Fluoride fight goes to Court of Appeal

Last updated 14:24 26/03/2014

Relevant offers

Health

Ex-trade union leader Helen Kelly seeks 'magic bullet' cancer treatment in Cuba Awarua pig trial could be closed Tukituki River 'very unlikely' source of Havelock North water contamination Anaesthetist slams Greenpeace for 'spam attack' aimed at his councillor wife Tobacco plain packaging law takes another step towards reality Loathe your job in your 20s or 30s? That may hurt your health by your 40s More donors wanted but nowhere to donate in the top of the south Experts: Even moderate drinkers at risk of cancer Nelson Marlborough District Health Board supports ban of unflued gas heaters Most people 'change their mind' about wanting to end their life: palliative care doctor

The water fluoridation fight is set to continue in the Court of Appeal.

Anti-fluoride campaigners, New Health NZ, today filed a notice of appeal in the Court of Appeal against a High Court decision upholding the lawfulness of water fluoridation.

The High Court affirmed last month the right of local government to fluoridate drinking water.

In his decision, Justice Rodney Hansen threw out claims from anti-fluoride campaigners, who had disputed the South Taranaki District Council's decision to add fluoride to drinking water in Waverley and Patea.

It was within the council's legal power, and right mind, to add fluoride to drinking water, he said.

That decision did not satisfy New Health NZ chairman David Sloan, who said the judgment paved the way for mass medication.

The basis of the appeal was the fluoride being used in the water supply coming within the definition of a "medicine" under the Medicines Act. It was a "medical treatment" under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act, he said.

Ad Feedback

- Stuff

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should fluoride in water be the responsibility of central government?

Yes

No

Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content