Fluoride fight goes to Court of Appeal

Last updated 14:24 26/03/2014

Relevant offers


Johnson & Johnson cancer claims: Jury awards nearly $100m to woman in baby powder lawsuit Labour: Housing NZ must account for 'financial and human cost' of meth testing flaws Battling Parkinson's disease with exercise New Zealand Medical Journal pulls junk food article at the last minute Wellington woman Annemarie Treadwell's death trigger for Police euthanasia furore 32 per cent of Kiwi children and teens will be overweight or obese by 2025 Wilson Home Trust management issues upset families 11-year-old boy who failed hearing test had Lego lodged in ear for years Hamilton's Great Shave Off: The Battle Between the Bar Beards Kiwis increasingly hitting 100 year milestone

The water fluoridation fight is set to continue in the Court of Appeal.

Anti-fluoride campaigners, New Health NZ, today filed a notice of appeal in the Court of Appeal against a High Court decision upholding the lawfulness of water fluoridation.

The High Court affirmed last month the right of local government to fluoridate drinking water.

In his decision, Justice Rodney Hansen threw out claims from anti-fluoride campaigners, who had disputed the South Taranaki District Council's decision to add fluoride to drinking water in Waverley and Patea.

It was within the council's legal power, and right mind, to add fluoride to drinking water, he said.

That decision did not satisfy New Health NZ chairman David Sloan, who said the judgment paved the way for mass medication.

The basis of the appeal was the fluoride being used in the water supply coming within the definition of a "medicine" under the Medicines Act. It was a "medical treatment" under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act, he said.

Ad Feedback

- Stuff

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should fluoride in water be the responsibility of central government?



Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content