Williams takes NZ First to court over list

AIMEE GULLIVER
Last updated 16:27 29/08/2014
Andrew Williams NZ First
LAWRENCE SMITH/Fairfax NZ

GONE: Ex-North Shore mayor Andrew Willliams entered parliament with NZ First in 2011.

Relevant offers

Politics

The Government has re-written the rules of the accommodation supplement, creating some big winners The budget as seen from the south Budget 2017: Government answers schools' pleas with $60.5 million boost Budget bolsters welfare, but what about housing? Max Rashbrooke: A Government trying to make up for past neglect Budget reveals plans for locks, lights for repeat burglary victims Budget boost for mental health may not be enough, campaigners say Budget 2017: Family income and tax package - by the numbers Mike Williams: Opportunity lost for some Budget big ideas First home buyers question how the Budget helps them

NZ First MP Andrew Williams has started legal proceedings over being dumped from the party list ahead of the election.

Williams is seeking a declaration that the party breached its constitution when it determined the list, removing him as an electorate (East Coast Bays) and list candidate.

Williams had been ranked number 3 on the party list in 2011, and said he was given no reason for his demotion.

"I regret that I have no other option other than to take my party to Court to protect my reputation", Williams said.

He had been "mistreated" by the party.

"I do not, however, wish to derail NZ First's campaign, so I am asking for an urgent hearing following the election.

"As the matter is now before the Court, I do not intend to make further comment."

Party leader Winston Peters was not aware of Williams filing legal proceedings this afternoon. He had not been served with a writ.

He said Williams didn't understand the party's constitution, the legal precedent or the process if he was taking court action.

Peters laughed off suggestions he had lost control of his caucus and said it was inevitable some people would be upset with their list rankings.

University of Otago law professor Andrew Geddis said the precedent in a case like this had ironically been set by Peters, when he was in the process of being dumped by National.

The court accepted Peters could challenge actions of the party, but at the same time took a narrow procedural approach to the issue.

It would be a matter of the court examining NZ First's constitution and seeing what allowed it to take the step of dumping Williams, Geddis said.

Even if a court decided the process was flawed, it would have to decide on a remedy.

"And is a court really going to order NZ First to stick a guy who is right on the outer with them back on their list?

"What they can just say is the party has breached its rules, and just basically leave it at that. It's going to be a hard ask," Geddis said.

Peters said earlier this week he was "very concerned" about Williams' comments surrounding a draft list, saying they breached a confidentiality agreement that all engaged in the process had been required to sign.

It is understood Williams was removed from the selection process from NZ First because of the comments, with the party believing it made him ineligible to be an MP.

Ad Feedback

- Stuff

Special offers
Opinion poll

Should the speed limit be raised to 110kmh on some roads?

Yes

No

Vote Result

Related story: 110kmh limit moves closer

Featured Promotions

Sponsored Content