Fluoride fight goes to Court of Appeal

Last updated 14:24 26/03/2014

Relevant offers

Health

Manawatu health advocate applauds cigarette tax hike Junk Free June on the menu for Manwatu Mum-of-three Amanda Ferreira loses her battle with cancer DHBs still being shortchanged, says Labour - unveils health map to highlight regional shortfalls Putting her fears aside to help a child Govt finds $10m to kickstart Greymouth hospital construction Six more measles cases confirmed in Horowhenua Teacher Samuel Back cuddled girl in bed, conspired with partner against child's parents Canterbury District Health Board gets lowest funding increase Budget 2016: Minister Paula Bennett and Labour's Annette King divided, but onside with tobacco tax

The water fluoridation fight is set to continue in the Court of Appeal.

Anti-fluoride campaigners, New Health NZ, today filed a notice of appeal in the Court of Appeal against a High Court decision upholding the lawfulness of water fluoridation.

The High Court affirmed last month the right of local government to fluoridate drinking water.

In his decision, Justice Rodney Hansen threw out claims from anti-fluoride campaigners, who had disputed the South Taranaki District Council's decision to add fluoride to drinking water in Waverley and Patea.

It was within the council's legal power, and right mind, to add fluoride to drinking water, he said.

That decision did not satisfy New Health NZ chairman David Sloan, who said the judgment paved the way for mass medication.

The basis of the appeal was the fluoride being used in the water supply coming within the definition of a "medicine" under the Medicines Act. It was a "medical treatment" under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act, he said.

Ad Feedback

- Stuff

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should fluoride in water be the responsibility of central government?

Yes

No

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content