Fluoride fight goes to Court of Appeal

Last updated 14:24 26/03/2014

Relevant offers

Health

Bella delighted to finally be able to ride to school with her mates 'Liquidate your business and then we can help' - injury cripples couple, but it could be worse Mother of child with brain tumour makes tutus to fundraise for cause One in four Marlborough hospital staff aren't washing their hands enough A woman's struggle after daughter's death Green MP Kevin Hague: 'Unfinished business' in mental health Reformed addict condemns society's 'disgusting' acceptance of gambling Bad outcomes for new babies more likely with midwife, research shows From full hip replacements to rock climbing competition victory Bishop and Mallard go head-to-head for blood pressure awareness

The water fluoridation fight is set to continue in the Court of Appeal.

Anti-fluoride campaigners, New Health NZ, today filed a notice of appeal in the Court of Appeal against a High Court decision upholding the lawfulness of water fluoridation.

The High Court affirmed last month the right of local government to fluoridate drinking water.

In his decision, Justice Rodney Hansen threw out claims from anti-fluoride campaigners, who had disputed the South Taranaki District Council's decision to add fluoride to drinking water in Waverley and Patea.

It was within the council's legal power, and right mind, to add fluoride to drinking water, he said.

That decision did not satisfy New Health NZ chairman David Sloan, who said the judgment paved the way for mass medication.

The basis of the appeal was the fluoride being used in the water supply coming within the definition of a "medicine" under the Medicines Act. It was a "medical treatment" under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act, he said.

Ad Feedback

- Stuff

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should fluoride in water be the responsibility of central government?

Yes

No

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content