Growing concern over medical freebies

Last updated 05:00 12/04/2014

Relevant offers


Plunket to release Asian parenting strategy Surgeon Michael Parry says sorry to dead patient's family Bay of Plenty teen leaves hospital after paralysing accident Paddle for Life raises for family hit twice by cancer Mum terrified of winter due to son's asthma Christchurch 78-year-old endures painful wait for hip replacement Respiratory disease a 'national disgrace' Patient died on operating table after failures by surgeon and health board Court says carer of disabled adult can sue for compensation Midwife failed to act on stillbirth warning signs - report

Doctors and nurses accepted drug company-funded trips, meals and gifts worth almost $170,000 last year amid growing concern about the freebies' potential to influence medical decisions.

District health board gift registers obtained under the Official Information Act show health workers accepted 109 drug company "gifts", including overseas trips flying business class.

The largest gift, from Novartis to an Auckland doctor, was $13,500 in flights and accommodation to attend a four-day osteoporosis meeting in Rome.

Drug companies also hosted meals, including Roche and Gilead spending $6400 for two "educational dinners" for 35 Auckland haematology staff.

One Wellington intensive care doctor was paid a $2500 honorarium for one day's work advising Baxter Healthcare. The declared gifts are likely to be only a fraction of the total spent by pharmaceutical companies, as gift registers do not cover private doctors.

Despite Health Minister Tony Ryall's 2012 assurances that DHBs would standardise their approaches to declaring drug company gifts, policies still vary widely.

Some DHBs had no gift register. Others had registers, but with nothing declared. Waitemata DHB's 6800 staff declared just one "gift" in 12 months - a tapa cloth given to its chief executive.

Countries are now demanding greater transparency of payments to doctors as research has shown drug company largesse influences medical decisions.

Australia's pharmaceutical industry body Medicines Australia now declares how much it spends on hospitality and advisory boards.

Medical Association president Mark Peterson supported a similar public national register here.

"To say you're not influenced at all by drug company behaviour is a bit naive. . . . The key point is openness and the declaration of any interest."

However, he would not advocate banning doctors and nurses from accepting drug company sponsorship.


Auckland:17 drug company* gifts declared, worth $32,592. The only health board to identify recipients.

Counties Manukau:29 drug company gifts declared, worth $45,809. Two gifts were declined.

Waikato: One policy outlaws gifts, such as free air travel or accommodation. Another says drug firms commonly provide subsidised travel and such "outside" work must not interfere with DHB duties.

Bay of Plenty:1 drug company gift declared, worth $50.99.

Hawke's Bay: Gifts must be reported but no register is kept.

Mid Central: No register kept. Staff required to "decline gifts or benefits that place oneself under any obligation or perceived influence".

Ad Feedback

Hutt Valley:1 drug-company gift declared, worth $750.

Capital & Coast:7 drug company gifts declared, worth $9445.

Canterbury: Staff must file conflict of interest forms, but no log kept.

West Coast: No register kept.

Southern:56 drug company gifts declared, worth $80,690.

Northland, Waitemata, Tairawhiti, Lakes: Some gifts declared but none from drug companies.

Taranaki, Whanganui, Wairarapa, Nelson-Marlborough, South Canterbury: No gifts declared.

* "Drug company" includes medical device makers

- The Dominion Post


Special offers
Opinion poll

Should fluoride in water be the responsibility of central government?



Vote Result

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content