Ministry mum on gambling foundation evaluation

Last updated 05:00 05/06/2014

Relevant offers


Education Minister Hekia Parata announces Marlborough colleges decision Live Chat replay: Chief Social Worker Paul Nixon talks child abuse in NZ Partner of Kiwi detainee speaks out about detention centre struggles Stories of detained Kiwis show 'crude' nature of Aus policy - Andrew Little Why I'm voting my daughter's choice in the flag referendum Positive signs from Andrew Little's Australia trip, but more heat than light? Jacinda Ardern: 'It's not a good place to be a child' Waikato ratepayers pay for investigation into mayor's swear word Lack of trust in National Standards on the agenda for Blenheim schools MP Clare Curran posts photo of invalid flag vote online

The Ministry of Health is refusing to provide details of how it evaluated services for the Problem Gambling Foundation.

The foundation began legal action last month to stop the ministry dumping it as the national provider for gambling harm services, in favour of the Salvation Army.

Critics of the decision have said it was politically motivated; a punishment for the foundation, which opposed the Government's SkyCity convention deal. The ministry and Internal Affairs Minister Peter Dunne have both denied that, but ministry deputy director-general for sector capability and implementation Cathy O'Malley will not provide the evaluations of both providers' performances.

"I have decided that it is necessary to withhold this information to enable the ministry to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities and contract negotiations," she said. "My reasons for withholding this information are not outweighed by other considerations which render it desirable, in the public interest, to make the information available."

The ministry has issued six-monthly reports from the providers, but would not detail the scores given by ministry officials.

Foundation chief executive Graeme Ramsey said he was surprised. He knew its scores from the ministry were "in the bottom third" across all 20 providers in each marking category.

This was despite a 2011 analysis by management consultant KPMG, which said the foundation had improved its performance to 100 per cent of its service targets in 2010. Ramsey believed transparency would be beneficial.

"I would have thought it would be helpful for the public to see how they might possibly have reached that decision, because we certainly don't understand it."

The latest rebuff comes after official documents showed the foundation and the ministry were embroiled in a long-running argument over the foundation's right to speak out on gambling issues.

The ministry threatened to terminate its contract if the foundation did not halt its "pokie free and proud of it" campaign, promoting pokie-free pubs.

It argued that no public money should be spent, or be seen to be spent, on political campaigns.

But the foundation has got a reprieve till the court action ends, with the ministry confirming its funding will remain till February.

Ad Feedback

- The Dominion Post


Special offers
Opinion poll

Should the speed limit be raised to 110kmh on some roads?



Vote Result

Related story: 110kmh limit moves closer

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content