That dreadful fever may be good for you

KIRAN CHUG
Last updated 05:00 13/11/2010

Relevant offers

Health

Four-hour wait to get stitched up Shock photo pushes rush on vaccine District Health Board's website hacked Rush cleans out chickenpox vaccine supplies Former Welly advocate fires up ACC protest Surgeon under investigation resigns Youth brought low by legal high CT scans raise youth cancer risk Council hears proposal to ban smoking Parents told to keep tabs as child sex on rise

Treating a fever could do more harm than good, say New Zealand researchers.

The researchers will carry out a study on 80 flu patients next winter to test their theory that it is better to let a fever run its course, as taking drugs could be risky.

The team from the Medical Research Institute and Capital and Coast District Health Board have looked at previous trials on animals in which common treatments such as aspirin, paracetamol and ibuprofen were used to treat fevers.

Their study has been published in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

Study co-author Kyle Perrin said the results were striking, and showed that animals given drugs to fight a fever were more likely to die from flu. "The ones treated with anti-fever agents died at about a 30 per cent higher rate. It was as simple as that."

The results led the team to believe fevers could be a natural protective mechanism which kicked in when animals had flu, to improve their chances of survival.

The study this winter would help them understand whether the same was true for humans.

"When you review everything it seems pretty clear to us that the presence of a fever response in all animals, including humans, is protective."

Ad Feedback

- © Fairfax NZ News

Special offers
Opinion poll

Palmerston North's proposal for a city-wide smoking ban is:

A good idea

Good in parts but goes too far

A bad idea

Vote Result

Related story: Council mulls city-wide smoking ban

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content