Pharmac attacked for rushing drug

The Centre for Adverse Reactions Monitoring (Carm) has received around 50 reports of people experiencing bleeding since the new oral blood-thinning drug  Pradaxa was introduced two months ago.
The Centre for Adverse Reactions Monitoring (Carm) has received around 50 reports of people experiencing bleeding since the new oral blood-thinning drug Pradaxa was introduced two months ago.

Dozens of elderly patients have suffered bleeds – and at least two have died – after taking an anti-blood clotting drug which was rushed onto the market by Pharmac in a deal worth more than $100m.

Some doctors say Pharmac, the government drug funding agency, may have put lives at risk by funding Pradaxa, also known as dabigatran, before more was known about managing its side effects.

Pradaxa is a new oral blood-thinning drug used to reduce the risk of stroke in people with heart rhythm disorder, and can also be used to prevent clots following hip or knee replacements.

The Centre for Adverse Reactions Monitoring (Carm) has received around 50 reports of people experiencing bleeding since the drug was introduced two months ago as a replacement for the standard blood-thinning drug warfarin. Around 56,000 people take warfarin and thousands have been switched to Pradaxa.

It is unclear how many deaths have resulted, but the Sunday Star-Times has heard of two elderly patients, a man and a woman, dying after bleeds.

Other patients, mostly odler than 75, have experienced symptoms including coughing up blood, rectal bleeding and bleeding around the brain. Some improved after they stopped taking Pradaxa but others needed multiple blood transfusions and in some cases there were major surgery complications. An 84-year-old man had to wait nine days for surgery on a fractured hip because of complications associated with Pradaxa.

Bleeding is a known risk of blood-thinning drugs but doctors are concerned that there is no treatment to reverse the effects of Pradaxa, unlike warfarin, which can be quickly revesed by administering another drug. One surgeon, who asked not to be named, said he did not believe clinicians should be prescribing Pradaxa.

Pharmac declared Pradaxa was a "game changer" when it announced in June it was fully funding it without restriction, meaning any clinician can prescribe it. Pharmac had signed a deal with drug company Boehringer Ingelheim which could cost $155m over five years, although this will drop through rebates.

"We do have concerns about the way it was rolled out," said Humphrey Pullon, of the Haematology Society. "It was rolled out very rapidly without a lot of forethought and planning. In particular the fact that general practitioners could have widespread access to this drug from day one was a concern to us, when some of them did not know how to use it."

Research by haematologists has found that GPs have been prescribing the drug to people who should never have been given it, such as those with poor kidney function.

Medsafe said in a statement that it considered the benefits of Pradaxa outweighed the risks. It was "closely monitoring the safety of dabigatran (Pradaxa)" and would follow the results of a number of ongoing safety studies being undertaken by Boehringer Ingelheim. Any suspected adverse reactions should be reported to Carm and patients who had concerns should discuss it with their doctor.

Pharmac said in a statement that Medsafe had decided Pradaxa was safe to register in New Zealand.

"As with all adverse events, both Pharmac and Medsafe take these reports very seriously. In addition to the normal safety nets, the haematologists' reporting system is proving to be invaluable and the results are being monitored by all agencies."

The reporting system is being run by Palmerston North haematologist Paul Harper, who said it was a bit late to be starting efforts to manage adverse effects when the drug had been on the market two months.

"The drug came in much quicker than we expected and there hasn't been much opportunity to really educate people about how to use it," Harper said. "We haven't really got anything helpful to reverse the effects of the drug, and that's the big concern. If someone does have a significant bleed we haven't got a good way of managing that."

Although Pradaxa is no more effective than warfarin, it does not require the regular blood tests which people on that drug must undergo, which Pharmac sees as a major cost-saver.

But Harper said there was not much known about Pradaxa internationally as there had only been one clinical trial. There had been reports of deaths in Japan and the US.

New Zealand is one of the only countries that has fully funded the drug. Some doctors are concerned that Pharmac has put commercial concerns ahead of patient safety.

Pullon said: "I think there were certain commercial pressures whereby in order to generate adequate volumes and generate the savings they really had to open it up to ... GP prescribing," he said. "That's a commercial risk that Pharmac entered into. It certainly wasn't done with any consultation with the society."

Pharmac's statement said: "There is no incentive for any clinician to maximise prescribing of this medicine. There is a substantial cost to the pharmaceutical budget from the prescribing of this medicine."

It said decision-making around Pradaxa took 14 months and included seeking clinical advice.

Harper's research has found that Pradaxa is unsuitable in certain doses for people over 75, those with poor kidney function, people of low weight and those with replacement heart valves. There have also been problems with people switching between Warfarin and Pradaxa too quickly.

Pullon said the haematology society had warned Pharmac the drug could cause bleeding.

"They then gathered a group of haematologists ... and generated some guidelines as to how the drug should be used. It was a bit of an afterthought."

Do you know anyone who has had an adverse reaction to Pradaxa? Email

Sunday Star Times