Old, young in sights for Labour, NZ First

TRACY WATKINS AND HAMISH RUTHERFORD
Last updated 05:00 11/08/2014
David Cunliffe campaign
DAVID WHITE/ Fairfax NZ

CAMPAIGN TRAIL: David Cunliffe at Labour’s election campaign launch in central Auckland. 

Relevant offers

Politics

Cunliffe emerges from crisis meeting still in charge Cunliffe battles Labour caucus Labour must own 'crushing defeat': Shearer Beehive Live: The waiting game Key open to working with NZ First John Key's a political rock star: Australia John Key's rap battle goes global Brakes come off government's RMA reform Election blights leave bill Labour faces huge challenge

A battle has erupted over the affordability of taxpayers funding GP care for the elderly after Labour pledged to make their doctors' visits free.

With the over-65s paying on average $31 a visit, Labour is hoping to match the huge success of the existing scheme for children by extending it to the over-65s.

But National is labelling the pledge unaffordable and says the elderly are not the group most in need.

Labour and NZ First charged out of the blocks at their election campaign launches yesterday with promises totaling more than $300 million.

The elderly and the very young were the big winners.

Labour made a grab for the pensioner vote with its promise to roll out free doctors' visits and prescriptions to over-65s, while NZ First promised to enrol all newborn babies in KiwiSaver with a $1000 kickstart that could be put toward their tertiary education.

Children up to 13 and pregnant women, who are currently entitled to free primary health care in relation to their pregnancy but not other medical needs, will also get free GP visits and prescriptions at a cost of $20m under Labour's plan, and expectant mothers will get free dental care.

Labour's promise builds on National's earlier announcement in May that it was extending the free doctors' visits to children under 13.

But National yesterday drew the line at doing the same for the elderly and said Labour's promise was "desperate electioneering".

It also claimed that Labour had underestimated the cost of extending the scheme to over-65s, who pay on average $31 a visit to see their GP.

Outgoing Health Minister Tony Ryall said Labour had not allowed for the extra demand free visits would result in.

"If anything is free people use it more. Free Coca-Cola? People will drink it."

Surveys had also shownthe over-65s were not the most in need of free doctor visits, he said.

The NZ Health survey showed that only 6 per cent of over-65s had reported they did not go to the GP because they were deterred by cost, compared with a national average of 15 per cent.

"If it is all about targeting unmet need this is the one group that seems to have the lowest unmet need."

Labour's pledge would extend free doctors' visits and prescriptions to 1.7 million people - 40 per cent of the population.

Announcing the policy, Labour leader David Cunliffe said the September 20 election was about a choice between prosperity for all or only for a few.

The over-65s component of the policy will cost $120m a year, while other measures including extended care for pregnant women would take the total bill to $280m.

At his campaign launch in suburban Auckland, Winston Peters told about 300 party faithful that NZ First would extend KiwiSaver to newborn babies with a $1000 kick start from the state. Under the policy parents would be able to use their KiwiSaver funds to pay tertiary education fees of their children.

Peters said the plan would, over time, reduce the burden of student debt both on the government and students.

"We've got to free ourselves from foreign money and anything we can do to get ourselves into a savings culture, the better," Peters said afterwards.

Ad Feedback

Peters' said the party would campaign for "economic nationalism" and he focused on the issue of sale of land to foreigners and the proportion of the economy owned by Australian companies. The party would also "ban" illegal gangs, with Peters pointing to crackdowns by four Australian states. "They [gangs] have shifted into the serious industry of drugs. They are aligned with Asian suppliers and they're also into serious people trafficking and prostitution and we need to stop them in their tracks."

- Stuff

Special offers
Opinion poll

Does David Cunliffe need to resign as Labour leader?

Yes, he's failed to deliver

It won't make a difference

No, he needs more time in the role

Vote Result

Related story: David Cunliffe's leadership on the line

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content