Fluoride fight goes to Court of Appeal

Last updated 14:24 26/03/2014

Relevant offers

Health

Budget 'not a lot of use' for elderly Budget boost for mental health may not be enough, campaigners say The board that kicked the hornet's nest Children checked for typhoid after outbreak spreads south Pacific Music Awards nominee Annie Grace transformed by tragedy Budget 2017: Health funding to record levels with $1.7b injection to DHBs Dr Lance O'Sullivan tells anti-vaxxer to 'come to the hospital and see the ravaged bodies' after controversial film screening Former Taranaki basketballer Craig Hickford overcoming odds in battle back from bike accident Medicinal cannabis reduces seizures in children with Dravet syndrome, clinical study shows Watch: Hilary Barry hits out at anti-vaxxers, backs Dr Lance O'Sullivan

The water fluoridation fight is set to continue in the Court of Appeal.

Anti-fluoride campaigners, New Health NZ, today filed a notice of appeal in the Court of Appeal against a High Court decision upholding the lawfulness of water fluoridation.

The High Court affirmed last month the right of local government to fluoridate drinking water.

In his decision, Justice Rodney Hansen threw out claims from anti-fluoride campaigners, who had disputed the South Taranaki District Council's decision to add fluoride to drinking water in Waverley and Patea.

It was within the council's legal power, and right mind, to add fluoride to drinking water, he said.

That decision did not satisfy New Health NZ chairman David Sloan, who said the judgment paved the way for mass medication.

The basis of the appeal was the fluoride being used in the water supply coming within the definition of a "medicine" under the Medicines Act. It was a "medical treatment" under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act, he said.

Ad Feedback

- Stuff

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should fluoride in water be the responsibility of central government?

Yes

No

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content