53   05:58 pm Apr 08 2010

The level should be lowered. I am male and about 85 kg, there is absolutely no way I would drive after 7 stubbies, in fact not even after 3.

We should also increase tax on alcoholic drinks and regulate sales more closely. we have become too tolerant to the devastation caused by by alcohol in NZ.

Brett   #52   05:43 pm Apr 08 2010

I agree with Erica. This will not stop that person who couldn’t care less what the limit is who gets paralytic and kills someone. Make it zero and this will still happen. This is not the answer?


Show 2-51 of 61 comments

Post comment


Required

Required. Will not be published.
Registration is not required to post a comment but if you , you will not have to enter your details each time you comment. Registered members also have access to extra features. Create an account now.


Maximum of 1750 characters (about 300 words)

I have read and accepted the terms and conditions
These comments are moderated. Your comment, if approved, may not appear immediately. Please direct any queries about comment moderation to the Opinion Editor at blogs@stuff.co.nz
Special offers

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content